Skip to main content
. 2024 May 27;15:1407285. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1407285

TABLE 2.

Comparison of computational efficiency and capabilities of top HLA typing tools on whole exome data across studies.

Tool Number of HLA loci typed Resolution level Ranking in terms of memory usage Ranking in terms of runtime efficiency
HLA-HD 29 Up to 3 fields Best (1st) Best (1st)
HISAT-genotype 24 Up to 4 fields Good (2nd) Good (2nd)
HLA*LA 13 Up to 3 fields Fair (3rd) Fair (3rd)
Studies Thuesen et al., 2022; Claeys et al., 2023