Skip to main content
. 2015 May 7;2015(5):CD007428. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007428.pub3

Comparison 4. Three‐dimensional (3D) plate versus superior plate for treating acute dislocated fractures.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Treatment failure (re‐operation for symptomatic delayed union) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Radiographic outcomes (fractures not healed at 4 months) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Adverse events ‐ participants with pain or functional impairment, or both ('symptomatic' participants) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 Symptomatic participants at intermediate follow‐up (4 months) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Symptomatic participants at long term follow‐up (12 months) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Length of surgery (hours) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Length of hospital stay (days) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected