Abstract
Fusarium pseudograminearum causes destructive crown disease in wheat. The velvet protein family is a crucial regulator in development, virulence, and secondary metabolism of fungi. We conducted a functional analysis of FpVelB using a gene replacement strategy. The deletion of FpVelB decreased radial growth and enhanced conidial production compared to that of wild type. Furthermore, FpVelB modulates the fungal responses to abiotic stress through diverse mechanisms. Significantly, virulence decreased after the deletion of FpVelB in both the stem base and head of wheat. Genome-wide gene expression profiling revealed that the regulation of genes by FpVelB is associated with several processes related to the aforementioned phenotype, including “immune”, “membrane”, and “antioxidant activity”, particularly with regard to secondary metabolites. Most importantly, we demonstrated that FpVelB regulates pathogen virulence by influencing deoxynivalenol production and modulating the expression of the PKS11 gene. In conclusion, FpVelB is crucial for plant growth, asexual development, and abiotic stress response and is essential for full virulence via secondary metabolism in F. pseudograminearum.
Keywords: Triticum aestivum, Fusarium pseudograminearum, velvet, conidiation, secondary metabolite
1. Introduction
Fusarium crown rot (FCR), primarily caused by the soil-borne fungal pathogen Fusarium pseudograminearum, is a widespread and destructive disease that affects cereal crops, particularly wheat and barley [1]. This chronic soil-borne disease is notorious for its ability to inflict substantial yield losses and economic damage. Losses in yield due to this disease are as high as 10–35% under natural inoculum levels in Australia and the Pacific Northwest of the USA [2]. The prevalence of F. pseudograminearum has increased sharply in the Henan, Hebei, and Shandong provinces, which are the main wheat-producing areas in the Huang–Huai region of China [3,4,5]. Typical symptoms of FCR include crown, foot, and root rot. After infection, the coleopedia, bottom leaf sheath, and base stem of wheat show successive browning. Heavily infected plants produce white heads with no or few full seeds [6]. In addition to production loss, the pathogen can threaten human and animal health by contaminating food with the producing mycotoxins, such as deoxynivalenol (DON) and nivalenol (NIV) [7].
Plant pathogens can produce cell wall-degrading enzymes, secondary metabolites (SMs), and other pathogenic substances that participate in pathogenic diseases. F. pseudograminearum successfully infects and colonizes host tissues by producing certain SMs, such as the trichothecene toxin DON because the deletion mutants of the TRI5 gene exhibit reduced virulence in wheat [8,9,10]. In addition, a gene cluster encoding a cytokinin-like metabolite has been identified in F. pseudograminearum. Fusarium cytokinins have been shown to activate cytokinin signaling in plants both in vitro and in vivo to help pathogens infect host plants [11]. In a recent study, the deletion of the nonribosomal peptide-coding gene FpNPS9 compromised DON production and virulence in F. pseudograminearum. Further analysis revealed at least 16 nonribosomal peptide synthetases and 14 polyketide synthases (PKSs) in the genome of F. pseudograminearum. These synthases play important roles in the secondary metabolic synthesis pathway [12]. Therefore, other SMs likely affect the pathogenicity of F. pseudograminearum [8,13]. In view of the important role of SMs in F. pseudograminearum infection, the study of these regulatory mechanisms of SMs may help the understanding of virulence mechanisms and provide an important reference for resistance breeding and disease control [7]. The regulatory mechanisms of SMs in fungi involve multiple processes such as signal transduction pathways and environmental factors. These regulatory factors can be divided into global regulators, pathway-specific modifications, and epigenetic modifications [14]. Among these, the light response-related velvet family proteins are important global regulators of SMs in fungi [15].
The velvet protein family comprises a class of fungal transcription factors sharing a common velvet domain. The four members—VeA, VelB, VelC, and VosA—have been well identified and characterized [16]. Among these, VeA was the most intensively studied protein that regulates development and SMs in a variety of fungi [15]. VelB, which can assemble into a heterotrimeric velvet complex with VeA, is involved in multiple regulatory processes in several filamentous fungi [17]. This complex plays an important role in conidiation and virulence by regulating the transcription factor VmCmr1, which is involved in melanin synthesis and in controlling the expression of pectinase genes in Valsa mali [18]. In addition, the lack of VelB hinders both conidiation and aflatoxin production in Aspergillus flavus [19]. VelB is crucial for the development, pathogenicity, and SM of Penicillium expansum [20]. VelB can also form a complex with VosA. This complex affects the growth, development, and SMs of A. nidulans in different ways and to different degrees [21,22,23]. The velvet complexes are present in the Fusarium genus. The VelB subunits within these complexes interact to control the biosynthesis of deoxynivalenol, fumonisin, and beauvericin in addition to governing aspects of the development, pathogenicity, and virulence of F. graminearum, F. verticillioides, and F. oxysporum [24,25,26]. In F. pseudograminearum, FpVeA, a key member of the velvet family, was identified via map-based cloning and regulates the virulence of F. pseudograminearum [27]. However, the function and regulatory mechanism of VelB remain poorly understood when SMs, key virulence factors, are regulated by VelB, as is the manner in which this regulation may occur.
