Abstract
Sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) can be detected on prenatal diagnostic testing and cell free DNA screening (cfDNA). High risk cfDNA results should be confirmed with diagnostic testing. This summary article serves as an update for prenatal providers and assimilates data from neurodevelopmental, epidemiologic, and registry studies on the most common SCA. This information can be helpful for counseling after prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy. Incidence estimates may be influenced by ascertainment bias and this article is not a substitute for interdisciplinary consultation and counseling.
1 |. INTRODUCTION
Sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) as a group are the most common chromosomal disorders, affecting up to 1 in 400 newborns.1 SCAs have a less severe phenotypic range than autosomal aneuploidies and most individuals with a SCA have intelligence in the normal range. However, there are a range of medical, neurodevelopmental, and psychiatric issues that can occur in people with SCA, though phenotypes vary significantly between different SCA and among individuals with the same chromosomal difference. This variability makes it challenging to provide accurate and tailored prenatal counseling for pregnancies with SCA.
Cell free DNA (cfDNA)-based screening for aneuploidy is an established prenatal test available to women from 10 weeks of gestation.2 CfDNA is currently the only aneuploidy screening method able to specifically assess the probability of an SCA, and due to its widespread adoption, prenatal detection of it has increased in recent years.2 Accurate and balanced patient counseling including discussion of the limitations of cfDNA for SCA and the variability of the phenotypes is essential as it may impact decision-making about the pregnancy.
There is considerable ascertainment bias in the literature on the long-term outcomes of SCA, which hampers accurate prenatal counseling. Individuals with mild or no discernable phenotype may never be diagnosed with SCA, and as a result, our understanding of the phenotypic spectrum of SCA may be skewed toward those with more severe manifestations.1,3–5
Recent data from Denmark compared the expected prevalence based on historical cytogenetic surveys versus known nationwide prevalence of SCA based on registry data. These newborn data suggest that a clinical diagnosis of an SCA (including mosaic forms) is obtained on: 70% of people with 45,X and mosaics, 23% with 47,XXY, 7% with 47,XXX or higher order X chromosome aneuploidy, and 9% of 47, XYY (including mosaicism and isochromosomes of Y).6
In this review, we summarize the essential information to discuss with expectant couples when a diagnosis of SCA has been made in the prenatal setting. Ideally, patients would have their care provided by a multidisciplinary team including obstetricians, maternal–fetal medicine specialists, genetic counselors, geneticists, and pediatric endocrinologists.
2 |. DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY
What is sex chromosome aneuploidy?
SCAs are characterized by a numerical gain or loss of the X and Y chromosomes or structural chromosomal rearrangement.1 The most common SCAs in newborn populations include 47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), 47,XYY (XYY syndrome, or Jacobs syndrome), 47, XXX (Triple X syndrome), and 45,X and mosaicism (Turner syndrome [TS]). A cord blood study from 35,000 newborns in Denmark found that SCAs as a group were more common than any individual autosomal aneuploidy with an incidence of 1 per 448 children.7 For comparison, trisomy 21 had an incidence of 1 per 592 children (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
The incidence of SCA at livebirth in a cohort of newborns in Denmark (Nielsen 1991) and estimated incidence in Berglund et al. 2020
| Type of SCA | Incidence at livebirth in Denmark newborns (Nielsen 1991) | Incidence at livebirth (Berglund et al 2020) |
|---|---|---|
| 47,XXY and mosaicism | 1.73 per 1000 | 1.52 per 1000 males |
| 47,XYY | 1.18 per 1000 | 0.98 per 1000 males |
| 47,XXX | 1.06 per 1000 | 0.84 per 1000 females |
| 45,X | 0.53 per 1000 | 0.50 per 1000 females |
| Other SCA | 0.09 per 1000 |
Abbreviation: SCA, sex chromosome aneuploidy.
3 |. CYTOGENETIC ORIGINS OF SCA
What caused this? Am I responsible for this?
