Abstract
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by plaque accumulation in the arteries. Macrophages are immune cells that are crucial in the development of atherosclerosis. Macrophages can adopt different phenotypes, with the M1 phenotype promoting inflammation while the M2 phenotype counteracting it. This review focuses on the factors that drive the polarisation of M1 macrophages towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype during AS. Additionally, we explored metabolic reprogramming mechanisms and cytokines secretion by M1 macrophages. Hyperlipidaemia is widely recognised as a major risk factor for atherosclerosis. Modified lipoproteins released in the presence of hyperlipidaemia can trigger the release of cytokines and recruit circulating monocytes, which adhere to the damaged endothelium and differentiate into macrophages. Macrophages engulf lipids, leading to the formation of foam cells. As atherosclerosis progresses, foam cells become the necrotic core within the atherosclerotic plaques, destabilising them and triggering ischaemic disease. Furthermore, we discuss recent research focusing on targeting macrophages or inflammatory pathways for preventive or therapeutic purposes. These include statins, PCSK9 inhibitors, and promising nanotargeted drugs. These new developments hold the potential for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis and its related complications.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis, M1 macrophages, Metabolism, Nanomedicine
1. Introduction
Cardiovascular disease is a prevalent health issue worldwide, with atherosclerosis being its primary cause. Although atherosclerosis is more common among middle-aged and older individuals, the age of onset has gradually decreased. Annually, a staggering 20 million people worldwide die of atherosclerosis. Risk factors for atherosclerosis include obesity, diabetes, and other factors that exerts a significant burden on society and the economy [1].
Patients with diabetes are more prone to developing calcified plaques and lipid-rich necrotic cores in the carotid arteries than those without diabetes. Chronic hyperglycaemia in diabetic conditions disrupts vascular homeostasis, while the involvement of miRNAs can modulate transcription and protein expression, thereby contributing to atherosclerosis. Additionally, insulin deficiency may lead to increased intestinal cholesterol absorption and hypercholesterolaemia, causing lipoprotein retention in the vascular walls, ultimately triggering an inflammatory response and promoting the development of atherosclerosis [[2], [3], [4]].
In obesity, adipose tissue expansion, including perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT), contributes to localised inflammation and oxidative stress. These events cause the dysfunction of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells, ultimately facilitating atherosclerosis progression [5].
Immune cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), T lymphocytes, and B lymphocytes, actively regulate the inflammatory state of vessel walls. Macrophages can be categorised into two main phenotypes: M1 and M2. M1 macrophages exhibit pro-inflammatory activity, whereas M2 macrophages exhibit anti-inflammatory activity. Given that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory response, M1 macrophages play a significant role in its development.
2. Atherosclerosis and macrophages
2.1. Macrophages
Macrophages, derived from monocytes originating in the bone marrow, play crucial roles in the immune system, involved in a wide range of functions exhibiting anti-infectious, anti-tumour, and immunomodulatory properties. Macrophages are key players in both non-specific (innate immunity) and specific (cellular immunity) immunity. Their primary function is to phagocytose pathogens, senescent cells, and necrotic tissue fragments.
Upon the entry of foreign substances such as pathogens into the body, a local inflammatory response is triggered. Macrophages migrate to the site of inflammation, where they efficiently engulf and eliminate foreign invaders. Moreover, macrophages play a vital role in activating other immune cells, thereby enabling an effective response to pathogens. Ultimately, their actions assist in resolving inflammatory reactions, promote tissue repair, and facilitate healing.
Previously, classical macrophages were classified into M1 and M2 subtypes, along with additional subtypes such as Mox, Mhem, and M4 macrophages. The M2 macrophages were further divided into M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d subtypes [6]. M1 and M4 macrophages were believed to promote the development of atherosclerosis and unstable plaques, whereas M2, MHEM, and Mox macrophages exert protective effects by promoting tissue repair and plaque stability [7]. However, recent studies using scRNA-seq to examine macrophages in mouse atherosclerotic plaques have led to the reclassification of macrophages into five categories: resident-like macrophages, inflammatory macrophages, interferon-inducible macrophages, foamy Trem2 macrophages, and newly discovered cavity macrophages [8,9]. The markers are listed in Table 1. Depuydt et al. identified three macrophage subgroups in human carotid plaques: My0 and My1 cells, which are associated with inflammation, and anti-inflammatory My2 cells [10].
Table 1.
Recent classification of macrophages and their markers.
| Macrophages | Makers | References |
|---|---|---|
| Resident-like macrophages | Lyve1, Mrc1, Pf4 | Wang, Y et al., 2022 [8] Zernecke, A et al., 2020 [9] |
| Inflammatory macrophages | Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Ccl2, Ccl3, Ccl4, IL-1β, TNF-α | |
| Interferon-inducible macrophages | Ifit3, Irf7, Isg15 | |
| Foamy Trem2 macrophages | Mmp12, Mmp14, Itgax (CD11c), Abcg1, Trem2, Fabp4, Ctsd, Ctsl、Cd9, Spp1 | |
| Cavity macrophages | Cd226, Itgax (CD11c), Ccr2, Retnla |
2.2. M1 macrophages and atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease [11] with macrophages playing a central role in its development. Macrophage retention within the arterial wall is crucial for atherosclerosis [12]. It primarily depends on the accumulation of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) in the subendothelium following endothelial injury, and the subsequent aggregation and phagocytosis of lipids by monocyte-derived macrophages [13]. The dysregulation of the balance between lipid uptake and efflux by macrophages leads to the conversion of intracellular free cholesterol to cholesteryl esters (CEs). These accumulated CEs form foam cells [14], which are central to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis as they participate in the formation of lipid droplets.
Macrophages play a protective role in the early stages of lesions [12]. However, as macrophage apoptosis reduces cell density and inflammation, plaque progression slows down due to effective phagocytosis by neighbouring phagocytes. In advanced lesions, increased macrophage apoptosis and impaired clearance of apoptotic macrophages by neighbouring phagocytes promote the progression of inflammation and the development of necrotic cores within the lesion [15]. Studies on endarterectomy injury in advanced human atherosclerosis demonstrated Th1-dominant as the predominant macrophage type in the diseased atherosclerotic environment [16]. Th1 cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines that “classically” activate M1 macrophages [17].
M1 macrophages, in the presence of bacterial, fungal, or viral infections, can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) to clear pathogens. However, in the sterile inflammatory environment of atherosclerosis, M1 macrophages cause tissue damage and impair wound healing [18], thus contributing to the progression of atherosclerotic plaques.
3. Polarisation, metabolic reprogramming, and cytokine secretion in M1 macrophages
3.1. M1-type polarisation
Macrophages exhibit various phenotypes that are induced by different microenvironments. The concept of macrophage classification originated in the 1960s with the introduction of the term “classically activated” [19]. Macrophages derived from monocyte precursors ‘can be polarised into classically activated (M1) macrophages. Pro-inflammatory monocytes, such as LY6Chi monocytes, express high levels of the CC-chemokine receptor (CCR2) and are considered precursors of M1 macrophages [20].
In vitro, macrophage polarisation relies on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated activation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [21]. TLRs are recognition receptors that detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). High concentrations of saturated fatty acids and endotoxins can induce pro-inflammatory effects via TLR2 and/or TLR4, stimulating the polarisation of M1 macrophages, which mediate antimicrobial defence, tissue destruction, and other inflammatory effects [22,23]. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) promotes macrophage polarisation to the M1 phenotype [21]. Within human atherosclerotic lesions, M1 macrophages are primarily located in lipid-rich areas and in the vulnerable shoulder regions of plaques [17,24].
CD36, a transmembrane glycoprotein receptor expressed in macrophages, belongs to the scavenger receptor B family [25]. It mediates the uptake of oxidised low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) and the transport of free fatty acids [26]. Th1 lymphocytes recruit macrophages to obese adipose tissue in both humans and mice [22]. The lipid environment upregulates CD36 expression and promotes macrophage polarisation towards the M1 phenotype. Conversely, histone methylase G9a attenuates palmitate-induced M1 macrophage polarisation by negatively regulating CD36 expression [27]. Adipose tissue releases inflammatory mediators, including saturated fatty acids and cytokines, which stimulate macrophage differentiation into M128.
