Skip to main content
. 2000 Feb;74(4):1614–1622. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.4.1614-1622.2000

TABLE 4.

BAL cell types by H&E staining and by flow cytometry at days 2 and 4 post-B1 or -CP52 challenge of FI-PIV3-immune mice treated with nIg F(ab)2 or anti-SP F(ab)2 antibodies

Type of analysis Immunization + challenge + treatment Cell typeb Day 2 p.i.
Day 4 p.i.
Range, % positive Median % (P value)a Range, % positive Median % (P value)
H&E staining FI-PIV3 + B1 + nIg Macrophage 80–92 90 (>0.10) 81–97 88 (>0.10)
PMN 0–6 4 (>0.10) 5–10 4 (>0.10)
Eosinophil 0–3 1 (>0.10) 2–4 2 (>0.10)
Lymphocyte 2–10 5 (<0.05) 5–10 6 (<0.01)
FI-PIV3 + B1 + anti-SP Macrophage 80–95 87  84–90 85 
PMN 0 0  0–8 4 
Eosinophil 2–5 3  0–4 1 
Lymphocyte 5–15 10  10–14 10 
FI-PIV3 + CP52 + nIg Macrophage 90–98 96 (>0.10) 90–98 96 (<0.01)
PMN 0 0 (>0.10) 0–3 2 (>0.10)
Eosinophil 0 0 (>0.10) 0 0 (>0.10)
Lymphocyte 2–8 4 (>0.10) 2–4 2 (<0.01)
FI-PIV3 + CP52 + anti-SP Macrophage 88–98 95  80–88 84 
PMN 0 0  4–12 6 
Eosinophil 0 0  1–5 2 
Lymphocyte 4–10 5  6–14 8 
Flow cytometry FI-PIV3 + B1 + nIg CD4 20–28 26 (>0.10) 25–34 28 (>0.10)
CD8 10–15 12 (>0.10) 15–21 18 (<0.01)
B220 4–10 5 (>0.10) 9–14 10 (<0.01)
DX5 2–8 5 (<0.01) 0–8 5 (<0.01)
RB6-8C5 2–8 4 (>0.10) 2–10 5 (>0.10)
FI-PIV3 + B1 + anti-SP CD4 20–28 25  18–30 26 
CD8 8–20 15  10–15 12 
B220 3–6 4  2–10 5 
DX5 8–18 14  14–25 18 
RB6-8C5 2–11 7  5–10 6 
FI-PIV3 + CP52 + nIg CD4 18–25 22 (>0.10) 20–28 25 (>0.10)
CD8 8–15 10 (>0.10) 10–16 14 (>0.10)
B220 4–10 8 (>0.10) 4–8 5 (>0.10)
DX5 15–21 18 (>0.10) 20–26 24 (>0.10)
RB6-8C5 10–16 15 (<0.01) 10–22 19 (>0.10)
FI-PIV3 + CP52 + anti-SP CD4 21–28 26  22–32 26 
CD8 6–18 8  8–20 15 
B220 4–10 5  4–9 5 
DX5 14–18 15  20–25 22 
RB6-8C5 4–12 8  12–20 15 
a

For comparison between nIg and anti-SP-treated mice given the same challenge virus. 

b

A lymphocyte gate was used to select 10,000 events for CD3+ and B220+ lymphocytes; 10,000 ungated events were used for analysis of DX5+, RB6-8C5+, and CD11b+ cells.