Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 7;12(6):4259–4268. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4085

TABLE 1.

Proximate composition, pH values and cooking loss of chicken samples.

Protein (%) Lipid (%) Moisture (%) Ash (%) pH Cooking loss
Raw 16.95 ± 0.04 9.64 ± 0.16 73.94 ± 0.47 0.91 ± 0.07 6.17 ± 0.99
EC (%)
0 (Control) 19.71 ± 2.90 7.93 ± 1.44 64.75 ± 1.39 1.32 ± 0.30 6.79 ± 0.10 31.5 ± 6.1
0.5 19.05 ± 2.61 7.81 ± 2.55 64.16 ± 2.09 1.45 ± 0.25 6.73 ± 0.07 31.1 ± 5.6
1 19.64 ± 2.60 6.99 ± 2.39 64.79 ± 1.99 1.28 ± 0.18 6.82 ± 0.10 32.1 ± 6.0
Significance ns ns ns ns ns ns
CT (°C)
150 19.10 ± 3.15 7.94 ± 1.55 66.48 ± 2.02a 1.23 ± 0.12a 6.80 ± 0.09 24.9 ± 1.1a
200 20.76 ± 2.53 6.98 ± 2.47 65.12 ± 2.23b 1.33 ± 0.18ab 6.79 ± 0.10 33.9 ± 1.3b
250 19.47 ± 2.16 8.24 ± 1.37 63.71 ± 1.34c 1.44 ± 0.22b 6.79 ± 0.11 37.8 ± 1.0c
Significance ns ns * * ns **
EC × CT * * ns * ns ns

Note: The values are given as mean ± standard deviation. *p < .05, **p < .01. Results with different letters (a–c) in the same column are significantly different.

Abbreviations: CT, cooking temperature (°C); EC, bitter melon extract concentration (%); ns, not significant.