Skip to main content
. 2024 May 31;14(11):1657. doi: 10.3390/ani14111657

Table 4.

Effects of different levels of COS on rumen fermentation parameters of beef cattle.

Items Dietary COS Level, Feeding Basis SEM p-Value
CON 0.02%
COS
0.04%
COS
0.08%
COS
Main Effect Linear Quadratic
pH 6.42 c 6.43 c 6.46 b 6.49 a 0.007 <0.01 0.858 <0.01
NH3-N (mg/dL) 7.98 a 7.93 a 7.69 b 7.35 c 0.090 <0.01 0.739 <0.01
MCP (mg/mL) 0.59 b 0.59 b 0.61 ab 0.62 a 0.010 0.104 0.733 <0.01
Total VFA (mmol/mL) 112.53 113.09 113.83 113.43 1.249 0.104 0.591 0.557
Acetate (mmol/mL) 68.95 a 68.15 ab 67.37 ab 66.70 b 0.897 <0.01 0.584 0.07
Propionate (mmol/mL) 25.83 b 27.13 a 27.66 a 27.66 a 0.524 <0.01 0.059 <0.01
Isobutyrate (mmol/mL) 0.72 a 0.69 b 0.66 c 0.65 c 0.008 <0.01 0.272 <0.01
Butyrate (mmol/mL) 13.74 b 13.76 b 14.91 a 15.23 a 0.287 0.635 0.880 <0.01
Isovalerate (mmol/mL) 1.48 1.51 1.47 1.48 0.036 <0.01 0.410 0.467
Valerate (mmol/mL) 1.82 a 1.85 a 1.76 b 1.71 b 0.027 0.76 0.334 <0.01
Acetate/propionate 2.67 a 2.51 b 2.43 b 2.42 b 0.044 <0.01 0.042 <0.01

In the table, the superscript “a–c” represents the differences in data between the treatment groups. Different letters indicate differences between the groups (p < 0.05), while the same or no letters indicate no significant differences (p > 0.05); SEM, standard error of the mean. pH, potential of hydrogen; MCP, microbial protein.