Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 10;96(1):250–280. doi: 10.1111/prd.12542

TABLE 5.

Oral microbiome‐based biomarker for OSCC

Authors/Year Source of biomarker Method Sample size Microbiome Findings
Katirachi et al. 140 N/D Systematic Review and meta‐analysis 5007 Human papillomavirus 6% (95% CI; 3%–10%) HPV prevalence in OSCC
Peter et al. 226 Swabs, Saliva, Tissue, Oral rinse and Tissue scraping Systematic review and meta‐analysis 970 Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, and Parvimonas Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Haemophilus and Granulicatella Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Mauceri et al. 227 Saliva Systematic review 1335 Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Neisseria flavescens, Fusobacterium periodonticum, Prevotella intermedia and Campylobacter spp, Enriched in OSCC compared to Control, but it was not possible to profile a specific microbiota associated with OSCC due to the great heterogeneity of the studies
Mun et al. 132 Saliva, Tissue, Oral rinse and Oral swab Systematic review 2809 Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes Enriched in OSCC compared to Control; All the studies identified microbial dysbiosis to be associated with OSCC
Melo et al. 141 Tissue Systematic review 383 Human papillomavirus 4.4% of the patients were HPV positive; None of the studies found had a control group
Lafuente Ibañez de Mendoza et al. 228 In vitro and In vivo Systematic review N/A Porphyromonas gingivalis Enriched in OSCC compared to Control; Bacterium involved in epithelial‐mesenchymal transition of malignant epithelial cells, neoplastic cell growth, proliferation and invasion
Ramos et al. 229 Saliva, Tissue, Oral rinse and Oral swab Systematic review 859 Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. Polymorphum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Enriched in OSCC compared to Control; Corroborated dysbiosis in OSCC. Enrichment of taxa associated with inflammation and production of acetaldehyde
She et al. 139 Tissue Systematic review 1119 Epstein–Barr virus Positive association with an increased risk of OSCC
Vyhnalova et al. 136 N/D Review article N/A Candida albicans, Candida etchellsii, Candida famata, Gibberella, Hannaella, Rhodotorula, mucilaginosa Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Aspergillus tamarii, Alternaria, Cladosporium, Halotolerans, Emericella, Malassezia restricta, Pichia anomala, Trametes Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Radaic et al. 8 Saliva and tissues Review article N/A Treponema denticola, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacteria Nucleatum, Tannarella Forsythia, Lactobacillus spp., Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Streptococcus mitis. Fusobacteria genera Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Streptococcus, Capnocytiphaga, Neisseria, Haemophillus and Aggreggatibacter Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Radaic & Kapila 120 N/D Review article N/A Candida mycotype, Treponema denticola, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacteria Nucleatum, Tannarella Forsythia Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Streptococcus mitis Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Malassezia mycotype, Streptococcus, Neisseria, Haemophillus and Aggreggatibacter Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Chattopadhyay et al. 133 N/D Review article N/A P. melaninogenica, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Lactobacillus vaginalis, L. gasseri: L. johnsonii, L. fermentum, L. salivarius, L. rhamnosus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, F. periodonticum, Streptococcus vestibularis, S. mitis, S. salivarius, Prevotella oris, and Rothia mucilaginosa Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Aggregatibacter, Lautropia, Haemophillus, Neisseria, Leptotrichia, P. jejuni: P. melaninogenica, and Prevotella pallens Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Perera et al. 128 Saliva, swab, and tissues Review article 885 Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Actinomyces, Propionibacterium spp., Candida albicans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus anginosus, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Streptococcus mitis, Micrococcus luteus, Prevotella melaninogenica, Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans, Fusobacterium naviforme, Staphylococcus aureus, Veillonella parvula, Bacteroides fragilis, Ralstonia insidiosa, Fusobacterium naviforme, Peptostreptococcus micros, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. tessellarius, Capnocytophaga sp. oral strain S3, Prevotella sp. oral clone BE073, Parvimonas sp. oral taxon 110, Eubacterium infirmum, Eubacterium brachy, Gemella haemolysans, Gemella morbillorum, Gemella sanguinis, Johnsonella ignava, Streptococcus parasanguinis I Peptostreptococcus stomatis, Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus salivarius Taxa associated with OSCC
Yang et al. 230 Saliva and whole blood 16S Sequencing 428 Lachnoanaerobaculum, Kingella, Parvimonas Enriched in OSCC compared to Control and correlated to genes in regulation of oncogenic and angiogenic responses
Gopinath et al. 231 Whole mouth fluid and Oral Swab 16S Sequencing 94 Enterobacteriae, Neisseria, Streptococcus and Fusobacteria, Prevotella, Treponema, Sphingomonas, Meiothermus, and Mycoplasma Enriched in OSCC compared to Control; Tumor surfaces elevated abundances of Porphyromonas, Enterobacteriae, Neisseria, Streptococcus and Fusobacteria, whereas Prevotella, Treponema, Sphingomonas, Meiothermus and Mycoplasma genera were significantly more abundant in deep tissue.
Gopinath et al. 232 Whole mouth fluid 16S Sequencing 74 Porphyromonas Correlated to OSCC
Megasphaera, unclassified Enterobacteria, Salmonella and Prevotella Correlated to OPMD
Streptococcus, Rothia and Fusobacterium Correlated to Control
Ganly et al. 233 Oral rinse 16S Sequencing 38 Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Alloprevotella Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Streptococcus Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Yang et al. 234 Oral rinse 16S Sequencing 248 Fusobacterium periodonticum, Parvimonas micra, Streptococcus constellatus, Haemophilus influenza, and Filifactor alocis (in contrast to decrease of Streptococcus mitis, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Porphyromonas pasteri, Veillonella parvula)

