Table 2.
Subgroup analysis of KAP towards COVID-19 among pregnant women in Africa.
| Knowledge | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Pooled estimate with 95 %(CI) | I2 (p-value) | % Weight |
| Eastern | 56.71 % (“46.81″ to “66.61″) | 92.2 % (<0.001) | 44.53 |
| Western | 65.62 % (“53.25″ to “77.98″) | 95.7 % (<0.001) | 55.47 |
| Attitude | |||
| Region | Pooled estimate with 95 %(CI) | I2 (p-value) | % Weight |
| Eastern | 62.21 % (“38.30″ to “86.12″) | 96.3 % (<0.001) | 49.85 |
| Western | 41.43 % (“11.77″ to “71.09″) | 98.2 % (<0.001) | 50.15 |
| Practice | |||
| Region | Pooled estimate with 95 %(CI) | I2 (p-value) | % Weight |
| Eastern | 49.42 % (“38.26″ to “60.57″) | 94.4 % (<0.001) | 7.14 |
| Western | 97.6 % (“35.99″ to “75.66″) | 55.82 % (<0.001) | 7.21 |
Legend: CI= Confidence Interval.
This table highlights regional differences in KAP towards COVID-19 among pregnant women in Africa. It categorizes regions into Western and Eastern Africa. For each region, it presents percentages of participants with good knowledge, positive attitudes, and good practices regarding COVID-19 preventive measures, along with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistics indicating heterogeneity.