An unbalanced complement of the sex chromosomes can arise as the gametes develop (meiotic error), or following fertilization (mitotic errors). The sex chromosomes are more likely to undergo errors than the autosomes due to a distinctive process of replication, pairing, and unique gene content. Two pseudoautosomal region (PAR) sites (PAR1, PAR2) pair to facilitate recombination between the X and Y chromosomes during replication. The X chromosome’s higher guanosine—cytosine nucleotide content and the phenomenon of X-inactivation both contribute to this relative instability.7–11 In most cases of 45,X, the missing X chromosome is paternal in origin, and the risk of a 45,X conception is therefore not related to maternal age. In contrast, the sex chromosome trisomies are usually associated with an extra maternal copy, and therefore are associated with maternal age.11–16 Alternatively, an oocyte may be normally fertilized and a sex chromosome lost during early mitotic division errors.16,17 Mosaicism, where one euploid and one or more aneuploid cell lines develop, is also more common with the sex chromosomes than autosomes, as discussed in subsequent sections.11,18
Key counseling points
Most of the people in the world with SCA are probably undiagnosed. Studies comparing newborn screening prevalence to registry studies suggest clinical diagnostic rates of 70% for 45,X, 23% for 47,XXY, 7% for 47,XXX, and 9% for 47, XYY.
Couples should be reassured that SCAs are not caused by parental behaviors or environmental exposures. Unique molecular features of the sex chromosomes make mosaicism and aneuploidy more common than with autosomes.
4 |. DIAGNOSIS
What further tests are recommended once sex chromosome aneuploidy is suspected in the fetus?
After a positive cfDNA screening test or ultrasound anomaly is detected, patients should be offered a comprehensive ultrasound, genetic counseling, and the option of prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing. Screening tests alone should not be used to make clinical decisions due to the potential for false positive screening results.2,12,19–26
When 45,X is suspected by cfDNA, patient counseling should include a discussion of whether to pursue confirmatory diagnosis by a chorionic villus sampling before 14 weeks or await an amniocentesis after 15 weeks.27 This is because confined placental mosaicism is common in 45,X when the fetus does not exhibit any of the usual ultrasound features of monosomy X (increased nuchal translucency, hydrops, and cystic hygroma).12,28,29 The overall PPV for monosomy X has ranged from 14% to 66% in prior studies.28 With a normal first trimester ultrasound and a high risk cfDNA for monosomy X, a large cytogenetic study estimated that a positive predictive value (PPV) is between 50% and 75%, whereas the PPV may be as high as 99% when an ultrasound finding is present.12,30 With a normal first trimester ultrasound and positive cfDNA for monosomy X, an amniocentesis would best characterize the fetal composition and avoid confusion with the placental karyotype.29 This high rate of placental mosaicism of 45,X/46,XX is not true for the other SCAs. For positive cfDNA for XXX, XXY, and XYY, the placental karyotype will reflect the fetal karyotype in over 90% of cases.12
Key counseling points
cfDNA screening can detect SCA but with lower accuracy than for trisomy 21.
Genetic counseling is recommended for couples where a prenatal diagnosis of SCA is suspected.
5 |. 45,X AND MOSAIC 45,X
5.1 |. 45X and mosaic 45,X—Prenatal medical considerations
The gestational age at detection of 45,X and evidence of a mosaic cell line in the fetus are important for pregnancy prognosis and counseling. Non-mosaic 45,X conceptions often present in the first trimester with an enlarged nuchal translucency, cystic hygroma, and/or hydrops and frequently end in miscarriage.17,31 An additional 7.5% loss rate in the second trimester has been noted.32 The presence of mosaicism increases the chance of a live birth outcome.32–34
During the second trimester, close ultrasound examination of the fetus is warranted to look for associated abnormalities including renal anomalies, growth restriction, oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios, and congenital heart disease (particularly left-sided anomalies). Coarctation of the aorta is the classic cardiac finding in children with 45,X but can be difficult to discern on prenatal ultrasound.22 In the absence of ultrasound anomalies, a prenatal diagnosis of fetal TS does not require any major changes to obstetric management.
