Skip to main content
. 2024 May 25;24(11):3411. doi: 10.3390/s24113411

Table 13.

Short-range communication technologies used in V2X.

Technology Range Applications Refs.
Bluetooth
(IEEE 802.15.1)
Up to 10 m Commonly used for the user to access devices and notifications, e.g., in terms of a parking lot’s availability via smartphones or tablets; is used for inner communication between OBUs in the vehicle, e.g., for notification about an engine problem [77,129]
BLE
(IEEE 802.15.1)
Up to 5 m Commonly used for notifications and with battery-functioned small devices.; a small amount of data is used for transmission, e.g., only the device ID; not suitable for inter-vehicular communication or precise localization applications because of its severe fading effects [15]
UWB
(IEEE 802.15.3)
Up to 10 m Because of low signal amplitude, it is less sensitive to the noisy environment and thus has more secure signal transmission, e.g., secure locking and unlocking of vehicles using key fobs; uses radio-based localization with the accuracy of sub-meters [37,76]
Visible Light Communication (VLC)
(IEEE 802.15.7)
Up to 6 m Data transmission between two adjacent vehicles, although a stable communication link between the two vehicles is needed and since the distance between the transmitter and the receiver increases, the transmitted power must also increase; drawbacks can be eliminated by applying distant measurement sensors, e.g., LiDAR additional optical systems to boost the received power [34,39]
Beaconing Up to 5 m Suitable for small amounts of safe data transmission and can be easily implementable; this type is used as an auxiliary means for other technologies, e.g., BLE, to periodically transmit data in the form of beacons with adjustable rate [7,123]
ZigBee
(IEEE 802.15.4)
Up to 100 m One of the common communication choices in smart parking systems; it can broadcast small amounts of data over a short range with a smaller energy consumption compared to Wi-Fi and, theoretically, up to 65 000 devices in a network can be managed; this technology finds it more difficult to penetrate obstacles compared to Wi-Fi, although this drawback may apply to tunnel communication [65,71,128]