Skip to main content
. 2024 May 8;16(5):e59907. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59907

Table 2. Analysis of mean working length (mm) comparisons between CBCT and EAL methods, as determined by the dependent t-test, showing the mean (±standard deviation) values in millimeters.

*Statistically significant

WL: working length, EAL: electronic apex locator, PA: periapical radiograph, CBCT: cone beam computed tomography

Root canal ID Number of measured canals Mean WL (EAL and PA radiograph) Mean WL (CBCT) Mean difference (EAL-CBCT) P values
Buccal 85 21.06 (±0.24) 21.2 (±0.24) -0.13 (±0.07) 0.058
Palatal 65 19.2 (±0.28) 19.4 (±0.29) -0.16 (±0.07) 0.034*
Mesial 3 20.33 (±1.2) 20.44 (±1.49) -0.4 (±0.28) 0.73
Distal 39 19.1 (±0.32) 19.06 (±0.30) 0.04 (±0.09) 0.68
Mesiobuccal 26 19.08 (±0.36) 19.05 (±0.38) 0.03 (±0.14) 0.835
Mesiolingual 13 18.84 (±0.6) 18.99 (±0.55) -0.15 (±0.13) 0.28
Distobuccal 17 17.94 (±0.42) 16.9 (±1.13) 1.03 (±1.01) 0.32