5.2 |. 45,X and mosaic 45,X—Postnatal medical considerations
Infants with 45,X or mosaic 45,X are usually born uneventfully with typical female genitalia if there is no Y chromosome component present. Indeed, many 45,X/mosaic 45,X individuals are not diagnosed until puberty or even adulthood (Table 2).22 There are potential significant health impacts of this diagnosis, however, and clinical assessment and follow-up should be with a multidisciplinary team with cardiology, endocrinology, and otolaryngology expertise. In infancy, a postnatal karyotype, echocardiogram, renal ultrasound, and evaluation for congenital hip dysplasia are recommended.22 Special attention to growth and feeding in the first year of life is needed as 50% of infants may have failure to thrive in this period.22
TABLE 2.
Selected prevalence of features of individuals with Turner syndrome
| Features of Turner syndrome | Approximate prevalence |
|---|---|
| A. Medical features | |
| Growth failure and reduced adult height | 95%–100% |
| Ovarian insufficiency and infertility | 95% |
| Delayed bone age | 85% |
| Decreased bone mineral content | 50%–80% |
| Hypertension | 50% |
| Bicuspid aortic valve | 14%–34% |
| Coarctation of the aorta | 7%–14% |
| Aortic dilation/aneurysm | 3%–42% |
| Hearing defects | 30% |
| Lymphedema of the hands and feet | 25% |
| Psychological and behavioral problems | 25% |
| Abnormality of renal pelvis, ureters, or vessels | 15% |
| Horseshoe kidney | 10% |
| Glucose intolerance | 15%–50% |
| Thyroid disease | 15%–30% |
|
| |
| B. Physical differences | |
| Small and recessed jaw | 60% |
| Cubitus valgus | 50% |
| Low posterior hairline, broad chest | 40% |
| Short fourth metacarpals of the hands | 35% |
| Epicanthus | 20% |
| External ear differences | 15% |
|
| |
| C. Neurocognitive features | |
| Average or above average intelligence | 90% |
| Nonverbal learning disorder | 40% |
| Difficulty with mathematics | 50%–75% |
| Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder | 25% |
Adapted from Table 7 of Gravholt et al. (2017).
While some individuals with monosomy X may have characteristic physical features associated with TS, these differences can be subtle and vary considerably (Table 2). Short stature is common and often manifest by 4–6 years of age. All people with a 45, X cell line should be followed at least yearly by a pediatric endocrinologist. Growth hormone therapy may be considered to improve growth and final adult height.22
People with 45,X are at increased risk of a number of medical conditions including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypothyroidism, celiac disease, autoimmune conditions, liver disease, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Epidemiologic studies based on nationwide registry data show an increase in overall mortality for people with 45,X, with 41% of the additional mortality risk due to cardiovascular disease.1,34 Regular surveillance and standard management for these conditions is important to improve long-term outcomes.22
5.3 |. 45,X and mosaic 45,X—Gonadal and reproductive issues
Adolescents and adults with non-mosaic monosomy X have hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, which may result in primary or secondary amenorrhea and ovarian insufficiency and infertility. Due to the long-term effects of hypogonadism on health and bone density and to facilitate physical maturation including secondary sex traits, estrogen and progesterone replacement is often started in late childhood or early teen years. Individuals should be followed by pediatric endocrinology even if spontaneous menses occur and oocyte preservation can be discussed.22
Spontaneous pregnancies occur in only 5% of individuals with 45, X but assisted reproductive technology (with or without oocyte donation) may assist women with 45,X. Discussion of reproductive options and early referral to reproductive endocrinology for discussion of fertility preservation can be considered as early as the teenage years.35 If certain maternal congenital heart lesions are present, such as a dilated aorta (aortic size index greater than 2.0 cm/m2), infertility treatment and/or pregnancy may be deemed unsafe due to the risk of aortic dissection and death. For those people with 45,X who achieve pregnancy, the rate of pregnancy complications and miscarriage is higher than the general population and their pregnancies should be closely monitored.36,37
5.4 |. 45,X and mosaic 45,X—Neurodevelopmental considerations
