Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 6;24(11):3695. doi: 10.3390/s24113695

Table 2.

A comparison of response values between the PANI grafted film sensor and previously reported room-temperature-sensitive polyaniline ammonia gas sensors.

Material Structure CNH3/ppm T/°C Humidity/%RH S 1/- Ref.
PANI Graft 100 50 dry 20 This work
PANI Film 40 20 ± 3 30 4.2 [43]
PANI Nanorod 50 27 50 1.2 [44]
PANI Nanotube 50 25 40 27 [27]
PANI/(PE-co-GMA) Nanofiber 25 26 ± 1 25 ± 3 25 [45]
PVDF@PANI Core–shell 10 25 50 2 [31]
In2O3@PANI Core–shell 100 20 50 45 [23]
GO/PANI Hollow Rambutan 100 20 25 31 [33]
WO3@PANI Nanoplate 100 25 40 33 [22]
PANI/TiO2 Tube 100 R.T. dry 16 [46]
PANI/cellulose Nanofiber 10 R.T. 45 5 [30]
PANI:PSS/Ti3C2TX Nanoplate 10 24 20 3.9 [18]
PANI/HNTs Nanotube 50 25 50 2.6 [26]

1 Some values of S were recalculated to match our definition S = ΔRNH3/R0.