Furthermore, microRNAs (miRNAs), which are non-coding single-stranded RNA molecules approximately 22 nucleotides long, can bind to the 3′-untranslated region of target mRNAs in macrophages. This binding silences the associated genes, leading to translation blockage, regulating macrophage function at the genetic level. Certain miRNAs, such as miRNA-125, miRNA-146, miRNA-155, miRNA-let-7a/f, and miRNA-378 drive macrophage differentiation towards the M1 phenotype [29].
3.2. Metabolic reprogramming
Cellular metabolism and its associated products play crucial roles in regulating macrophage function and phenotype. Activation of M1 macrophages can influence the expression of inflammatory genes by utilising metabolites from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle within the cellular mitochondria, which participate in both energy metabolism and inflammation. Key metabolites such as succinate, citrate, and the electron transport chain are central to the activation of pro- or anti-inflammatory responses in macrophages [30].
Stimulation of macrophage polarisation towards M1 by LPS and tumour necrosis factor-gamma (TNF-γ) is associated with increased glycolysis, reduced TCA cycle activity, and reduced mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Type II interferons (e.g. IFN-γ) activate classical M1 macrophages, IFN-γ increases aerobic glycolysis within a few minutes and subsequently decreases OXPHOS after a few hours. This metabolic switch enables M1 macrophages to tolerate lower mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. ATP produced by glycolysis is essential for maintaining type II interferon-induced Janus tyrosine kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription 1JAK-STAT-1) signalling. Moreover, M1-activated macrophages produce nitric oxide (NO) via the JAK-STAT1 pathway, aided by the upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase [31]. NO impairs mitochondrial function and promotes glycolysis mediated by nitrosative target proteins [32].
The activation of the macrophage M1 phenotype is regulated by nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB), a transcription factor that induces the expression of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (HIF-1α). In addition, HIF-1α triggers changes in the cellular metabolic phenotype by promoting glycolysis and inhibiting OXPHOS [30,33]. This shift in metabolism is facilitated by the upregulation of lactate dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, resulting in compromised TCA cycle activity and the accumulation of isocitrate and succinate. Excess citrate can be used for lipid synthesis via acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) [34]. Glutamine replenishes TCA intermediates downstream of citrate, whereas gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) shunting facilitates the conversion of glutamine to succinate, contributing to the succinate pool in M1 macrophages [35]. Succinate accumulation further stabilises HIF-1α by inhibiting proline hydroxylase activity, subsequently leading to the induction of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) production and ROS generation. This allows glucose metabolism to be linked to the pro-inflammatory properties of M1 macrophages [34,[36], [37], [38]]. Moreover, the inhibition of GABA transaminase by vigabatrin reduces glutamine-derived succinate, stabilises HIF-1α, and decreases IL-1β secretion by macrophages [35]. Disruption of the TCA cycle enhances the production of lactate, purines, and pyrimidines, providing NADPH with the ability to activate the NADPH oxidase system (Nox) in macrophages, thereby promoting inflammatory responses and tissue damage [29,39]. The interaction between NO and ROS also leads to the production of reactive nitrogen species such as peroxynitrite, which can impair NO bioavailability and damage extracellular proteins [40]. (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Metabolism of M1 macrophages
Illustration of the metabolic changes occurring in M1 macrophages. Upon stimulation by LPS, M1 macrophages exhibit increased glycolysis. The pentose phosphate pathway generates nucleotides, amino acids, and NADPH, which in turn stimulates the expression of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) to produce nitric oxide (NO). Meanwhile, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle is inhibited, leading to the accumulation of citrate and succinate. The accumulation of citrate can be redirected towards lipid synthesis, leading to NO production. Glutamine supplementation enhances the utilisation of TCA cycle intermediates downstream of citrate, particularly succinic acid. Additionally, glutamine stabilises HIF-1α, promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and triggers the production of related molecules like IL-1β in the nucleus. INF-γ generates NO through the JAK-STAT1 pathway. PPP, pentose phosphate pathway; OAA, oxaloacetic acid; FAS, fatty acid synthetase (Created with BioRender.com).
To compensate for interruptions in the TCA cycle and prevent excessive carbon accumulation from succinate, the aspartate-arginine shunt converts aspartate to oxaloacetate via aspartate aminotransferase. Additionally, this shunt can link TCA cycle metabolites such as fumarate, malate, and oxaloacetate to NO synthesis [35]. Inhibition of the shunt using the aspartate aminotransferase inhibitor, aminooxyacetic acid, reduces NO and interleukin-6 production in M1 macrophages [36].
Gene microarray analyses revealed that M1-activated bone marrow-derived macrophages exhibited altered gene expression patterns associated with metabolic changes within cells. The upregulation of glucose transporter protein (GLUT1), hexokinase 3 (HK3), 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3), phosphor glucose translocase 2 (PGM2), and enolase 2 (ENO2) confirmed the increased glycolysis observed in M1 macrophages [34].
3.3. Secreted cytokines
M1 macrophage activation can upregulate several genes, including interferon-induced genes and interferon modulators, which positively regulate macrophage activation and polarisation, which in turn leads to the expression of M1-philic genes such as IL-12 [41,42]. In recent years, largely based on mouse studies, IL-4 and IL-10 have been suggested to be hallmarks of M2-type macrophage polarisation. However, Gharib et al. based on the high complexity of macrophage transcriptional profiles, observed that IL-10 in response to LPS, exerts the opposite effect on IL-4, thereby promoting the activation and polarisation of human monocyte-derived macrophages to produce pro-inflammatory factors. This suggests interspecies variability in cytokine production by M1/M2 macrophages, which may be attributed to the interferon signalling pathway [23].
In diet-induced atherosclerotic mice, cholesterol crystals were observed early in the lesion area. These cholesterol crystals induce the activation of macrophage caspase-1, hexokinase 1, and pyruvate kinase M2, leading to the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. This activation facilitates the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from the IL-1 family (such as IL-1β and IL-18) [33,43]. Adipose tissue macrophages (ATM) further amplify the inflammatory response by increasing the production of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-6, and IL-1β, as well as actively secreting chemokines like monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) and LTB4, which facilitates the recruitment of additional monocytes [44]. Moreover, once circulating monocytes are recruited, pro-inflammatory macrophages secrete additional chemokines, further enhancing the inflammatory response, accelerating the development of atherosclerotic lesions, and creating a positive feedback mechanism [22,28].
Finally, macrophages that transform into foam cells produce matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), followed by macrophage death, resulting in the transformation of lipid pools into necrotic cores. MMPs break down the extracellular matrix in plaques, resulting in the thinning of fibrous cap tissue [45] (Fig. 2). In particular, MMP9 has been demonstrated, via Mendelian randomisation studies, to be causally associated with atherosclerosis risk when present at high levels in the circulation [46].
Fig. 2.
Cytokines secreted by M1 macrophages
Early formation of cholesterol crystals in plaques activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in macrophages, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18. As the plaque progresses, adipose tissue macrophages (ATMs) continue to release pro-inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, to sustain the inflammatory response. In addition, chemokines, such as MCP-1 and LTB4, are released paracrine or endocrine by ATMs around blood vessels to facilitate the recruitment of additional monocytes to the lesion site. As the disease progresses, macrophages, particularly MMP9, contribute to extracellular matrix degradation by secreting matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). HK: hexokinase 1; PK: pyruvate kinase; CC: cholesterol crystal (Created with BioRender.com).
4. Mechanisms of AS promotion by M1 macrophages
4.1. Recruitment of inflammatory cells
Hyperlipidaemia is recognised as a significant risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis. An elevation in plasma LDL leads to atherosclerosis in all mammals. Under otherwise equal conditions, the higher the LDL level, the faster the progression of plaque formation [47]. LDL concentrations exceeding physiological levels can cause the lipoproteins present in the arterial wall to undergo various modifications (such as oxidation and enzymatic degradation), rendering them pro-inflammatory. These modified lipoproteins subsequently activate the overlying vascular endothelial cells, leading to increased recruitment of monocytes into the plaques [20].
When cholesterol efflux in macrophages is hindered, the expression of the common β-subunit of interleukin-3 (IL-3) and the GM-CSF receptor on haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) is heightened. This increase in HSPCs results in the amplification of monocyte precursor cells, thereby augmenting the likelihood of monocyte recruitment [48]. Monocyte recruitment is influenced by various factors, including CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1, is an essential chemokine involved in the initiation of inflammatory responses and crucial for the early stages of monocyte recruitment. MCP-1, in conjunction with IL-8 or CXC ligand-8, triggers the adhesion of monocytes to vascular endothelial cells within the vasculature. Additionally, various adhesion molecules expressed on monocytes, such as LFA1, PSGL1, CD31, VLA-4, and CD62L, facilitate adhesion by interacting with endothelial cells. The early stages of monocyte recruitment play a dominant role in lesion progression and are necessary for the development of atherosclerotic plaques [29,49].