In this study, we investigated the function of VelB orthologous protein, FpVelB, in the development, virulence, and expression of SM genes of F. pseudograminearum. The deletion of FpVelB led to notable differences in growth and conidiation. Furthermore, we observed reduced virulence in the FpVelB deletion mutants. FpVelB has also been identified as a key regulator of multiple metabolic pathway genes, particularly those associated with SMs. Notably, DON production depends on FpVelB. Additionally, FpVelB positively regulates another SM gene cluster associated with pathogenesis. These findings strongly suggest that FpVelB is crucial for growth, asexual development, and abiotic stress responses and is essential for full virulence via SMs in F. pseudograminearum.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Strains and Culture Conditions
Wild-type strains of Fusarium pseudograminearum 2035 were stored in the Laboratory of Fungi Diseases, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences. All F. pseudograminearum strains were incubated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (potato extract 200 g, dextrose 20 g, and agar 15 g per litre) at 25 °C.
The growth rates of F. pseudograminearum strains were calculated using the colony radius per day. Conidiation assays were performed using carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CMC) medium [28]. The conidial concentration of the various strains was assessed using a hemocytometer following incubation in 100 mL CMC at 170 rpm and 25 °C for 4 d [29]. Complete medium (CM) supplemented with different inhibitors was used to assess the stress responses of the various strains. The vital medium consisted of yeast extract (6 g/L), peptone (2 g/L), casein hydrolysate (6 g/L), sucrose (10 g/L), NaNO3 (12 g/L), KCl (1 g/L), KH2PO4 (3 g/L), and agar (15 g/L). The inhibitors were supplemented with NaCl (0.7 M), 3 mM H2O2 (3 mM), Congo red (200 mg/L), or sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 0.01%). TB3 medium, composed of yeast extract (3 g/L), casamino acids (3 g/L), sucrose (200 g/L), and agar (15 g/L), was used for the recovery and selection of resistant transformants for gene deletion or complementation procedures. Hygromycin B (250 μg/mL, Calbiochem, LaJolla, CA, USA) and geneticin (250 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were selected as screening markers for gene deletion or complementation, respectively.
2.2. Gene Deletion and Complementation
The FpVelB gene was initially examined by conducting homology searches for the genomic sequences of F. pseudograminearum (GenBank accession NC_031951.1) using the VelB protein of A. nidulans as a reference [17]. Alignment of FpVelB with homologous proteins was performed using ClustalW. Subsequently, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method included in MEGA software version 7.02 [30]. Gene deletion constructs were created by substituting the full open reading frame (ORF) of target genes. The upstream and downstream flanking sequences of the target genes were amplified from the genomic DNA of wild-type strain 2035 using 1F/2R and 3F/4R primer pairs, respectively. Primer sets HYG/F and HYG/R were used to amplify fragments containing the partial hygromycin phosphotransferase gene. The three fragments were assembled using a double-joint overlapping PCR method [31]. The fusion replacement fragment was introduced into 2035 strain protoplasts and mediated using polyethylene glycol method. Protoplasts were prepared and transformed according to established procedures [32]. After screening with hygromycin B medium, hygromycin-resistant transformants underwent PCR screening with the primer pairs 5F/6R, H850F/H852R, 7F/H856R, and H855F/8R to validate the gene replacement events. Putative gene deletion mutants were validated through Southern blot analysis using an hph gene probe (designated as probe h). The procedure followed the manufacturer’s instructions (DIG-High Prime DNA Labelling and Detection Starter Kit II; Roche, Penzberg, Germany). The target gene fragments were amplified using primer pairs C-F/R from F. pseudograminearum genomic DNA. A gap repair method targeting gene fragments was used, and the XhoI-digested plasmid pFL2 was co-transformed into the yeast strain XK1-25 to create complementation strains [33,34]. Following obtained from the Trp+ yeast medium, the fusion constructs transformants were verified by sequencing and were subsequently introduced into the corresponding deletion mutant. Complementary transformants with genetic resistance were identified by PCR using the primer pairs 5F/6R. Supplementary Table S1 contains a list of all primers utilized for deletion, complementation, and gene expression analyses.
2.3. Virulence Assays
The different strains were selected and inoculated on PDA plates for 3 days. Five agar plugs (5 mm each) taken from the colony’s edge were placed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL CMC. The Erlenmeyer flasks were stored at 170 r/min and 25 °C for 5 days. the conidial precipitate collected by centrifugation was suspended in sterile water at 105 spores/mL. The Shixin 828 cultivar (a susceptible cultivar) with full grains was selected for infection testing. Seeds were disinfected using 1% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min. After washing with sterilized water three times, they were immersed in the configured conidial suspension for 5 min. A total of 20 immersed seeds were planted in 15 cm diameter pots containing sterilized soil. The pots were kept at a relative humidity of 60% ± 10% and a day/night temperature of 25/15 ± 5 °C. Disease severity was evaluated 21 days post inoculation (dpi) on a scale of 0 to 5 [35].
