Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 7;14:13088. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63737-x

Table 4.

Effects of soil amendments on the cooking, nutrition and hygiene quality of rice.

Season Cultivar Treatment AC (%) GC (mm) PC BR-Cd (mg kg−1)
Early rice LLY-996 CK 26.77a 35.0b 7.09b 0.206a
LM 26.93a 39.5b 7.61b 0.146b
SC 26.72a 46.5a 8.14a 0.140b
BC 27.15a 46.0a 8.84a 0.154b
ZLY-819 CK 22.96a 58.5b 6.21b 0.155a
LM 22.45a 61.5b 6.94b 0.113b
SC 22.32a 65.5a 8.94a 0.108b
BC 22.49a 68.5a 9.47a 0.131ab
Late rice YZX CK 15.79a 67.0b 6.90b 0.197a
LM 15.57a 70.5b 7.13b 0.119b
SC 15.36a 76.0a 7.92a 0.116b
BC 15.40a 79.0a 8.35a 0.132b
XWX-13 CK 14.67a 68.5b 6.39b 0.128a
LM 14.80a 71.0b 7.37ab 0.094b
SC 14.59a 75.5a 7.76a 0.091b
BC 14.72a 77.5a 7.99a 0.101b

The different letters indicate that significant differences were found between the treatments for each cultivar using least significant difference tests.

CK control, BC biochar, LM lime, SC silicon–calcium fertilizer, AC amylose content, GC gel consistency, PC protein content, BR-Cd brown rice Cd content, ZLY 819 Zhuliangyou 819, LLY 996 Luliangyou 996, YZX Yuzhenxiang, XWX 13 Xiangwanxian 13.

Values followed by different lowercase letters in the same group indicate significant difference among treatments n = 3, p < 0.05.