4.2. Foam cell formation
Excessive uptake of modified LDL by macrophages and subsequent cholesterol accumulation within these cells are the primary causes of foam cell formation and play crucial roles in all stages of atherosclerosis development [50]. Single-cell RNA sequencing of neonatal aortic leukocytes revealed a unique genetic signature of macrophages, termed as the aortic intimal macrophage (MacAIR) population, representing the cells that first differentiate into foam macrophages [51]. Mononuclear macrophages secrete protein-modifying enzymes that further modify lipids and promote the secretion of these enzymes, creating a positive feedback loop during the initiation of atherosclerosis [52].
During atherosclerosis, vascular permeability to LDL increases, and lectin-like oxidised lipoprotein-1 (LOX-1) expression is upregulated. The expression of dynein core glycoprotein 1 (DSG1) and dynein core glycoprotein 2 (DSC2), components of intercellular junctions, is reduced by LOX-1, which weakens the junctions and increases the transfer of ox-LDL between cells. Protein kinase C regulates the blockade of a key component of intercellular tight junctions and protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 14A (PPP1R14A), leading to increased vascular endothelial permeability [[53], [54], [55]].
Macrophages express scavenger receptors on their surfaces, including SR-A1, CD36, and LOX-1, which interact with lipoproteins to uptake circulating lipids. Additionally, they express reverse transporters, such as ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-B1, to efflux intracellular lipids [53]. The expression of SR-A1 can stimulate the upregulation of the voltage-dependent K+ channel Kv1.3, leading to increased uptake of ox-LDL [56]. Inhibition of ubiquitin-specific peptide 9x-linked (USP9X) attenuates SR-A1 deubiquitination and promotes its internalisation, facilitating foam cell formation and inflammatory responses [57]. Additionally, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) mediates the upregulation of CD146 by ox-LDL in macrophages; CD146 activates pro-inflammatory activity and promotes foam cell formation by interacting with CD36. This effect is further enhanced over time by oxLDL. The presence of CD146 on macrophages not only contributes to the development of atherosclerotic plaques, but also hinders macrophage migration, leading to their retention and ultimately enhancing atherosclerotic plaque complexity [58]. The trigger receptor expressed on myeloid cell 2 (TREM2) promotes lipid influx and foam cell formation by upregulating CD36 in macrophages [59]. Deficiency of nuclear factor of activated T-cell (NFAT) family protein c3 (NFATc3) leads to an increase in SR-A and CD36 expression, resulting in increased lipid uptake and foam cell formation in macrophages [60].
Pro-inflammatory activation of macrophages upregulates hypoxia-inducible lipid droplet-associated protein (HILPDA), promoting the degradation of triglyceride lipase (ATGL), a key enzyme in triglyceride hydrolysis, leading to increased accumulation of triglycerides in macrophages. HILPDA has a similar effect on ATGL as ATGL inhibitors, increasing endogenous HILPDA levels, decreasing ATGL expression, and increasing intracellular fat [61].
Collectively, during atherosclerosis, increased vascular endothelial permeability, upregulated expression or function of scavenger receptors on macrophages (particularly SR-A and CD36), and the degradation of intracellular lipases collectively contribute to intracellular lipid accumulation, transforming macrophages into foam cells, which are key features of the early stages of atherosclerosis formation.
4.3. Plaque progress
Foam cells play an important role in atherosclerosis. These cells secrete the extracellular matrix, leading to the retention of lipoproteins and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, consequently enhancing the recruitment of more inflammatory cells. During the early stages of atherosclerosis, lipid-filled foam cells undergo apoptosis and are cleared by anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages via efferocytosis [62]. However, excessive phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by macrophages can induce endoplasmic reticulum stress, leading to macrophage death, and the release of lipids and metalloproteinases [63]. The formation of a thick fibrous cap rich in extracellular matrix contributes to the stability of atherosclerotic plaques. M2 macrophages are part of the fibrous cap, especially when vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), the main source of the fibrous cap, are reduced. Macrophage-to-mesenchymal-transformed macrophages play a larger role but cannot fully compensate for the loss of SMCs [64].
With the progression of the lesion, the ability of anti-inflammatory macrophages to phagocytose apoptotic cells is impaired, resulting in the accumulation of apoptotic macrophages and the formation of highly inflammatory necrotic cores [62]. The well-known macrophage phagocytic receptor c-Mer tyrosine kinase (MerTK) mediates phagocytosis by anti-inflammatory macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions. Cleavage of MerTK increases plaque necrosis, whereas resolvin D1 (RvD1) inhibits MerTK cleavage, reduces plaque necrosis, and improves phagocytosis [65]. The reduced expression of MerTK and impaired phagocytosis in macrophages in advanced atherosclerotic lesions have been associated with increased levels of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase γ (CaMKIIγ) [66]. Another mechanism hindering phagocytosis is the decreased expression of the “Eat me” signalling molecule calreticulins on the surface of diseased cells. In addition, decreased binding of “Eat me” ligands on the surface of cells by ox-LDL or oxidised phospholipid autoantibodies, further impairs phagocytosis [62,67]. CD47, significantly upregulated in atherosclerotic plaques, and its ligand, macrophage signal-regulating protein-alpha (SIRP-α), inhibit macrophage phagocytosis, contributing to decreased phagocytic activity [68], thereby promoting the formation of necrotic cores in atherosclerotic plaques, ultimately increasing the risk of plaque rupture.
Monocyte recruitment occurs during all stages of atherosclerosis. However, monocytes are unable to penetrate deep into the plaque, and advanced lesions are primarily composed of proliferating macrophages derived from monocytes [49,69,70]. The activation of the serine/threonine protein kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) during cell proliferation is one mechanism by which pro-inflammatory macrophages activate HIF-1α. This promotes atherosclerosis progression by increasing the expression of glycolytic and inflammatory genes [71].
As M1 macrophages play a crucial role in the progression of atherosclerosis, targeting their function may present new opportunities for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition.
5. M2 macrophages and atherosclerosis
Activated M1 macrophages are crucial for the progression of atherosclerosis, whereas alternatively activated M2 macrophages influence the regression of atherosclerosis. M2 macrophages are primarily activated by IL-4 and IL-13 through JAK-STAT, PPAR, AMPK, and/or transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathways to produce anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and pro-fibrotic factors like fibronectin, insulin-like growth factor, and TGF-β to promote inflammation resolution and tissue repair in opposition to the pro-inflammatory effects of M1 macrophages. Surface markers of M2 macrophages include mannose receptor (CD206) and arginase-1 (Arg-1) positivity within the CD68 cell subset [12,72]. Studies on atherosclerosis regression in mice have demonstrated that a characteristic of plaque regression is the decrease in lesion macrophage content, upregulation of markers of M2 macrophages such as Arg-1 and CD163, and a reduction in CCL2 and TNF-α mRNA levels, indicating the predominant role of M2 macrophages during lesion regression [12,14]. Recent research suggests that the continual recruitment of Ly6chi inflammatory monocytes and their polarisation to the M2 state, dependent on STAT6, are essential for resolving atherosclerotic inflammation and promoting plaque regression [73]. These findings highlight the crucial role of M2 macrophages in atherosclerosis regression.
M1 and M2 macrophages exhibit distinct metabolic differences. While M1 macrophages rely on increased glycolysis, M2 macrophages predominantly rely on fatty acid oxidation. Notably, although one of the characteristic features of M2 macrophages is increased fatty acid oxidation, this process depends on glucose to drive the TCA cycle and on OXPHOS for energy production (fatty acid oxidation can supplement acetyl-CoA). This metabolic pathway enables efficient and sustainable energy production, which is essential for the anti-inflammatory and tissue repair functions of M2 macrophages (Fig. 3) [33,36]. Another metabolic feature of M2 macrophages is the upregulation of arginase-1, which metabolises l-arginine into l-ornithine and urea, subsequently resulting in the generation of polyamines and l-proline, both crucial for the promotion of wound healing and tissue repair by M2 macrophages [33,74].
Fig. 3.