Floret injection was used for the wheat head infection test. The conidial suspension was cultured as described previously. At early anthesis, 20 µL conidial suspension was injected into a floret. Each treatment group was inoculated with 30 heads. Disease severity was evaluated at 20 dpi on a scale of 0 to 4 [36].
Both stem base and ear disease severities were represented as disease index (DI).
DI = [∑ (number of diseased plants in this scale × value of this scale)/(total number of plants investigated × highest value of the scale)] × 100.
2.4. RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR Analysis
Mycelial samples were collected from colonies cultured on PDA surfaces. Mycelial RNA was extracted using an RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), performed the library preparation and sequencing. The clean reads were aligned to F. pseudograminearum CS3096 reference genome using TopHat 2.0.8 software with default parameters [37]. Gene expression levels were determined using reads per kilobase per million (RPKM) reads of the mapped sequences. Differences in gene expression between the mutant and wild-type strains were assessed using HTSeq software (v0.9.1) [38]. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined using DESeq2 software (v1.12.4) with a false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p-value < 0.05 [39]. A log2 (fold change) exceeding 1.0, calculated based on the RPKM values of the same gene, signified a fold change between the mutant and wild-type strains. Gene ontology (GO) annotation was performed using GOseq package software (1.54.0) [40]. The analysis of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment was achieved using clusterProfiler v3.8.1 software with a significance threshold of p < 0.05 [41].
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to assess the expression levels of genes related to SM [42]. The mutant and wild-type strains were inoculated on stem bases for 7 dpi, and stem base tissues were collected. Total RNA was extracted as described previously. First-strand cDNA was generated from total RNA using the Fermentas 1st cDNA Synthesis Kit (Hanover, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The expression levels were normalized using the β-tubulin (TUB) gene [43]. Results were computed using the 2−ΔΔCT method [44]. Means and standard deviations were obtained from three biological replicates. Supplementary Table S1 lists the primers used for gene expression analysis.
2.5. Determination of DON Production
Inoculation comprised the placement of three agar plugs of mycelium, each with a 6 mm diameter in 30 mL trichothecene biosynthesis induction medium in a 150 mL Erlenmeyer flask [45]. The Erlenmeyer flasks were agitated at 180 rpm and incubated at 28 °C for 14 d. After processing through a 0.22 μm aqueous filter, the ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) technique was employed to analyze the filtrate obtained from the fermentation broth [46].
2.6. Data Statistics
Fisher’s least significant difference test was used SPSS software (v26.0.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Construction of FpVelB Gene Deletion Mutant Strains
The F. pseudograminearum genome (accession number GCA_000303195.2) harbored a single copy of VelB, which was identified as FpVelB (accession number: XP_009262923.1).
The FpVelB protein, with 460 amino acids (aa), exhibited 46.72% homology with A. nidulans VelB. The positions aa 143–445 of this protein were predicted to constitute the velvet domain through a CD Search on NCBI. The gene encoding FpVelB was interrupted by five introns at positions 431–491, 548–603, 683–741, 1005–1062, and 1364–1427 bp. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using FpVelB and its orthologues from nine other filamentous fungi. The results showed that FpVelB is a conserved homologue of the velvet protein in filamentous fungi, closely related to F. graminearum (Figure 1A).
We generated null-mutants in which the entire ORF of FpVelB was deleted to explore the functions of the FpVelB genes in F. pseudograminearum. Gene replacement constructs with hygromycin resistance were transformed into 2035 wild-type strain protoplasts through polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation. Hygromycin-resistant transformants were confirmed by PCR using four primers and Southern blot analysis.
No product was detected when the ORF primer (FpVelB-5F/6R) was used for the two FpVelB deletion mutants (VDM-1 and VDM-2). The hygromycin gene was successfully detected, and the upstream and downstream recombinations were successfully amplified (Figure 1B). Additionally, single-locus homologous recombination events occurred in the two deletion mutants, as evidenced by the presence of a sole 5.3-kb fragment band hybridized with the hph probe (probe h) in the genomic DNA of FpVelB mutant strains (Figure 1C). Mutations in FpVelB were restored by reintroducing the wild-type allele at different genomic locations via genetic transformation, resulting in the generation of VDM-C strains (Figure 1D).
3.2. FpVelB Is Necessary for Normal Growth and Conidiation
We quantified the mycelial growth of different strains on PDA medium to assess the function of the FpVelB gene in the development of F. pseudograminearum. The growth rate of VDM-1 and VDM-2 were reduced. The mycelia of the two mutant strains became slender, and the colony color changed to yellow (Figure 2A,B). These findings suggest that FpVelB plays a crucial role in vegetative growth of F. pseudograminearum. We further determined the impact of the deletion of the FpVelB gene on conidiation. Conidial production increased in the induced culture medium after the deletion of the FpVelB gene (Figure 2C). This result indicated that FpVelB gene negatively regulated the conidiation of F. pseudograminearum. The reversal of both growth and conidiation phenomena was observed after reintroducing the FpVelB gene into the VDM-1.
