Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 24;2015(4):CD010663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010663.pub2

for the main comparison.

Surgical interventions compared with non‐surgical Interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Patient or population: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Settings: Anywhere
Intervention: Surgical intervention
Comparison: Non‐surgical intervention
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Non‐surgical interventions Surgical Interventions
Changes in trunk balance See comment See comment Not estimable 0 See comment We identified no randomised or non‐randomised prospective studies with a control group.
Progression of scoliosis See comment See comment Not estimable 0 See comment We identified no randomised or non‐randomised prospective studies with a control group.
Cosmetic issues See comment See comment Not estimable 0 See comment We identified no randomised or non‐randomised prospective studies with a control group.
Quality of life See comment See comment Not estimable 0 See comment We identified no randomised or non‐randomised prospective studies with a control group.
Back pain See comment See comment Not estimable 0 See comment We identified no randomised or non‐randomised prospective studies with a control group.
Disability See comment See comment Not estimable 0 See comment We identified no randomised or non‐randomised prospective studies with a control group.
Psychological issues See comment See comment Not estimable 0 See comment We identified no randomised or non‐randomised prospective studies with a control group.
CI: confidence interval
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.