Metabolism of M2 macrophages
Illustration of the metabolism of M2 macrophages. IL-4 stimulates macrophage polarisation towards the M2 phenotype. Glucose drives the upregulation of the TCA cycle, while glycolysis down-regulates it. Fatty acids enter the cell and enhance fatty acid oxidation, providing the acetyl coenzyme A required for the TCA cycle, thereby increasing oxidative phosphorylation and resulting in the production of a large amount of ATP required for tissue repair. ETC: electron transport chain (Created with BioRender.com).
6. Novel atherosclerosis treatment strategies
Lipid-lowering therapy is the fundamental approach to treating atherosclerotic diseases, and its effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular events is directly related to an absolute decrease in LDL cholesterol levels. According to European guidelines, statins are recommended as the primary drugs for lipid lowering, and their efficacy in reducing LDL levels can range from 30 to 50 %, depending on the type, dosage, and effectiveness of the statin used. In patients with diabetes, statins can be combined with fibrates to provide additional benefits [75]. Notably, in patients with high cholesterol levels, PCSK9 inhibitors are also necessary because PCSK9 plays a significant role in the regulation of lipid metabolism. PCSK9 inhibitors not only reduce circulating LDL levels but also inhibit the uptake of LDL cholesterol by arterial macrophages. Moreover, PCSK9 affects atherosclerosis independent of cholesterol levels. PCSK9 also stimulates monocyte migration to the atherosclerotic areas. Recombinant PCSK9 promotes the transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β and inhibits the mRNA levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages. Inhibition of PCSK9 can suppress the inflammatory response of M1 macrophages, thereby attenuating atherosclerosis [76,77]. Monoclonal antibodies, peptide inhibitors, and PCSK9 silencing are some methods used to inhibit PCSK9. Two complete human anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies, alirocumab and evocumab, have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia, or ASCVD, in patients requiring further LDL-C reduction. These drugs can significantly reduce LDL-C levels (50 % reduction in monotherapy and 70 % reduction when combined with statins) and exhibit good safety profiles [77]. Recently, a new dual-stranded siRNA, called inclisiran, was developed to block PCSK9 via the degradation of PCSK9 mRNA, leading to the lowering of LDL-C concentrations in the plasma [78]. Other novel developments include three main types of PCSK9 vaccines: Peptide Vaccine AT04A (which not only reduces LDL-C but also decreases pro-inflammatory factors), Nanoliposome Anti-PCSK9 Vaccine L-IFPTA+ (which induces higher and more persistent anti-PCSK9 antibody titres compared to peptide vaccines), and Virus-Like Particle (VLP) Peptide Vaccines Anti-PCSK9 Qβ-003 (which reduces lipid levels and also exhibits anti-fibrotic effects related to regulating fatty acid β-oxidation) [78,79].
Although lowering cholesterol levels alone has demonstrated potential benefits, some studies suggest that it may not be sufficient to completely prevent adverse cardiovascular events [80]. A notable characteristic of atherosclerotic regression is the extensive changes observed in the transcriptomes of plaque macrophages [7]. Macrophages are not strictly categorised as M1 or M2; rather, they exhibit plasticity and can be reprogrammed and transitioned between the two phenotypes [6,81]. Understanding the mechanisms that regulate macrophage phenotypes can significantly contribute to the development of novel therapeutic approaches. For instance, ATF3, a transcription factor induced by HDL, inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines [82]. TFKLF4 can convert pro-inflammatory macrophages into anti-inflammatory activated macrophages [83]. In vivo knockouts of HDAC3 [84] and HDAC9 [85] in mice promoted plaque stability and attenuated atherosclerosis. In Ldlr−/− deficient murine peritoneal macrophages, the expression of KDM6B [86] improves plaque stability. Additionally, modified LDL induces expression of microRNA hsa-let-7d-5p in macrophages, which inhibits its target gene high mobility group AT hook 2 (HMGA2), ultimately reducing foam cell production and conferring anti-resistance to atherosclerosis [87,88].
In addition to lipid-lowering therapy, maintaining the balance between macrophage pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory activities is crucial in determining the final outcome of atherosclerosis [89]. Targeting inflammatory pathways is a promising and novel therapeutic approach. While inflammation resolution was previously considered a passive process, recent studies have demonstrated its highly coordinated and proactive nature [90]. Specific pro-catabolic mediators (SPM), which are synthesised by various cells, including macrophages, have been shown to inhibit initiation of atherosclerosis, inactivate NLRP3 inflammatory vesicles, inhibit inflammation progression, contribute to inflammation resolution, enhance macrophage phagocytosis, and promote atherosclerotic plaque stability [89,91,92]. SPMs are metabolites of polyunsaturated fatty acids, including fatty acid enzymes, such as lipoxygenase (LOX), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and cytochrome P450. They mainly belong to four families: lipoxins (LX), resolvins (Rv), protectins (PD), and maresins (MaR) [93]. SPMs and membrane-associated protein A1 can promote macrophage polarisation towards the M2 phenotype via the ALX/FPR2 signalling pathway. MaR1 may serve as an endogenous ligand for the nuclear receptor ROR, regulating macrophage M2 polarisation and promoting inflammation resolution [89,94]. The interaction between RvD1 and GPR32/DRV1 stimulates the synthesis of mi-R-208a in macrophages, resulting in elevated IL-10 levels. Additionally, it can increase the synthesis of miR-146b, which inhibits NF-κB transcription, thereby suppressing inflammation [93]. MerTK, a tyrosine kinase, acts as a receptor for macrophage efferocytosis. It increases the levels of non-phosphorylated cytosolic 5-LOX, inhibits the activity of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase I (CaMKII), and promotes the production of SPMs by macrophages. ADAM17, which is involved in atherosclerosis, cleaves MerTK. Administration of RvE1 in atherosclerosis-prone mice reduces ADAM17 expression, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels, and promotes macrophage polarisation towards the M2 phenotype [92,93]. In addition, SPMs recruit macrophages and enhance their efferocytic capacity. Efferocytosis, in turn, promotes the production of SPMs in macrophages, forming a positive feedback process for inflammation resolution [92]. In advanced cases of AS with deficient SPM levels, exogenous administration of SPM could be considered [95]. In addition to SPMs, canakinumab (a monoclonal antibody targeting the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β) has demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects independent of lipid action [96]. Therefore, anti-inflammatory therapies hold promise as a new treatment option for atherosclerosis.
However, several inflammatory pathways are systemic, and inhibiting inflammatory factors while reducing cardiovascular events can increase the risk of infection owing to immunosuppression. Recently, nanoparticle-assisted treatment of atherosclerosis significantly improved its therapeutic efficacy and reduced systemic side effects [97]. For example, lipid nanoparticles encapsulating CCR2 siRNA target LY6Chi monocytes, reducing the recruitment of M1 precursor macrophages, and alleviating inflammation in lesion [98,99]. Recombinant HDL nanoparticles carrying an inhibitor of the CD40−CD40L cascade between monocytes and macrophages have been found to reduce inflammation by decreasing circulating monocyte recruitment without affecting other immune functions of macrophages [100,101]. Wang et al. discovered that rapamycin, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of the rapamycin pathway, when loaded in poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles coated with red blood cell membranes, exhibits improved accumulation within the atherosclerotic plaques, thereby inhibiting macrophage proliferation and enhancing plaque stability [102]. Engineered platelet-derived extracellular vesicles loaded with the NLRP3 inflammatory vesicle inhibitor MCC950 can target macrophage-derived foam cells to inhibit macrophage proliferation and reduce local inflammation [103]. Controlled-release polymer nanoparticles encapsulating Ac2-26, a peptide targeting the ALX/FPR2 pathway at atherosclerotic sites by adding collagen IV (Col IV)-binding peptides, have been shown to alleviate inflammation, suppress collagenase activity, and stabilize plaques at atherosclerotic sites [95,104]. Moreover, polyethylene glycol-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes with CD47-SIRP-α inhibitors reactivate phagocytosis by M1 macrophages and slow plaque progression when targeted to atherosclerotic plaques [68] (Table 2).
Table 2.