Enriched in OSCC compared to Control;

Higher complexity of oral microbiota communities in stage 4 patients

Hsiao et al. 235 Saliva 16S Sequencing 289 Prevotella tannerae, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Prevotella intermedia Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Streptococcus tigurinus Decreased compared to Control
Lee et al. 236 Saliva 16S Sequencing 376 Bacillus, Enterococcus, Parvimonas, Peptostreptococcus, and Slackia Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Al‐Hebshi et al. 237 Swabs and tissues 16S Sequencing 20 OSCC biopsies and 20 swabs F. nucleatum and P. aeruginosa Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Wang et al. 238 Saliva and oral swab 16S Sequencing 55 Porphyromonas and Solobacterium g Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Haemophilus, Corynebacterium, Cellulosimicrobium, and Campylobacter Decreased in OPMD compared to Control
Hu et al. 239 Non‐stimulated saliva 16S Sequencing 35 Haemophilus, and Bacillus Bacillus enriched in OSCC compared to Control, while Haemophilus Enriched in OPMD compared to Control
Streptococcus Decreased in OPMD and OSCC
Yost et al. 240 Oral swab Metatranscriptome sequencing 15 Genera Fusobacteria, Selenomonas, Capnocytophaga, Dialister, and Johnsonella (genus Bacillus; species Porphyromonas catoniae, Kingella denitricans, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, among others, were associated with healthy, tumor‐matching sites) Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Zhao et al. 241 Oral swab 16S Sequencing 80 Fusobacterium, Dialister, Peptostreptococcus, Filifactor, Peptococcus, Catonella and Parvimonas Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Nie et al. 242 Tissue 16S Sequencing 305 Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Campylobacter, Aggregatibacter, Lautropia, Asteroleplasma, Parvimonas, Peptostreptococcus, Pyramidobacter, Roseburia, and Propionibacterium Enriched in OSCC compared to Control. The microbiome was highly correlated with tumor clinicopathological features, with several genera
de Abreu et al. 148 Tissue Nested PCR 90 Human papillomavirus 3.3% of the OSCC patients were positive for HPV. All cases were HPV‐16
Nieminen et al. 243 Tissue Immunohistochemistry 149 Treponema denticola Dentilisin present in OSCC and the majority of orodigestive tumor samples
Perera et al. 244 Tissue ITS2 sequencing 52 C. albicans, C. etchellsii, and Hannaella luteola–like species Enriched in OSCC compared to Control
A Hanseniaspora uvarum–like species, Malassezia spp., Aspergillus tamarii, Cladosporium halotolerans, and Alternaria alternata Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Listyarifah et al. 245 Tissue Immunohistochemistry 60 Treponema Denticola Dentilisin present in 95% of OSCC tumor samples and 40% were immunopositive for dentilisin.
Shin et al. 246 Tissue 16S Sequencing 72 Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Streptococcus Fusobacterium enriched in OSCC compared to Control
Streptococcus Decreased in OSCC compared to Control
Kikuchi et al. 144 Tissue PCR 233 Epstein–Barr virus 50.2% of OSCC; 66.7% of severe dysplasia; 43.1% of mild dysplasia were positive for EBV.
Mokhtari & Beiraghdar 142 Tissue PCR 60 Herpes simplex‐1 5% of the OSCC patients were potivite for HSV
Saravani et al. 143 Tissue qPCR 48 Human Cytomegalovirus 6.3% of the OSCC patients were positive for HCMV
Harrandah et al. 135 In vivo ELISA and Western blot N/A Fusobacteria Mice infected with bacteria developed significantly larger and more numerous lesions compared to those not infected.
Kamarajan et al. 134 In vivo and in vitro Western blot N/A Treponema denticola, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Prophyromonas gingivalis Periodontal pathogens promote cancer aggressivity in mice via TLR2/MyD88 triggered activation of integrin/FAK signaling
Gallimidi et al. 129 In vivo and in vitro Immunohistochemistry N/A Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Prophyromonas gingivalis Periodontal pathogens promote cancer aggressivity in mice; Increased STAT3 and IL‐6 levels in infected mice compared to control