Table 2.
Association of BMD with AIP in different models among all participants
| Exposure | a Total femur bone mineral density | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1[β(95%CI)] | Model 2[β(95%CI)] | Model 3[β(95%CI)] | |
| AIP(quartile) | |||
| Q1 | 1(Ref). | 1(Ref). | 1(Ref). |
| Q2 | 0.02 (0.01, 0.03) | 0.01 (-0.00, 0.02) | 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) |
| Q3 | 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) | 0.03 (0.02, 0.04) | 0.04 (0.03, 0.05) |
| Q4 | 0.08 (0.07, 0.09) | 0.06 (0.05, 0.07) | 0.06 (0.05, 0.07) |
| p for trend | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
| Exposure | a Femoral neck bone mineral density | ||
| Model 1[β(95%CI)] | Model 2[β(95%CI)] | Model 3[β(95%CI)] | |
| AIP(quartile) | |||
| Q1 | 1(Ref). | 1(Ref). | 1(Ref). |
| Q2 | 0.01 (-0.00, 0.02) | 0.01 (-0.00, 0.02) | 0.01 (-0.00, 0.02) |
| Q3 | 0.03 (0.02, 0.04) | 0.03 (0.02, 0.04) | 0.03 (0.02, 0.04) |
| Q4 | 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) | 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) | 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) |
| p for trend | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
| Exposure | a Lumbar spine bone mineral density | ||
| Model 1[β(95%CI)] | Model 2[β(95%CI)] | Model 3[β(95%CI)] | |
| AIP(quartile) | |||
| Q1 | 1(Ref). | 1(Ref). | 1(Ref). |
| Q2 | -0.0017 (-0.0130, 0.0096) | -0.0014 (-0.0123, 0.0096) | 0.0002 (-0.0105, 0.0109) |
| Q3 | 0.0164 (0.0049, 0.0278) | 0.0176 (0.0065, 0.0287) | 0.0212 (0.0103, 0.0322) |
| Q4 | 0.0351 (0.0236, 0.0467) | 0.0352 (0.0237, 0.0467) | 0.0414 (0.0299, 0.0528) |
| p for trend | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
Abbreviations: AIP, Atherogenic index of plasma; BMD, bone mineral density; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; PIR, family income-to-poverty ratio; CI, confidence intervals; SD, standard deviation
a Model 1 was adjusted for none; Model 2 was adjusted for age, Sex, race; Model 3 was adjusted for age, Sex, race, degree of education, income(PIR), Average alcoholic drinks per day last 12 Mth, ALT, AST, Total calcium, Serum creatinine, Ever been told you have osteoporosis brittle bones