The latest nanomedicine for the treatment of atherosclerosis.
| Ingredients | Package | Target | Consequence | Experiment Subject |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCR2 siRNA [98,99] | Lipid | LY6Chi Monocyte | Release recruitment | Apoe −/− mice |
| CD40-TRAF6 Inhibitor [100,101] | rHDL-MHPC-DMPC | Macrophage CD40−CD40L | Release recruitment | Apoe −/− mice |
| RAP Inhibitor [102] | PLGA- RV | mTOR Pathway | Inhibit macrophage proliferation | Apoe −/− mice |
| Ac2-2695,104 | NPs-Col IV | ALX/FPR2 Pathway | Stabilize plaque | Ldlr−/− mice |
| CD47-SIRP-α Inhibitor [68] | PEG-SWNTs | LY6Chi Monocyte | Recover efferocytosis | Apoe −/− mice |
| MCC950 [103] | PEV | Foam cell | Inhibit macrophage proliferation | ApoE-KO mice |
*MHPC: phospholipids 1myristoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-phosphocholine, DMPC: 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine, PLGA: Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid, RV: RBC vesicles, NPs: Nanoparticles, Col IV: Collagen IV, PEG: Polyethylene glycol, SWNTs: Single-walled carbon nanotubes, PEV: Platelet-derived extracellular vesicles.
Although lipid-lowering therapy remains the cornerstone of atherosclerosis treatment, exhibiting a good curative effect, cardiovascular disease still accounts for the majority of global deaths [105]. Therefore, there is a need to explore new therapeutic approaches that target the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying atherogenesis. Targeted nanomedicines offer the advantages of efficacy and safety, and significant progress has been made in macrophage-targeted nanomedicine research in recent decades. Most of these drugs are currently in animal or preclinical stages. Despite these challenges, nanomedical therapeutics represent a major breakthrough in the treatment of atherosclerosis.
7. Summary
Atherosclerosis is a cardiovascular disease that threatens human health. Mechanistically, apart from the dysfunction of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells that contribute to atherosclerosis, macrophages, especially M1 macrophages, also play a significant role in its progression. M1 macrophages primarily promote the development of atherosclerosis through inflammatory pathways, including inflammatory responses and positive feedback mechanisms. In contrast, anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages play a crucial role in atherosclerosis regression.
Currently recognised methods for treating atherosclerosis typically involve reducing low-density lipoprotein levels in the bloodstream using common approaches, including statins, PCSK9 inhibitors, and ezetimibe. In addition to lipid-lowering therapies, targeting the pro-inflammatory activity of M1 macrophages could offer a new perspective for atherosclerosis treatment. While inhibition of inflammation can alleviate atherosclerotic lesions, it may also lead to systemic immunosuppression. The emergence of nanomedicine has addressed this challenge by enabling precise targeting of lesions using specific nanomaterials and bioenvelopes, thereby slowing disease progression.
Although a substantial amount of research has explored the relationship between macrophages and atherosclerosis, several aspects of the disease remain unexplored. Advancements in technology have improved the classification of macrophages; however, the lack of standardised classification criteria may pose challenges for future studies. Furthermore, owing to the complexity of alternatively activated macrophages, the mechanism by which they promote lesion regression is unclear, despite their crucial role in its progression. Finally, the predominance of atherosclerosis studies using mouse models may not fully reflect disease progression in humans.
Despite these limitations, I believe that with technological advancements, studies on the role of macrophages in the progression or regression of atherosclerosis will continue to improve, providing new insights into its diagnosis and treatment.
Sources of funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 82370457]; the Key Research and Development Project of Jiangsu Province [grant numbers BE2022780]; Postgraduate Research&Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [grant numbers KYCX22_3712]; Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [grant numbers KYCX23_3754].
Data availability statement
Question: Has data associated with your study been deposited into a publicly available repository?
Response: NO.
Question: Has data associated with your study been deposited into a publicly available repository?
Response: No data was used for the research described in the article.
Ethics declarations
Review and/or approval by an ethics committee was not needed for this study because this is a review.
Informed consent was not required for this study because this is a review.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Bo Yang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Sanhua Hang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Siting Xu: Writing – review & editing. Yun Gao: Writing – review & editing. Wenhua Yu: Writing – review & editing. Guangyao Zang: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. Lili Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. Zhongqun Wang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.
Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT in order to improve readability and language. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the publication.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Contributor Information
Bo Yang, Email: 2222213012@ujs.edu.cn.
Sanhua Hang, Email: 1770346125@qq.com.
Siting Xu, Email: 2212213030@ujs.edu.cn.
Yun Gao, Email: 2222213176@ujs.edu.cn.
Wenhua Yu, Email: 2222213052@ujs.edu.cn.
Guangyao Zang, Email: 2112013012@ujs.edu.cn.
Lili Zhang, Email: 2112113014@ujs.edu.cn.
Zhongqun Wang, Email: wangzhongqun@ujs.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Herrington W., Lacey B., Sherliker P., Armitage J., Lewington S. Epidemiology of atherosclerosis and the potential to reduce the global burden of atherothrombotic disease. Circ. Res. 2016;118(4):535–546. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gao X., Song J., Watase H., Hippe D.S., Zhao X., Canton G., Tian F., Du R., Ji S., Yuan C., CARE-II Investigators Differences in carotid plaques between symptomatic patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019;39(6):1234–1239. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.312092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.La Sala L., Prattichizzo F., Ceriello A. The link between diabetes and atherosclerosis. European J. Preventive Cardiol. 2019;26(2_suppl):15–24. doi: 10.1177/2047487319878373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cortés V., Eckel R.H. Insulin and bile acids in cholesterol homeostasis: new players in diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2022;145(13):983–986. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.058883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hu H., Garcia-Barrio M., Jiang Z., Chen Y.E., Chang L. Roles of perivascular adipose tissue in hypertension and atherosclerosis. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2021;34(9):736–749. doi: 10.1089/ars.2020.8103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Colin S., Chinetti-Gbaguidi G., Staels B. Macrophage phenotypes in atherosclerosis. Immunol. Rev. 2014;262(1):153–166. doi: 10.1111/imr.12218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barrett T.J. Macrophages in atherosclerosis regression. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020;40(1):20–33. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang Y., Wang Q., Xu D. New insights into macrophage subsets in atherosclerosis. J. Mol. Med. 2022;100(9):1239–1251. doi: 10.1007/s00109-022-02224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zernecke A., Winkels H., Cochain C., Williams J.W., Wolf D., Soehnlein O., Robbins C.S., Monaco C., Park I., McNamara C.A., Binder C.J., Cybulsky M.I., Scipione C.A., Hedrick C.C., Galkina E.V., Kyaw T., Ghosheh Y., Dinh H.Q., Ley K. Meta-analysis of leukocyte diversity in atherosclerotic mouse aortas. Circ. Res. 2020;127(3):402–426. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Depuydt M.A.C., Prange K.H.M., Slenders L., Örd T., Elbersen D., Boltjes A., de Jager S.C.A., Asselbergs F.W., de Borst G.J., Aavik E., Lönnberg T., Lutgens E., Glass C.K., den Ruijter H.M., Kaikkonen M.U., Bot I., Slütter B., van der Laan S.W., Yla-Herttuala S.…Pasterkamp G. Microanatomy of the human atherosclerotic plaque by single-cell transcriptomics. Circ. Res. 2020;127(11):1437–1455. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Martín-Fuentes P., Civeira F., Recalde D., García-Otín A.L., Jarauta E., Marzo I., Cenarro A. Individual variation of scavenger receptor expression in human macrophages with oxidized low-density lipoprotein is associated with a differential inflammatory response. J. Immunol. 2007;179(5):3242–3248. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jinnouchi H., Guo L., Sakamoto A., Torii S., Sato Y., Cornelissen A., Kuntz S., Paek K.H., Fernandez R., Fuller D., Gadhoke N., Surve D., Romero M., Kolodgie F.D., Virmani R., Finn A.V. Diversity of macrophage phenotypes and responses in atherosclerosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020;77(10):1919–1932. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03371-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moore K.J., Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145(3):341–355. