Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 11;25(4):bbae282. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae282

Table 2.

Comparison of CryoSegNet with the template-based picking, Deep Picker, crYOLO, topaz, CASSPER and CryoTransformer in terms of the resolution of 3D density maps on CryoPPP test dataset. Bold font denotes the highest resolution

EMPIAR ID Number of Particles Average Resolution (Å)
Template-based Deep Picker CrYOLO Topaz CASSPER CryoTransformer CryoSegNet Template-based Deep Picker CrYOLO Topaz CASSPER CryoTransformer CryoSegNet
10028 32,183 30,242 31,699 35,514 15,637 40,488 45,218 4.12 4.09 4.11 3.97 4.43 3.86 2.72
10081 41,569 28,209 36,821 37,808 27,299 88,632 44,819 5.26 6.05 5.38 5.10 5.79 5.47 4.18
10345 14,353 2,470 11,369 21,343 9,876 105,739 15,209 4.07 9.13 3.94 3.66 5.14 6.43 2.89
11056 53,190 17,124 43,599 66,651 34,860 98,193 53,073 8.12 9.65 8.54 8.06 8.47 7.42 7.17
10532 43,662 28,711 29,434 38,372 29,290 148,345 30,155 3.93 4.92 4.10 4.27 3.96 3.92 3.92
10093 42,986 2,360 33,183 61,698 32,383 151,545 27,745 5.85 7.50 6.93 6.15 7.27 6.86 7.06
10017 49,770 23,462 47,704 45,511 38,460 43,735 10,026 5.00 5.63 4.87 5.09 5.33 5.61 6.91
Average 39,673 18,940 33,401 43,842 26,829 96,668 32,321 5.19 6.71 5.41 5.19 5.77 5.65 4.98