3.3. FpVelB Affects Responses of F. pseudograminearum to Abiotic Stress
We examined the inhibition of growth rate in wild-type and mutant strains on CM supplemented with 0.5 M NaCl (osmotic pressure), 3 mM H2O2 (oxidative stress), 0.01% SDS (cell membrane-damaging agent), or 200 mg/L Congo red (a cell wall inhibitor; Figure 3A) to assess the involvement of FpVelB in abiotic stress response. These inhibitors led to varying degrees of vegetative growth inhibition in all the strains; however, significant differences were observed between the mutants and the wild type. The growth rate inhibition in VDM-1 and VDM-2 were more pronounced than in wild-type and complementary strains when exposed to 0.5 M NaCl, 3 mM H2O2, and 0.01% SDS media, respectively. After the deletion of FpVelB, the more sensitive to these three stressors, indicating that FpVelB was involved in resistance to osmotic stress, oxidative stress, and cell membrane integrity in F. pseudograminearum. The sensitivities of VDM-1 and VDM-2 were notably reduced when 200 mg/L Congo red was added to the medium (Figure 3B). This result shows that FpVelB negatively regulated the integrity of cell wall synthesis. In addition, the reintroduction of the FpVelB gene into the deletion mutant strain restored the observed phenomena to resemble those observed in the wild-type strain.
3.4. FpVelB Is Required for Full Virulence
To assess the potential role of FpVelB in disease development, virulence assays was conducted on the basal parts of the stem and flowering head of wheat. The lesion size was quantified, and the DI was calculated following artificial inoculation. At 20 and 21 days post inoculation, the wild-type plants exhibited typical symptoms of crown rot and head blight, respectively (Figure 4A). The FpVelB mutant strains led to a significantly reduced DI at the stem base and head compared to that caused by the wild-type strain (Figure 4B). To substantiate the role of FpVelB in F. pseudograminearum infection, the observation of the infection process was conducted within wheat coleoptile cells by dyeing with wheat germ agglutinin. The observations of the coleoptiles at the wheat seedling stage revealed that those from the wild-type inoculation were filled with mycelia, causing the extensive decomposition and breakage of most plant cells. In contrast, the coleoptiles of the mutant showed only a few mycelia, with the majority of cells remaining intact (Figure 4C). To validate these observations, a complementary study was conducted on the FpVelB gene. These results demonstrated that reintroducing FpVelB into the mutant strain rescued the previously observed phenotype. This clearly indicated the significant role of FpVelB in the virulence of F. pseudograminearum.
3.5. FpVelB Regulates Gene Expressions of SMs including DON
We conducted genome-wide transcriptome analyses (through RNA-seq) between the wild-type and FpVelB deletion mutant VDM-1 to elucidate the regulation of the metabolic pathway influenced by FpVelB (raw RNA-seq data can be found in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number PRJNA1058845). A total of 1324 genes exhibited significant changes in expression levels in the deletion mutants of FpVelB. Upon conducting an expression analysis with a significance level of p < 0.05 and log2foldchange > 1 or <−1, a total of 834 genes were found to be downregulated, whereas the expression of 490 genes increased (Supplementary Figure S2A). A comprehensive GO database was used to elucidate the functions of DEGs. Approximately 60 terms are categorized into three main groups, i.e., “molecular function”, “cellular components”, and “biological process”. The DEGs enriched in cellular components were “membrane”, “membrane-enclosed lumen”, and “supramolecular fiber” categories, which may be associated with the involvement of FpVelB in the integrity of cell membrane and cell wall synthesis. In molecular function, the “antioxidant activity” function of DEGs was enriched (Supplementary Figure S2B). The GO analysis revealed that the most prominent functions of DEGs were enriched in immune-related metabolic pathways, including “response to host immune response”, “evasion or tolerance of host immune response”, and “active evasion of host immune response” (Supplementary Figure S2C). These enriched DEGs may be associated with the involvement of FpVelB in the pathogenicity of F. pseudograminearum. In the KEGG pathway analysis, the biosynthesis of SM DEGs was enriched. In total, 79 genes among 465 significant DEGs were annotated as associated with “secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism” pathways (Figure 5A). The number of downregulated and upregulated genes was 47 and 32, respectively (Figure 5B). The transcriptional levels of the genes in different expression modes were confirmed using qRT-PCR to validate the accuracy of the transcriptomes. The results indicated that the relative expression of the five upregulated and five downregulated genes was consistent between the transcriptomes and qRT-PCR (Figure 5C).
Since DON is an important toxin in F. pseudograminearum, we assessed the transcriptional level of the TRI5 gene and the production of DON in the mutants and 2035 strain under inducing medium conditions. The relative transcript level of TRI5 was reduced by a factor of 50 in the VDM-1 and VDM-2 compared to that in the 2035 strain (Figure 5D). Moreover, in the VDM-1- and VDM-2-induced culture medium, the detections of DON were negligible, whereas the 2035 strain showed a DON level of 1143 at this point (Figure 5E). These findings imply that FpVelB is crucial for the regulation of DON production in F. pseudograminearum.