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tabas I., Bornfeldt K.E. Macrophage phenotype and function in different stages of atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2016;118(4):653–667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gautier E.L., Huby T., Witztum J.L., Ouzilleau B., Miller E.R., Saint-Charles F., Aucouturier P., Chapman M.J., Lesnik P. Macrophage apoptosis exerts divergent effects on atherogenesis as a function of lesion stage. Circulation. 2009;119(13):1795–1804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.806158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Frostegård J., Ulfgren A.K., Nyberg P., Hedin U., Swedenborg J., Andersson U., Hansson G.K. Cytokine expression in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques: dominance of pro-inflammatory (Th1) and macrophage-stimulating cytokines. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145(1):33–43. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chinetti-Gbaguidi G., Baron M., Bouhlel M.A., Vanhoutte J., Copin C., Sebti Y., Derudas B., Mayi T., Bories G., Tailleux A., Haulon S., Zawadzki C., Jude B., Staels B. Human atherosclerotic plaque alternative macrophages display low cholesterol handling but high phagocytosis because of distinct activities of the PPARɣ and LXRα pathways. Circ. Res. 2011;108(8):985–995. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stewart C.R., Stuart L.M., Wilkinson K., van Gils J.M., Deng J., Halle A., Rayner K.J., Boyer L., Zhong R., Frazier W.A., Lacy-Hulbert A., El Khoury J., Golenbock D.T., Moore K.J. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a Toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11(2):155–161. doi: 10.1038/ni.1836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mackaness G.B. Cellular resistance to infection. J. Exp. Med. 1962;116:381–406. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moore Kathryn J., Sheedy Frederick J., Fisher Edward A. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013;13(10):709–721. doi: 10.1038/nri3520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Orecchioni Marco, Ghosheh Yanal, Pramod Akula Bala, Ley Klaus. Macrophage polarization: different gene signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS–) vs. Alternatively activated macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1084. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jerrold M. Olefsky, Glass Christopher K. Macrophages, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2010;72(1):219–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bosco M.C. Macrophage polarization: reaching across the aisle? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019;143(4):1348–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.12.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stöger J.L., Gijbels M.J.J., Velden S. van der, Manca M., Loos C. M. van der, Biessen E.A.L., Daemen M.J.A.P., Lutgens E., Winther M. P. J. de. Distribution of macrophage polarization markers in human atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;225(2):461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Park Y.M., Febbraio M., Silverstein R.L. CD36 modulates migration of mouse and human macrophages in response to oxidized LDL and may contribute to macrophage trapping in the arterial intima. J. Clin. Invest. 2008;JCI35535 doi: 10.1172/JCI35535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Febbraio M., Hajjar D.P., Silverstein R.L. CD36: A class B scavenger receptor involved in angiogenesis, atherosclerosis, inflammation, and lipid metabolism. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;108(6):785–791. doi: 10.1172/JCI14006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Xiuling, Chen Shanshan, He Jinrong, Chen W., Ding Y., Huang J., Huang J. Histone methyltransferases G9a mediated lipid-induced M1 macrophage polarization through negatively regulating CD36. Metabolism. 2021;114 doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McNelis Joanne C., Olefsky Jerrold M. Macrophages, immunity, and metabolic disease. Immunity. 2014;41(1):36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shapouri‐Moghaddam A., Saeed Mohammadian, Hossein Vazini, Taghadosi M., Esmaeili S., Mardani F., Seifi B., Mohammadi A., Afshari J.T., Sahebkar A. Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018;233(9):6425–6440. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dylan G. Ryan, O'Neill Luke A.J. Krebs cycle reborn in macrophage immunometabolism. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2020;38(1):289–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-081619-104850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang F., Zhang S., Jeon R., Vuckovic I., Jiang X., Lerman A., Folmes C.D., Dzeja P.D., Herrmann J. Interferon gamma induces reversible metabolic reprogramming of M1 macrophages to sustain cell viability and pro-inflammatory activity. EBioMedicine. 2018;30:303–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Everts B., Amiel E., van der Windt G.J., Freitas T.C., Chott R., Yarasheski K.E., Pearce E.L., Pearce E.J. Commitment to glycolysis sustains survival of NO-producing inflammatory dendritic cells. Blood. 2012;120(7):1422–1431. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-419747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saha S., Shalova I.N., Biswas S.K. Metabolic regulation of macrophage phenotype and function. Immunol. Rev. 2017;280(1):102–111. doi: 10.1111/imr.12603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tannahill G.M., Curtis A.M., Adamik J., Palsson-McDermott E.M., McGettrick A.F., Goel G., Frezza C., Bernard N.J., Kelly B., Foley N.H., Zheng L., Gardet A., Tong Z., Jany S.S., Corr S.C., Haneklaus M., Caffrey B.E., Pierce K., Walmsley S.…O'Neill L.a.J. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature. 2013;496(7444):238–242. doi: 10.1038/nature11986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.M K., M H., G S. More than just protein building blocks: how amino acids and related metabolic pathways fuel macrophage polarization. FEBS J. 2021;288(12) doi: 10.1111/febs.15715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.JhaStanley Ching-Cheng Huang Abhishek K., Alexey Sergushichev, Lampropoulou V., Ivanova Y., Loginicheva E., Chmielewski K., Stewart K.M., Ashall J., Everts B., Pearce E.J., Driggers E.M., Artyomov M.N. Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization. Immunity. 2015;42(3):419–430. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Luke A. J. O'Neill. A broken krebs cycle in macrophages. Immunity. 2015;42(3):393–394. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Evanna L. Mills, Beth Kelly, Angela Logan, Costa A.S.H., Varma M., Bryant C.E., Tourlomousis P., Däbritz J.H.M., Gottlieb E., Latorre I., Corr S.C., McManus G., Ryan D., Jacobs H.T., Szibor M., Xavier R.J., Braun T., Frezza C., Murphy M.P., O'Neill L.A. Succinate dehydrogenase supports metabolic repurposing of mitochondria to drive inflammatory macrophages. Cell. 2016;167(2):457–470.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kelly B., O'Neill L.A. Metabolic reprogramming in macrophages and dendritic cells in innate immunity. Cell Res. 2015;25(7):771–784. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Groh L., Keating S.T., Joosten L.A.B., Netea M.G., Riksen N.P. Monocyte and macrophage immunometabolism in atherosclerosis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018;40(2):203–214. doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0656-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Günthner Roman, Anders Hans-Joachim. Interferon-regulatory factors determine macrophage phenotype polarization. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/731023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xie Changli, Liu Cuiying, Wu Bitao, Lin Yan, Ma T., Xiong H., Wang Q., Li Z., Ma C., Tu Z. Effects of IRF1 and IFN-β interaction on the M1 polarization of macrophages and its antitumor function. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;38(1):148–160. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Peter Duewell, Hajime Kono, Katey J. Rayner, Sirois C.M., Vladimer G., Bauernfeind F.G., Abela G.S., Franchi L., Nuñez G., Schnurr M., Espevik T., Lien E., Fitzgerald K.A., Rock K.L., Moore K.J., Wright S.D., Hornung V., Latz E. NLRP3 inflammasomes are required for atherogenesis and activated by cholesterol crystals. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1357–1361. doi: 10.1038/nature08938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Verreck F.A.W., de Boer T., Langenberg D.M.L., Hoeve M.A., Kramer M., Vaisberg E., Kastelein R., Kolk A., de Waal-Malefyt R., Ottenhoff T.H.M. Human IL-23-producing type 1 macrophages promote but IL-10-producing type 2 macrophages subvert immunity to (myco)bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101(13):4560–4565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400983101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cardoso L., Weinbaum S. Molecular, Cellular, and Tissue Engineering of the Vascular System 1097(129–155) Springer International Publishing; 2018. Microcalcifications, their genesis, growth, and biomechanical stability in fibrous cap rupture. B. M. Fu & N. T. Wright. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sun J., Singh P., Shami A., Kluza E., Pan M., Djordjevic D., Michaelsen N.B., Kennbäck C., van der Wel N.N., Orho-Melander M., Nilsson J., Formentini I., Conde-Knape K., Lutgens E., Edsfeldt A., Gonçalves I. Spatial transcriptional mapping reveals site-specific pathways underlying human atherosclerotic plaque rupture. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023;81(23):2213–2227. