Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 10;8:75. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00465-x

Table 4.

Sodium measurements from nine healthy participants using large and small ROIs and their association with breast density groups (≤ 50% (n = 10 breasts) and > 50% (n = 8 breasts))

Reader 1a Reader 2a
Non-dense breasts Dense breasts p-value Non-dense breasts Dense breasts p-value
Large ROI measurements
 Mean TSC (mmol/L) 46.1 ± 12.2 67.6 ± 12.7 0.002 49.8 ± 11.1 73.7 ± 14.0  < 0.001
 Min. TSC (mmol/L) 19.3 ± 7.7 21.8 ± 3.3 0.696 29.3 ± 6.5 31.6 ± 10.9 0.574
 Max. TSC (mmol/L) 68.2 ± 16.1 100.4 ± 16.3  < 0.001 68.8 ± 16.9 99.4 ± 16.0 0.001
 Mean FASC (mmol/L) 14.0 ± 5.8 21.2 ± 5.5 0.017 15.5 ± 5.8 23.2 ± 7.0 0.020
Small ROI measurements
 Mean TSC (mmol/L) 61.1 ± 14.8 93.4 ± 14.7  < 0.001 63.9 ± 15.0 92.2 ± 15.3 0.001
 Min. TSC (mmol/L) 54.1 ± 14.5 86.3 ± 16.5  < 0.001 58.0 ± 13.0 86.9 ± 15.6  < 0.001
 Max. TSC (mmol/L) 67.5 ± 16.2 98.9 ± 14.9  < 0.001 68.6 ± 16.6 96.4 ± 16.0 0.003
 Mean FASC (mmol/L) 21.1 ± 8.8 30.3 ± 11.2 0.067 20.0 ± 8.4 31.5 ± 8.9 0.012

FASC Fluid-attenuated sodium concentration, ROI Region of interest, TSC Total sodium concentration

Data are given as mean ± standard deviation. The p-value denotes the statistical difference between non-dense and dense breasts

aThe phantom’s signal intensity and B1 measurement measured by Reader 1 was used to minimise the effect of differences caused by phantom ROI placement that contributes to B1-corrected measurements