3.6. PKS11 Gene Regulated by FpVelB Is Involved in Virulence
In the comparison of gene expression between the FpVelB deletion mutant and the wild type, we found that the gene encoding the polyketide synthase PKS11 was downregulated. Twenty genes were identified within the SM gene cluster, containing PKS11. These genes were involved in biosynthesis, transport, and other functions (Table S2). We examined the expression patterns of all genes within this gene cluster throughout the infection process. We observed that most genes within this gene cluster were downregulated during infection. Among these, the most significantly downregulated gene was PKS11, which exhibited nearly a 30-fold decrease in expression (Figure 6A). We constructed a deletion mutant of this key synthase gene (Figure 6B–D). The phenotypic outcomes indicated that knockout of the synthesis gene had no discernible effect on the growth of the pathogen but led to a reduction in pathogenicity (Figure 6E,F). This suggests that the regulation of FpVelB pathogenicity is linked to PKS11 or its gene clusters.
4. Discussion
Although velvet family proteins, such as VelB, have been characterized in numerous species, their functions in Fusarium pseudograminearum are unclear. Our findings revealed that F. pseudograminearum genome harbored a single copy of VelB. Furthermore, this gene is evolutionarily conserved across various fungal species, implying that velvet family proteins likely play crucial roles in fungi. We propose that FpVelB is crucial for growth. Among the closest relatives of F. pseudograminearum within the genus, the disruption of FgVELB also resulted in reduced hyphal growth. Colonies of the deletion mutants are bright yellow [24]. This result serves as robust validation of the present findings. The same effect on growth rate was observed in F. fujikuroi and Botrytis cinerea. FfVEL2 and BcVelB deletion mutants display diminished aerial hyphal growth [47,48]. Nevertheless, the deletion of VelB in Aspergillus flavus, V. mali, and Penicillium expansum had no effect on the vegetative growth of these fungi. The accumulation of pigments continues to be affected [18,19,20]. These studies suggested that the functions of the velvet family of proteins differ among fungi.
Conidiation plays a crucial role in the infection and life cycle of plant pathogenic fungi in natural environments [49]. In the present study, FpVelB negatively regulated conidial production. This mode of action is similar to that of VelB in several fungi including F. graminearum [24], V. mali [18], and B. cinerea [48,50]. In contrast, VelB positively regulates conidiation in A. nidulans [51], A. flavus [19], and P. expansum [20]. Therefore, the regulation of conidiation by VelB is inconsistent among fungal species.
Response mechanisms to abiotic stress are critical for the survival of plant pathogens [52]. Regulation of different stresses is species-specific. In F. verticillioides, the transcription of the catalase-encoding gene FvCAT2 was positively regulated by FvVelB. The resistance of F. verticillioides to oxidative stress is reduced when FvVelB is deleted [25]. Additionally, the lower basal accumulation of glycerol in Curvularia lunata leads to reduced resistance of the ClvelB mutant to stressors [53]. VmVelB positively regulates sensitivity to osmotic, oxidative, and cell wall inhibitor stresses in V. mali [18]. In the model fungus A. nidulans, VelB regulates cell wall synthesis due to the binding to the promoter region of the β-glucan synthase gene fsA [54]. The present study demonstrates that FpVelB positively regulates sensitivity to osmotic, oxidative, and cytomembrane inhibitor stresses. The regulatory effect on the cell wall synthesis inhibitor of FpVelB was negative. Because of the complex form of regulation by VelB, the potential mechanism needs to be further elucidated in F. pseudograminearum.
In pathogenic fungi, VelB can affect virulence through different mechanisms [48]. For example, this velvet protein plays a role in virulence because of its effect on oxalic acid production in B. cinerea [48,50]. The virulence of M. oryzae is also regulated by its participation in appressorial development [55]. Moreover, in V. mali, the regulation of pectinase levels by VmVelB leads to virulence [18]. The main mechanism by which VelB affects virulence is the regulation of SM. For example, the positive regulation of gibberellic acid biosynthesis and the negative regulation of bikaverin biosynthesis by FfVel2 are involved in the virulence of F. fujikuroi [47]. In F. graminearum, two crucial virulence factors, deoxynivalenol and trichothecenes, play important roles in virulence [24,56]. In the necrotrophic fungus, P. expansum, the involvement of VelB in pathogenicity may be related to the regulation of patulin, chaetoglobosin A, citrinin, and fumarylalanine [20]. In this study, we used genome-wide expression analysis to explore the reason for the reduction in virulence. The deletion of the FpVelB gene affected 10% of gene expression. There are twice as many downregulated genes as that of upregulated. In the KEGG pathway analysis, the biosynthesis of SM DEGs was enriched. In total, 79 genes among 465 significant DEGs were annotated as associated with “secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism” pathways. This regulatory result is similar to that seen in P. expansum, where the PeΔvelB strain showed 1180 DEGs, of which 533 were up-expressed and 647 down-expressed. The expression of several backbone genes, including non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), polyketide synthases (PKSs), and dimethylallyl tryptophan synthases (DMATSs) was different in the PeΔvelB strain [20]. More importantly, we demonstrated that FpVelB not only influences virulence by regulating DON production but also participates in virulence by regulating other secondary metabolic synthesis pathways such as PKS11. Fungal PKSs are important in various cellular processes including cellular growth and development, environmental adaptation, and virulence in several pathogenic fungi. PKS11, a member of the PKS family, has been shown to be involved in responses to oxidation, UV irradiation, high temperature, asexual development, and cell wall integrity in Beauveria bassiana. In P. marneffei, the fungal virulence was reduced when pks11 was knocked down [57]. In this study, the PKS11 gene was removed from the FpVelB regulatory gene, and the deletion of PKS11 gene led to the weakening of pathogen virulence, indicating that FpVelB involved in the virulence by regulating PKS11. The result provides a basis for understanding the pathogenesis of F. pseudograminearum.