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jl G., Ms B. A century of cholesterol and coronaries: from plaques to genes to statins. Cell. 2015;161(1) doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Laurent Yvan-Charvet, Tamara Pagler, Emmanuel L. Gautier, Avagyan S., Siry R.L., Han S., Welch C.L., Wang N., Randolph G.J., Snoeck H.W., Tall A.R. ATP-binding cassette transporters and HDL suppress hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Science. 2010;328(5986):1689–1693. doi: 10.1126/science.1189731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim K.-W., Ivanov S., Williams J.W. Monocyte recruitment, specification, and function in atherosclerosis. Cells. 2020;10(1):15. doi: 10.3390/cells10010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hutchins P.M., Heinecke J.W. Cholesterol efflux capacity, macrophage reverse cholesterol transport and cardioprotective HDL. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2015;26(5):388–393. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Williams J.W., Zaitsev K., Kim K.-W., Ivanov S., Saunders B.T., Schrank P.R., Kim K., Elvington A., Kim S.H., Tucker C.G., Wohltmann M., Fife B.T., Epelman S., Artyomov M.N., Lavine K.J., Zinselmeyer B.H., Choi J.-H., Randolph G.J. Limited proliferation capacity of aortic intima resident macrophages requires monocyte recruitment for atherosclerotic plaque progression. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21(10):1194–1204. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0768-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pentikäinen M.O., Oörni K., Ala-Korpela M., Kovanen P.T. Modified LDL - trigger of atherosclerosis and inflammation in the arterial intima. J. Intern. Med. 2000;247(3):359–370. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chistiakov D.A., Melnichenko A.A., Myasoedova V.A., Grechko A.V., Orekhov A.N. Mechanisms of foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. J. Mol. Med. 2017;95(11):1153–1165. doi: 10.1007/s00109-017-1575-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.van Nieuw Amerongen G.P., Vermeer M.A., Nègre-Aminou P., Lankelma J., Emeis J.J., van Hinsbergh V.W. Simvastatin improves disturbed endothelial barrier function. Circulation. 2000;102(23):2803–2809. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.23.2803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.A K., C C., Ad V. Cytoskeletal mechanisms regulating vascular endothelial barrier function in response to acute lung injury. Tissue Barriers. 2015;3(1–2) doi: 10.4161/21688370.2014.974448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang X.-F., Yang Y., Lian Y.-T., Wang Z.-H., Li X.-W., Cheng L.-X., Liu J.-P., Wang Y.-F., Gao X., Liao Y.-H., Wang M., Zeng Q.-T., Liu K. The antibody targeting the E314 peptide of human Kv1.3 pore region serves as a novel, potent and specific channel blocker. PLoS One. 2012;7(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang B., Tang X., Yao L., Wang Y., Chen Z., Li M., Wu N., Wu D., Dai X., Jiang H., Ai D. Disruption of USP9X in macrophages promotes foam cell formation and atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132(10) doi: 10.1172/JCI154217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yongting Luo, Duan Hongxia, Qian Yining, Feng L., Wu Z., Wang F., Feng J., Yang D., Qin Z., Yan X. Macrophagic CD146 promotes foam cell formation and retention during atherosclerosis. Cell Res. 2017;27(3):352–372. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Guo X., Li B., Wen C., Zhang F., Xiang X., Nie L., Chen J., Mao L. TREM2 promotes cholesterol uptake and foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.: CMLS. 2023;80(5):137. doi: 10.1007/s00018-023-04786-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liu X., Guo J.-W., Lin X.-C., Tuo Y.-H., Peng W.-L., He S.-Y., Li Z.-Q., Ye Y.-C., Yu J., Zhang F.-R., Ma M.-M., Shang J.-Y., Lv X.-F., Zhou A.-D., Ouyang Y., Wang C., Pang R.-P., Sun J.-X., Ou J.-S.…Liang S.-J. Macrophage NFATc3 prevents foam cell formation and atherosclerosis: evidence and mechanisms. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42(47):4847–4861. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.van Dierendonck X.A.M.H., Vrieling F., Smeehuijzen L., Deng L., Boogaard J.P., Croes C.-A., Temmerman L., Wetzels S., Biessen E., Kersten S., Stienstra R. Triglyceride breakdown from lipid droplets regulates the inflammatory response in macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119(12) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114739119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yurdagul A., Doran A.C., Cai B., Fredman G., Tabas I.A. Mechanisms and consequences of defective efferocytosis in atherosclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2018;4:86. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2017.00086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Badimon L., Vilahur G. Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture. J. Intern. Med. 2014;276(6):618–632. doi: 10.1111/joim.12296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Newman A.A.C., Serbulea V., Baylis R.A., Shankman L.S., Bradley X., Alencar G.F., Owsiany K., Deaton R.A., Karnewar S., Shamsuzzaman S., Salamon A., Reddy M.S., Guo L., Finn A., Virmani R., Cherepanova O.A., Owens G.K. Multiple cell types contribute to the atherosclerotic lesion fibrous cap by PDGFRβ and bioenergetic mechanisms. Nat. Metab. 2021;3(2):166–181. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-00338-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cai B., Thorp E.B., Doran A.C., Sansbury B.E., Daemen M.J.A.P., Dorweiler B., Spite M., Fredman G., Tabas I. MerTK receptor cleavage promotes plaque necrosis and defective resolution in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127(2):564–568. doi: 10.1172/JCI90520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Doran A.C., Ozcan L., Cai B., Zheng Z., Fredman G., Rymond C.C., Dorweiler B., Sluimer J.C., Hsieh J., Kuriakose G., Tall A.R., Tabas I. CAMKIIγ suppresses an efferocytosis pathway in macrophages and promotes atherosclerotic plaque necrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127(11):4075–4089. doi: 10.1172/JCI94735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kojima Y., Downing K., Kundu R., Miller C., Dewey F., Lancero H., Raaz U., Perisic L., Hedin U., Schadt E., Maegdefessel L., Quertermous T., Leeper N.J. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B regulates efferocytosis and atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2014;124(3):1083–1097. doi: 10.1172/JCI70391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Flores A.M., Hosseini-Nassab N., Jarr K.-U., Ye J., Zhu X., Wirka R., Koh A.L., Tsantilas P., Wang Y., Nanda V., Kojima Y., Zeng Y., Lotfi M., Sinclair R., Weissman I.L., Ingelsson E., Smith B.R., Leeper N.J. Pro-efferocytic nanoparticles are specifically taken up by lesional macrophages and prevent atherosclerosis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020;15(2):154–161. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0619-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Potteaux S., Gautier E.L., Hutchison S.B., van Rooijen N., Rader D.J., Thomas M.J., Sorci-Thomas M.G., Randolph G.J. Suppressed monocyte recruitment drives macrophage removal from atherosclerotic plaques of Apoe-/- mice during disease regression. J. Clin. Investig. 2011;121(5):2025–2036. doi: 10.1172/JCI43802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tacke F., Randolph G.J. Migratory fate and differentiation of blood monocyte subsets. Immunobiology. 2006;211(6–8):609–618. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Vanessa Byles, Anthony J. Covarrubias, Ben-Sahra Issam, Lamming D.W., Sabatini D.M., Manning B.D., Horng T. The TSC-mTOR pathway regulates macrophage polarization. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2834. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Eshghjoo S., Kim D.M., Jayaraman A., Sun Y., Alaniz R.C. Macrophage polarization in atherosclerosis. Genes. 2022;13(5):756. doi: 10.3390/genes13050756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rahman K., Vengrenyuk Y., Ramsey S.A., Vila N.R., Girgis N.M., Liu J., Gusarova V., Gromada J., Weinstock A., Moore K.J., Loke P., Fisher E.A. Inflammatory Ly6Chi monocytes and their conversion to M2 macrophages drive atherosclerosis regression. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127(8):2904–2915. doi: 10.1172/JCI75005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Koelwyn G.J., Corr E.M., Erbay E., Moore K.J. Regulation of macrophage immunometabolism in atherosclerosis. Nat. Immunol. 2018;19(6):526–537. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0113-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Libby P., Buring J.E., Badimon L., Hansson G.K., Deanfield J., Bittencourt M.S., Tokgözoğlu L., Lewis E.F. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019;5(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Punch E., Klein J., Diaba-Nuhoho P., Morawietz H., Garelnabi M. Effects of PCSK9 targeting: alleviating oxidation, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb;11(3) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ding Z., Pothineni N.V.K., Goel A., Lüscher T.F., Mehta J.L. PCSK9 and inflammation: role of shear stress, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and LOX-1. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;116(5):908–915. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kong P., Cui Z.-Y., Huang X.-F., Zhang D.-D., Guo R.-J., Han M. Inflammation and atherosclerosis: signaling pathways and therapeutic intervention. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2022;7(1):131. