Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 19;18(2):101345. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2024.04.002

Table 4.

Rome III IBS Risk Loci Identified Via GWAS Meta-analyses

CHR Lead SNP Start–end (BP) EA OA EAF GWAS
Credible
Variants, n
Gene mapping Novel risk locus
IBS subtype OR (95% CI) P value OR in individual cohorts (UKBB/LL) P-Het
5 rs6899057 7188657–7257239 T C 0.36 IBS 1.07 (1.04–1.09) 2.0E-08 1.07/1.03 0.40 41 ADCY2e x
IBS-M 1.09 (1.05–1.12) 2.3E-08 1.08/1.09 0.97
8 rs2048419 8524474–8730488 A G 0.53 IBS-M 1.08 (1.05–1.11) 4.4E-08 1.08/1.03 0.34 77 CLDN23e
ERI1e
MFHAS1p,e
PPP1R3Be
TNKSe
11 rs2035380 13267867–13346294 T C 0.30 IBS 1.07 (1.04–1.09) 3.1E-08 1.07/1.04 0.46 99 BMAL1p,e
13 rs9517497 99594682–99612588 T C 0.63 IBS 1.07 (1.04–1.09) 2.3E-08 1.06/1.09 0.48 20 DOCK9p,e x

BP, base-pair position (genome build hg19); CHR, chromosome; CI, confidence interval; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; GWAS, genome-wide association study; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-M, irritable bowel syndrome mixed subtype; LL, Lifelines; OA, other allele; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; UKBB, UK Biobank.

OR in individual cohorts: magnitude of mean effects described to the risk allele in UKBB and LL individual GWAS; P-Het: Cochran's Q statistics P value for heterogeneity across individual GWAS; Number of credible variants: number of markers in each fine-mapped credible set per risk locus; Gene mapping: genes mapped to the locus, based on FUMA positional (p) or cis-eQTL (e) analyses. The best candidate genes at each locus are highlighted in bold.