Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;103(1):125–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02120.x

Table 5.

 Numbers and proportions of men with prostate cancer and high‐grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG‐PIN), based on an isoflavone intake administration and equol production (central pathology)

Equal producer Equal non‐producer
Isoflavone (n = 22) Placebo (n = 22) P‐value† Isoflavone (n = 20) Placebo (n = 25) P‐value†
No. of patients with tumors 5/22 (22.7%) 8/22 (36.4%) 0.255 4/20 (20.0%) 8/25 (32.0%) 0.288
Age (years)
 <64 1/9 (11.1%) 0/6 (0.0%) 0.600 1/8 (12.5%) 0/13 (0.0%) 0.381
 ≥65 4/13 (30.8%) 8/16 (50.0%) 0.293 3/12 (25.0%) 8/12 (66.7%) 0.049*
No. of positive cores
 1 4 7 0.641 2 2 0.727
 2–4 1 1 (1 vs 2–4) 4 4 (1 vs 2–4)
Gleason score
 6 2 6 3 6
 7 2 2 1 2
 8 0 0 0 0
 9 1 1 0 0
 5–6 2/5 (40.0%) 6/8 (75.0%) 0.250 3/4 (75.0%) 6/8 (75.0%) 0.764
 7–9 3/5 (60.0%) 2/8 (25.0%) (G6 vs 7–9) 1/4 (25.0%) 2/8 (25.0%) (G6 vs 7–9)
HG‐PIN 1/22 (4.6%) 4/22 (18.2%) 0.172 1/20 (5.0%) 4/25 (16.0%) 0.251

The Gleason score is the sum of the two most common histological patterns. †Fisher’s exact test; *P < 0.05.