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00955-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Surma S., Sahebkar A., Banach M. Whether and why do we need a vaccine against atherosclerosis? Can we expect it anytime soon? Curr. Atherosclerosis Rep. 2024 doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01186-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sabatine M.S., Giugliano R.P., Keech A.C., Honarpour N., Wiviott S.D., Murphy S.A., Kuder J.F., Wang H., Liu T., Wasserman S.M., Sever P.S., Pedersen T.R. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376(18):1713–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Xue J., Schmidt S.V., Sander J., Draffehn A., Krebs W., Quester I., De Nardo D., Gohel T.D., Emde M., Schmidleithner L., Ganesan H., Nino-Castro A., Mallmann M.R., Labzin L., Theis H., Kraut M., Beyer M., Latz E., Freeman T.C.…Schultze J.L. Transcriptome-based network analysis reveals a spectrum model of human macrophage activation. Immunity. 2014;40(2):274–288. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.De Nardo D., Labzin L.I., Kono H., Seki R., Schmidt S.V., Beyer M., Xu D., Zimmer S., Lahrmann C., Schildberg F.A., Vogelhuber J., Kraut M., Ulas T., Kerksiek A., Krebs W., Bode N., Grebe A., Fitzgerald M.L., Hernandez N.J.…Latz E. High-density lipoprotein mediates anti-inflammatory reprogramming of macrophages via the transcriptional regulator ATF3. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15(2):152–160. doi: 10.1038/ni.2784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Li Z., Martin M., Zhang J., Huang H.-Y., Bai L., Zhang J., Kang J., He M., Li J., Maurya M.R., Gupta S., Zhou G., Sangwung P., Xu Y.-J., Lei T., Huang H.-D., Jain M., Jain M.K., Subramaniam S., Shyy J.Y.-J. Krüppel-like factor 4 regulation of cholesterol-25-hydroxylase and liver X receptor mitigates atherosclerosis susceptibility. Circulation. 2017;136(14):1315–1330. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hoeksema M.A., Gijbels M.J., Van den Bossche J., van der Velden S., Sijm A., Neele A.E., Seijkens T., Stöger J.L., Meiler S., Boshuizen M.C., Dallinga-Thie G.M., Levels J.H., Boon L., Mullican S.E., Spann N.J., Cleutjens J.P., Glass C.K., Lazar M.A., de Vries C.J.…de Winther M.P. Targeting macrophage Histone deacetylase 3 stabilizes atherosclerotic lesions. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014;6(9):1124–1132. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cao Q., Rong S., Repa J.J., St Clair R., Parks J.S., Mishra N. Histone deacetylase 9 represses cholesterol efflux and alternatively activated macrophages in atherosclerosis development. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014;34(9):1871–1879. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Neele A.E., Prange K.H., Hoeksema M.A., van der Velden S., Lucas T., Dimmeler S., Lutgens E., Van den Bossche J., de Winther M.P. Macrophage Kdm6b controls the pro-fibrotic transcriptome signature of foam cells. Epigenomics. 2017;9(4):383–391. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kuznetsova T., Prange K.H.M., Glass C.K., de Winther M.P.J. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of macrophages in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17(4):216–228. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0265-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lightbody R.J., Taylor J.M.W., Dempsie Y., Graham A. Induction of microRNA hsa-let-7d-5p, and repression of HMGA2, contribute protection against lipid accumulation in macrophage ‘foam’ cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2021;1866(11) doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.159005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bäck M., Yurdagul A., Tabas I., Öörni K., Kovanen P.T. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019;16(7):389–406. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0169-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Serhan C.N. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature. 2014;510(7503):92–101. doi: 10.1038/nature13479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lopategi A., Flores-Costa R., Rius B., López-Vicario C., Alcaraz-Quiles J., Titos E., Clària J. Frontline Science: specialized proresolving lipid mediators inhibit the priming and activation of the macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019;105(1):25–36. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3HI0517-206RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kasikara C., Doran A.C., Cai B., Tabas I. The role of non-resolving inflammation in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2018;128(7):2713–2723. doi: 10.1172/JCI97950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Salazar J., Pirela D., Nava M., Castro A., Angarita L., Parra H., Durán-Agüero S., Rojas-Gómez D.M., Galbán N., Añez R., Chacín M., Diaz A., Villasmil N., De Sanctis J.B., Bermúdez V. Specialized proresolving lipid mediators: a potential therapeutic target for atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(6):3133. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chiang N., Libreros S., Norris P.C., de la Rosa X., Serhan C.N. Maresin 1 activates LGR6 receptor promoting phagocyte immunoresolvent functions. J. Clin. Investig. 2019;129(12):5294–5311. doi: 10.1172/JCI129448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bäck M., Yurdagul A., Tabas I., Öörni K., Kovanen P.T. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0169-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ridker P.M., Everett B.M., Thuren T., MacFadyen J.G., Chang W.H., Ballantyne C., Fonseca F., Nicolau J., Koenig W., Anker S.D., Kastelein J.J.P., Cornel J.H., Pais P., Pella D., Genest J., Cifkova R., Lorenzatti A., Forster T., Kobalava Z.…CANTOS Trial Group Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377(12):1119–1131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chen W., Schilperoort M., Cao Y., Shi J., Tabas I., Tao W. Macrophage-targeted nanomedicine for the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022;19(4):228–249. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00629-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Majmudar M.D., Keliher E.J., Heidt T., Leuschner F., Truelove J., Sena B.F., Gorbatov R., Iwamoto Y., Dutta P., Wojtkiewicz G., Courties G., Sebas M., Borodovsky A., Fitzgerald K., Nolte M.W., Dickneite G., Chen J.W., Anderson D.G., Swirski F.K.…Nahrendorf M. Monocyte-directed RNAi targeting CCR2 improves infarct healing in atherosclerosis-prone mice. Circulation. 2013;127(20):2038–2046. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Leuschner F., Dutta P., Gorbatov R., Novobrantseva T.I., Donahoe J.S., Courties G., Lee K.M., Kim J.I., Markmann J.F., Marinelli B., Panizzi P., Lee W.W., Iwamoto Y., Milstein S., Epstein-Barash H., Cantley W., Wong J., Cortez-Retamozo V., Newton A.…Nahrendorf M. Therapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory monocytes in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29(11):1005–1010. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lameijer M., Binderup T., Van Leent M.M.T., Senders M.L., Fay F., Malkus J., Sanchez-Gaytan B.L., Teunissen A.J.P., Karakatsanis N., Robson P., Zhou X., Ye Y., Wojtkiewicz G., Tang J., Seijkens T.T.P., Kroon J., Stroes E.S.G., Kjaer A., Ochando J.…Duivenvoorden R. Efficacy and safety assessment of a TRAF6-targeted nanoimmunotherapy in atherosclerotic mice and non-human primates. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2018;2(5):279–292. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0221-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Seijkens T.T.P., Van Tiel C.M., Kusters P.J.H., Atzler D., Soehnlein O., Zarzycka B., Aarts S.A.B.M., Lameijer M., Gijbels M.J., Beckers L., Den Toom M., Slütter B., Kuiper J., Duchene J., Aslani M., Megens R.T.A., Van T., Veer C., Kooij G., Schrijver R.…Lutgens E. Targeting CD40-induced TRAF6 signaling in macrophages reduces atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018;71(5):527–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wang Y., Zhang K., Qin X., Li T., Qiu J., Yin T., Huang J., McGinty S., Pontrelli G., Ren J., Wang Q., Wu W., Wang G. Biomimetic nanotherapies: red blood cell based core–shell structured nanocomplexes for atherosclerosis management. Adv. Sci. 2019;6(12) doi: 10.1002/advs.201900172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ma Q., Fan Q., Han X., Dong Z., Xu J., Bai J., Tao W., Sun D., Wang C. Platelet-derived extracellular vesicles to target plaque inflammation for effective anti-atherosclerotic therapy. J. Contr. Release: Off. J. Controlled Release Soc. 2021;329:445–453. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Fredman G., Kamaly N., Spolitu S., Milton J., Ghorpade D., Chiasson R., Kuriakose G., Perretti M., Farokhzad O., Tabas I. Targeted nanoparticles containing the proresolving peptide Ac2-26 protect against advanced atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7(275) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Virani S.S., Alonso A., Aparicio H.J., Benjamin E.J., Bittencourt M.S., Callaway C.W., Carson A.P., Chamberlain A.M., Cheng S., Delling F.N., Elkind M.S.V., Evenson K.R., Ferguson J.F., Gupta D.K., Khan S.S., Kissela B.M., Knutson K.L., Lee C.D., Lewis T.T. American heart association council on epidemiology and prevention statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the Am. Heart Assoc. Circulation. 2021;143(8):e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Question: Has data associated with your study been deposited into a publicly available repository?
Response: NO.
Question: Has data associated with your study been deposited into a publicly available repository?
Response: No data was used for the research described in the article.



