Table 2. Analysis of mean working length (mm) comparisons between CBCT and EAL methods, as determined by the dependent t-test, showing the mean (±standard deviation) values in millimeters.
*Statistically significant
WL: working length, EAL: electronic apex locator, PA: periapical radiograph, CBCT: cone beam computed tomography
| Root canal ID | Number of measured canals | Mean WL (EAL and PA radiograph) | Mean WL (CBCT) | Mean difference (EAL-CBCT) | P values |
| Buccal | 85 | 21.06 (±0.24) | 21.2 (±0.24) | -0.13 (±0.07) | 0.058 |
| Palatal | 65 | 19.2 (±0.28) | 19.4 (±0.29) | -0.16 (±0.07) | 0.034* |
| Mesial | 3 | 20.33 (±1.2) | 20.44 (±1.49) | -0.4 (±0.28) | 0.73 |
| Distal | 39 | 19.1 (±0.32) | 19.06 (±0.30) | 0.04 (±0.09) | 0.68 |
| Mesiobuccal | 26 | 19.08 (±0.36) | 19.05 (±0.38) | 0.03 (±0.14) | 0.835 |
| Mesiolingual | 13 | 18.84 (±0.6) | 18.99 (±0.55) | -0.15 (±0.13) | 0.28 |
| Distobuccal | 17 | 17.94 (±0.42) | 16.9 (±1.13) | 1.03 (±1.01) | 0.32 |