Table 5.
Difference in treatment rates used to transform intention‐to‐treat estimates.
| Study (Outcome) | Treatment rate among treated | Treatment rate among control | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohodes et al. (2022) | |||
| Six‐week arm | 87% | 0% | Table A.2: |
| One‐week arm | 85% | 0% | Table A.2: |
| Online arm | 77% | 0% | Table A.2: |
| Gehring et al. (2018) and Henson (2018) – progression to higher education | 84% | 0% | Average across other studies evaluating the outcome |
| Gorard et al. (2014) | 79% | 0% | Page 18 |
| Herrera et al. (2013)/Garcia et al. (2020) (4 years only) | |||
| 1st spring post‐programme | 75% | 0% | Page 8 |
| 2nd spring post‐programme | 70% | 0% | Page 8 |
| 4th spring post‐programme | 47% | 0% | Page 8 |
| Johnson (2020) | 34% | 0% | Page 1764 |
| Leos‐Urbel (2014) | 73% | 0% | Page 896 |
| Lynch and Kim (2017) | 60% | 0% | Page 44 |
| Modestino and Paulsen (2019a)/Modestino (2019b) | 84% | 0% | Page 10 |
| Somers et al. (2015) | 92% | 0% | Page 22 |
| Torgerson et al. (2014) | 63% | 0% | Page 13 |
| Valentine et al. (2017) | 67% | 6% | Page 41 |
| Wathington et al. (2016) | 87% | 0% | Table 3 |
Source: IES (2024).