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the results of this study show that the velvet family protein FpVelB regulates vegetative growth, conidiation, and abiotic stress responses in F. pseudograminearum. Moreover, the regulation of virulence by FpVelB was associated with SMs such as DON and the expression of polyketide synthase gene PKS11.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells13110950/s1. Figure S1: Comparison of VelB homology between Fusarium pseudograminearum and Aspergillus nidulans and structures of FpVelB/FpVelB. (A) The amino acid sequences were analyzed using blastp suite in NCBI. (B) The FpVelB protein and domains. The location of the intron. (C) The schematic diagram of deletion mutant generation. Figure S2: Differential expression genes and Gene Ontology (GO) profiles. (A) Volcano map of differentially expressed genes. (B) The genes exhibiting differential expression (DEGs) were organized based on their Gene Ontology (GO) annotations and sorted into three primary groups: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). These DEGs demonstrated a log2 (fold change, FC) exceeding 1.0, with significance determined by a p-value and corrected p-value both less than 0.05. (C) The downregulated genes of FpVelB deletion mutant were organized based on their Gene Ontology. Table S1: Primers used for deletion, complementation, and gene expression. Table S2: The genes showing differential expression between the FpVelB deletion mutant and the wild type. Table S3: The primary classifications of genes with differential expression based on Gene Ontology annotations. Table S4: The pathway that is enriched among genes with differential expression based on KEGG annotations.
Author Contributions
Y.W. (Yuxing Wu): conceptualization, methodology, review, editing and funding acquisition; S.H. and Y.W. (Yajiao Wang): investigation and data curation; Q.L.: validation and writing original draft; L.K.; methodology, supervision, funding acquisition, L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the HAAFS Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Project (2022KJCXZX-ZBS-7), Hebei Natural Science Foundation (C2021301042), the Basic Research Funds of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (2021120201), and National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFD1901300).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Abdulsada R.R., Thompson M., Peitton L., Kelly A., Percy C.D. Fusarium pseudograminearum infected wheat lines vary in disease severity and gas exchange response under different watering regimes. Plant Pathol. 2024;73:602–612. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murray G.M., Brennan J.P. Estimating disease losses to the Australian wheat industry. Australas Plant Pathol. 2009;38:558–570. doi: 10.1071/AP09053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li H., Yuan H., Fu B., Xing X., Sun B., Tang W. First report of Fusarium pseudograminearum causing crown rot of wheat in Henan, China. Plant Dis. 2012;96:1065. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-12-0007-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ji L., Kong L., Li Q., Wang L., Chen D., Ma P. First report of Fusarium pseudograminearum causing Fusarium head blight of wheat in Hebei Province, China. Plant Dis. 2016;100:220. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-15-0643-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Deng Y.Y., Li W., Zhang P., Sun H.Y., Zhang X.X., Zhang A.X., Chen H.G. Fusarium pseudograminearum as an emerging pathogen of crown rot of wheat in eastern China. Plant Pathol. 2019;69:240–248. doi: 10.1111/ppa.13122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kazan K., Gardiner D.M. Fusarium crown rot caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum in cereal crops: Recent progress and future prospects. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018;19:1547–1562. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu F., Shi R., Liu L., Li S., Wang J., Han Z., Liu W., Wang H., Liu J., Fan J., et al. Fusarium pseudograminearum biomass and toxin accumulation in wheat tissues with and without Fusarium crown rot symptoms. Front. Plant Sci. 2024;15:1356723. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1356723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Powell J.J., Carere J., Fitzgerald T.L., Stiller J., Covarelli L., Xu Q., Gubler F., Colgrave M.L., Gardiner D.M., Manners J.M., et al. The Fusarium crown rot pathogen Fusarium pseudograminearum triggers a suite of transcriptional and metabolic changes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Ann. Bot. 2017;119:853–867. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tunali B., Obanor F., Erginbas G., Westecott R.A., Nicol J., Chakraborty S. Fitness of three Fusarium pathogens of wheat. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012;81:596–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wei L., Shulin C., Haiyan S., Xiaoyue Y., Lei X., Xin Z., Yuanyu D., Igor N.P., Yulia A.L., Huaigu C. Genome analyses reveal the secondary metabolites potentially influence the geographical distribution of Fusarium pseudograminearum populations. bioRxiv. 2023;0825:554839. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-23-1743-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Blum A., Benfield A.H., Sørensen J.L., Nielsen M.R., Bachleitner S., Studt L., Beccari G., Covarelli L., Batley J., Gardiner D.M. Regulation of a novel Fusarium cytokinin in Fusarium pseudograminearum. Fungal Biol. 2019;123:255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kang R., Li G., Zhang M., Zhang P., Wang L., Zhang Y., Chen L., Yuan H., Ding S., Li H. Expression of Fusarium pseudograminearum FpNPS9 in wheat plant and its function in pathogenicity. Curr. Genet. 2019;66:229–243. