Aducanumab |
2 trials of patients with MCI and confirmed amyloid pathology aged 50–85: 1638 subjects in EMERGE and 647 in ENGAGE. |
Primary objective met in EMERGE but not in ENGAGE–based on Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) |
i. ARIAs, were experienced by more than 40% of patients taking aducanumab and dose-dependent, of whom 7.5% were symptomatic (Sevigny et al., 2016). ARIASs were more frequent in patients carrying the ApoE4 allele, and most frequent for those who carry the ApoE4 4/4 versus 4/3 or 3/3 alleles (Kwan et al., 2020) |
i. Three FDA resigned alleging absence of evidence of effectiveness |
Mahase 2021a, b, c
|
IV (human MAB derived from a blood lymphocyte library of elderly people without any evidence of cognitive impairment)Biogen |
FDA approved June 2021 |
ii. Conflicting evidence from 2 trials presented at the November 2020 meeting of the FDA’s Peripheral and CNS Drug Advisory Committee meeting with some data favouring the placebo (Dr. Krudys) |
ii, 2021 not approved in Europe |
Budd Haeberlein et al. (2022)
|
Has strong avidity for epitope-rich insoluble amyloid plaques and oligomers rather than amyloid monomers. spares amyloid monomers, which have putative protective actions half-life of approximately 25 days (Beshir et al., 2022) |
July 2021 use restricted to MCI. |
iii. June 2022 Biogen withdraws review from Health Canada |
Arndt et al. (2018)
|
In early 2024 Biomega announces availability of aducanumab will end in late 2024 |
Tolar et al. (2020)
|
Decourt et al., 2021; Haddad et al., 2022
|
Whitehouse and Saini (2022)
|
Rahman et al. (2023)
|
Wojtunik-Kulesza et al. (2023)
|
Ackley et al., 2021
|
Richard et al. (2022)
|
Bapineuzumab (humanized MAB) |
2012: Failed two Phase III trials |
Failed to produce significant cognitive improvements; despite lowering Aβ, and also phosphorylate tau in CSF. |
First MAB to be associated with ARIA-E |
|
Miles et al. (2013)
|
Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson |
Discontinued 2013 |
6% developed aseptic meningitis |
Abushouk et al., 2017 |
SC |
Binds to the N-terminal of Aβ residues 1–5 |
Donanemab (humanized) |
TRAILBLAZER-ALZ Phase III trials |
Significant improvement noted at 76 weeks |
|
|
Mintun et al., 2021 |
Eli-Lilly |
Sims et al. (2023)
|
IV |
Selectively targets amyloid plaques. See also Table 2
|
Gantenerumab (human) |
2017 Failed in Phase III |
Reduced Aβ plaques but did not slow cognitive decline at 116 weeks |
|
|
Ostrowitzki et al., 2017 |
Hoffman-La-Roche |
2023 GRADUATE I and II trials |
Bateman et al. (2023) |
SC |
Targets insoluble plaques |
Lecanemab (human) |
approved by the FDA in July 2023 |
CLARITY AD trial with 1795 participants for 18 months. Moderately less decline based on CDR-SB scale |
ARIA-E and |
April 2023 ICER report raised concerns about cost-effectiveness of lecanemab for AD. |
Van Dyck et al. (2023)
|
IV |
ARIA-H and concerns over neuroinflammation and brain shrinkage, edema and some deaths |
Longer trials also recommended |
Couzin-Frankel & Piller (2022)
|
Biogen and Eisai |
ARIA higher in ApoE4 patients |
Piller (2022)
|
Targets both oligomers and plaques |
Couzin-Frankel, (2023)
|
See also Table 2
|
Solanezumab (humanized from mouse) |
Phase III EXPEDITION 1, EXPEDITION 2. showed + ve results, but failed in EXPEDITION 3. Also failed in The Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s (A4) study |
After 240 weeks there was no slowing of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease |
ARIA-E >1% in each group. ARIA-H in ∼30% and similar in placebo group |
Hoffman La Roche withdraws support in 2019 for continuation of trials with crenezumab |
Sperling et al. (2023)
|
Eli-Lilly |
Similarly, the 2014 phase II studies BLAZE and ABBY failed to show significant improvement with crenezumab |
In 2022 NIH stated that crenezumab failed for treatment of early onset AD. |
Cummings et al. (2018)
|
High affinity (picomolar) binding to monomeric aβ (amino acid sequence KLVFFAED) |
Highly homologous to crenezumab |
Genentech |
IV |