Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;74(5):2426–2429. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.5.2426-2429.2000

TABLE 2.

Data from longitudinal study: juvenile rodents suspected of having maternal antibody (as determined from ELISA and RT-PCR results)

Capture date (yr/mo/day) Rodent Sexa Ageb Wt (g) ELISAc RT-PCRd
97/07/12 1 F J 10 4
97/08/09 1 F A 25 0
97/08/31 1 F A 27 0
97/06/17 2 F J 12 3
97/07/12 2 F A 14 0
98/06/07 3 M J 8 5
98/06/28 3 M J 12 2
98/06/07 4 M J 8 5
98/06/28 4 M J 14 2
98/07/22 4 M A 14 1
98/08/15 4 M A 14 0
97/08/27 5 F J 9 5
97/09/21 5 F A 20 0
97/10/13 5 F A 18 0
97/08/27 6 M J 8 5
97/09/21 6 M A 13 1
97/08/27 7 F J 8 5
97/09/21 7 F A 11 1
97/10/13 7 F A 14 0
97/11/04 7 F A 14 0
98/06/07 7 F A 19 5 +
98/06/28 7 F A 19 4
98/07/22 7 F A 23 4 +
98/08/15 7 F A 22 3 +
98/09/09 7 F A 26 5 +
98/10/14 7 F A 19 4
98/07/22 8 F J 10 4
98/08/15 8 F A 13 3
98/09/09 8 F A 14 0
98/10/14 8 F A 13 0
98/08/15 9 M A 13 1
98/09/09 9 M A 14 0
98/10/14 9 M A 14 0
98/09/09 10 F J 12 3
98/10/14 10 F A 16 0
a

F, female; M, male. 

b

Juvenile (J) or adult (A), estimated by pelage and weight of animal. 

c

Scored from 0 (negative) to 5 (strong positive). 

d

RT-PCR products were sequenced to confirm authenticity.