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-01017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hansen F.T., Gardiner D.M., Lysøe E., Fuertes P.R., Tudzynski B., Wiemann P., Sondergaard T.E., Giese H., Brodersen D.E., Sørensen J.L. An update to polyketide synthase and non-ribosomal synthetase genes and nomenclature in Fusarium. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015;75:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brakhage A.A. Regulation of fungal secondary metabolism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:21–32. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bayram O., Braus G.H. Coordination of secondary metabolism and development in fungi: The velvet family of regulatory proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012;36:1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen W., Son Y.-E., Cho H.-J., Choi D., Park H.-S., Yu J.-H. Phylogenomics analysis of velvet regulators in the fungal kingdom. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024;12:e03717-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03717-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bayram O., Krappmann S., Ni M., Bok J.W., Helmstaedt K., Valerius O., Braus-Stromeyer S., Kwon N.J., Keller N.P., Yu J.H., et al. VelB/VeA/LaeA complex coordinates light signal with fungal development and secondary metabolism. Science. 2008;320:1504–1506. doi: 10.1126/science.1155888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu Y., Xu L., Yin Z., Dai Q., Gao X., Feng H., Voegele R.T., Huang L. Two members of the velvet family, VmVeA and VmVelB, affect conidiation, virulence and pectinase expression in Valsa mali. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018;19:1639–1651. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chang P.K., Scharfenstein L.L., Li P., Ehrlich K.C. Aspergillus flavus VelB acts distinctly from VeA in conidiation and may coordinate with FluG to modulate sclerotial production. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013;58–59:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tahtah N., Zetina-Serrano C., Rocher O., Naylies C., Lippi Y., El Khoury A., Atoui A., Jamin E.L., Oswald I.P., Lorber S., et al. Implication of VelB in the development, pathogenicity, and secondary metabolism of Penicillium expansum. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023;195:112121. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhao Y., Lee M.-K., Lim J., Moon H., Park H.-S., Zheng W., Yu J.-H. The putative sensor histidine kinase VadJ coordinates development and sterigmatocystin production in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Microbiol. 2021;59:746–752. doi: 10.1007/s12275-021-1055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Son Y.-E., Park H.-S. Unveiling the Functions of the VosA-VelB Target Gene vidD in Aspergillus nidulans. Mycobiology. 2021;49:258–266. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2021.1926122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu M.-Y., Mead Matthew E., Lee M.-K., Neuhaus George F., Adpressa Donovon A., Martien Julia I., Son Y.-E., Moon H., Amador-Noguez D., Han K.-H., et al. Transcriptomic, Protein-DNA Interaction, and Metabolomic Studies of VosA, VelB, and WetA in Aspergillus nidulans Asexual Spores. mBio. 2021;12:03128-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03128-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jiang J., Yun Y., Liu Y., Ma Z. FgVELB is associated with vegetative differentiation, secondary metabolism and virulence in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012;49:653–662. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lan N., Zhang H., Hu C., Wang W., Calvo A.M., Harris S.D., Chen S., Li S. Coordinated and distinct functions of velvet proteins in Fusarium verticillioides. Eukaryot. Cell. 2014;13:909–918. doi: 10.1128/EC.00022-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lopez-Berges M.S., Hera C., Sulyok M., Schafer K., Capilla J., Guarro J., Di Pietro A. The velvet complex governs mycotoxin production and virulence of Fusarium oxysporum on plant and mammalian hosts. Mol. Microbiol. 2013;87:49–65. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gardiner D.M., Rusu A., Benfield A.H., Kazan K. Map-based cloning identifies velvet A as a critical component of virulence in Fusarium pseudograminearum during infection of wheat heads. Fungal Biol. 2021;125:191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2020.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moura R.D., de Castro L.A.M., Culik M.P., Fernandes A.A.R., Fernandes P.M.B., Ventura J.A. Culture medium for improved production of conidia for identification and systematic studies of Fusarium pathogens. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2020;173:105915. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen L., Ma Y., Peng M., Chen W., Xia H., Zhao J., Zhang Y., Fan Z., Xing X., Li H. Analysis of Apoptosis-Related Genes Reveals that Apoptosis Functions in Conidiation and Pathogenesis of Fusarium pseudograminearum. mSphere. 2021;6:e01140-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01140-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yu J.H., Hamari Z., Han K.H., Seo J.A., Reyes-Dominguez Y., Scazzocchio C. Double-joint PCR: A PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2004;41:973–981. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu Z., Friesen T.L. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Mediated Transformation in Filamentous Fungal Pathogens. In: Bolton M.D., Thomma B.P.H.J., editors. Plant Fungal Pathogens: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ, USA: 2012. pp. 365–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bruno K.S., Tenjo F., Li L., Hamer J.E., Xu J.-R. Cellular localization and role of kinase activity of PMK1 in Magnaporthe grisea. Eukaryot. Cell. 2004;3:1525–1532. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.6.1525-1532.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhou X., Zhang H., Li G., Shaw B., Xu J.-R. The Cyclase-associated protein Cap1 is important for proper regulation of infection-related morphogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002911. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li H.B., Zhou M.X., Liu C.J. A major QTL conferring crown rot resistance in barley and its association with plant height. