Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul 6;7(10):1667–1681. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01640-7

Table 2:

Descriptive statistics of the self-report symptom measures between attentive and C/IE participants. Skew: the empirical skewness of the distribution of total symptom scores. Total score: the average symptom score across attentive and C/IE participants. Scores were compared using a two-sample t-test (df = 384, α = 0.05, two-tailed, not corrected for multiple comparisons). Cronbach’s α: a measure of response consistency, where values closer to 1 indicate greater consistency in responses. % Clinical Cutoff: the percentage of participants reaching threshold for clinical symptomology before and after screening based on the infrequency measure. The BIS/BAS scales do not have clinical thresholds.

Total Score Cronbach’s α % Clinical Cutoff
Subscale Skew Attentive C/IE t-value p-value Attentive C/IE Before After
7-up 0.806 3.9 10.2 −13.312 <0.001 0.84 0.84 13.0% 4.0%
7-down 0.759 4.8 10.7 −9.987 <0.001 0.94 0.88 17.4% 9.3%
GAD-7 0.753 4.9 9.7 −7.881 <0.001 0.92 0.87 25.9% 17.3%
BIS 0.780 7.7 7.9 −0.542 0.612 0.83 0.62 - -
BAS 0.171 15.7 16.2 −0.912 0.357 0.84 0.71 - -
SHAPS 0.256 8.0 10.8 −4.043 <0.001 0.90 0.81 17.9% 14.6%
PSWQ 0.193 4.8 6.7 −4.784 <0.001 0.93 0.81 7.3% 7.0%