Table 2.
Study | 1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? | 2. Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? | 3. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? | 4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? | 5. Were the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | 6. Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered? | 7. Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? | 8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | 9. Is there a clear statement of findings? | 10. How valuable is the research? | CASP quality rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bjornestad et al., 2019 [30] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Nhunzvi et al., 2019 [31] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Appiah et al., 2018 [32] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Wangensteen et al., 2022 [35] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Stokes et al., 2018 [36] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Shaari et al., 2023 [37] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Pettersen et al., 2023 [38] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Yang et al., 2015 [39] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Iswardani et al., 2022 [40] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Dundas et al., 2020 [41] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Brunelle et al., 2015 [42] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Rettie et al., 2020 [43] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
Martinelli et al., 2023 [44] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | High |
CASP, Critical Appraisal Skills Program.