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009;118:903–910. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0948-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang L.-Y., Xie Y.-S., Cui Y.-Y., Xu J., He W., Chen H.-G., Guo J.-H. Conjunctively screening of biocontrol agents (BCAs) against fusarium root rot and fusarium head blight caused by Fusarium graminearum. Microbiol. Res. 2015;177:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gardiner D.M., McDonald M.C., Covarelli L., Solomon P.S., Rusu A.G., Marshall M., Kazan K., Chakraborty S., McDonald B.A., Manners J.M. Comparative pathogenomics reveals horizontally acquired novel virulence genes in fungi infecting cereal hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002952. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trapnell C., Williams B.A., Pertea G., Mortazavi A., Kwan G., Van Baren M.J., Salzberg S.L., Wold B.J., Pachter L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28:511–515. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Matthew Y., Matthew W., Gordon S., Alicia O. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kanehisa M., Furumichi M., Tanabe M., Sato Y., Morishima K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:353–361. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang L., Xie S., Zhang Y., Kang R., Zhang M., Wang M., Li H., Chen L., Yuan H., Ding S., et al. The FpPPR1 Gene Encodes a Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein That Is Essential for Asexual Development, Sporulation, and Pathogenesis in Fusarium pseudograminearum. Front. Genet. 2020;11:535622. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.535622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang Y., Wang L., Liang S., Zhang P., Kang R., Zhang M., Wang M., Chen L., Yuan H., Ding S., et al. FpDep1, a component of Rpd3L histone deacetylase complex, is important for vegetative development, ROS accumulation, and pathogenesis in Fusarium pseudograminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2020;135:103299. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gardiner D.M., Kazan K., Manners J.M. Nutrient profiling reveals potent inducers of trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009;46:604–613. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Soleimany F., Jinap S., Faridah A., Khatib A. A UPLC–MS/MS for simultaneous determination of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, DON, fumonisins, T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin, in cereals. Food Control. 2012;25:647–653. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.11.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wiemann P., Brown D.W., Kleigrewe K., Bok J.W., Keller N.P., Humpf H.U., Tudzynski B. FfVel1 and FfLae1, components of a velvet-like complex in Fusarium fujikuroi, affect differentiation, secondary metabolism and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2010;77:972–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07263.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang Q., Chen Y., Ma Z. Involvement of BcVeA and BcVelB in regulating conidiation, pigmentation and virulence in Botrytis cinerea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013;50:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sempere F., Santamarina M.P. The conidia formation of several Fusarium species. Ann. Microbiol. 2009;59:663–674. doi: 10.1007/BF03179206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schumacher J., Simon A., Cohrs K.C., Traeger S., Porquier A., Dalmais B., Viaud M., Tudzynski B. The VELVET complex in the gray mold fungus Botrytis cinerea: Impact of BcLAE1 on differentiation, secondary metabolism and virulence. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2015;28:659–674. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-14-0411-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Park H.S., Ni M., Jeong K.C., Kim Y.H., Yu J.H. The role, interaction and regulation of the velvet regulator VelB in Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lawrence C.L., Maekawa H., Worthington J.L., Reiter W., Wilkinson C.R., Jones N. Regulation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Atf1 protein levels by Sty1-mediated phosphorylation and heterodimerization with Pcr1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:5160–5170. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608526200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gao J.X., Yu C.J., Wang M., Sun J.N., Li Y.Q., Chen J. Involvement of a velvet protein ClVelB in the regulation of vegetative differentiation, oxidative stress response, secondary metabolism, and virulence in Curvularia lunata. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:46054. doi: 10.1038/srep46054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Park H.S., Yu Y.M., Lee M.K., Maeng P.J., Kim S.C., Yu J.H. Velvet-mediated repression of beta-glucan synthesis in Aspergillus nidulans spores. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:10199. doi: 10.1038/srep10199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kim H.J., Han J.H., Kim K.S., Lee Y.H. Comparative functional analysis of the velvet gene family reveals unique roles in fungal development and pathogenicity in Magnaporthe oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2014;66:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Merhej J., Urban M., Dufresne M., Hammond-Kosack K.E., Richard-Forget F., Barreau C. The velvet gene, FgVe1, affects fungal development and positively regulates trichothecene biosynthesis and pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012;13:363–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00755.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Meng X., Liao Z., Liu T., Hussain K., Chen J., Fang Q.a., Wang J. Vital roles of Pks11, a highly reducing polyketide synthase, in fungal conidiation, antioxidant activity, conidial cell wall integrity, and UV tolerance of Beauveria bassiana. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2021;181:107588. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2021.107588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.