With regard to learning and development, there are consistent themes among neurocognitive profiles and personality traits for individuals with monosomy X. The vast majority (90%) of individuals have average or above average intelligence, but learning differences are common (Table 2C). These include variable degrees of nonverbal learning disability, characterized by difficulty with social communication, spatial reasoning, and executive function.22
5.5 |. 45,X/46,XY mosaicism
45,X mosaicism with a 46,XY or other Y chromosome-containing cell line has very different implications from 45,X/45,XX mosaicism. The presence of Y chromosome material can lead to differences in sexual development (DSD). External genitalia may develop into typically female, typically male, or neither typically male nor female (intersex). The presence of Y chromosome material with a dysgenic gonad increases the risk of gonadoblastoma, which is further increased if the gonad is undescended.38,39 The percentage of Y chromosome-containing cells on the peripheral blood karyotype may correlate with degree of virilization of the external genital structures, but this association is imperfect. Some features of TS are common in those with Y chromosome mosaicism, such as reduced growth, and gonadal dysfunction. Liver dysfunction, autoimmune disease, and learning concerns are also common, and warrant routine screening and follow-up.22 Notable ascertainment bias has been noted in postnatal cohorts, which makes precise prenatal counseling challenging. In one retrospective series, 92% of prenatal diagnoses were noted to have a normal male postnatal phenotype whereas among the postnatally ascertained patients, 43% were phenotypic females with TS features, 42% had mixed gonadal dysgenesis (asymmetric gonadal development with a unilateral dysgenic testis), and 15% had a male phenotype with incomplete masculinization.40
Up to 12% of phenotypically female patients with a diagnosis of TS have some Y chromosome sequence.22,41 PCR of Y chromosome centromeric sequences should be considered in 45,X individuals with unexplained virilization (where the previous karyotype or FISH has not detected the Y chromosome), or when a marker chromosome is present.22 Due to the 10% risk of gonadoblastoma, gonadectomy is recommended for phenotypically female patients when Y chromosome mosaicism is present, though the ideal timing of gonadectomy is unclear.22,39
5.6 |. 45,X and mosaic 45,X key counseling points
People with 45,X and 45,X mosaicism have an increased risk of a range of health issues, including short stature, congenital heart disease, kidney and urinary tract anomalies, cardiometabolic disease, autoimmune disorders, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, ovarian insufficiency, and infertility.
The characteristic physical features include short stature, a low hairline, and distinctive facial features. There is also a higher chance of learning differences in the setting of normal intelligence. These features can be subtle and variable.
Fetuses with 45,X are at increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth and congenital anomalies, structural differences to the heart, and other health complications.
The presence of 45,X with mosaicism including Y chromosome material can lead to DSD or gonadoblastoma risk and influences patient counseling.
The postnatal care of infants and children with 45,X +/− mosaicism should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, including pediatric endocrinology.
6 |. 47,XXY (KLINEFELTER SYNDROME)
Infants with 47,XXY are usually born healthy and without major physical differences. Prior to the use of cfDNA screening, it was estimated that only 25%–35% of people with 47,XXY were diagnosed in their lifetime and of those diagnosed, 20% were diagnosed in adulthood in the setting of hypogonadism or infertility.1,3 A prenatal diagnosis of 47,XXY, or Klinefelter syndrome (KS), should not result in any major changes to prenatal care or the plan for delivery in the absence of congenital malformations. There is an increased risk of cryptorchidism and, rarely, microphallus, and this should be considered in the fetal and newborn assessment.42–44
6.1 |. 47,XXY medical and psychiatric considerations
Medical and psychiatric conditions are reported to be more common in 47,XXY, but estimates should be interpreted with caution in light of the known ascertainment bias that exists in the literature. A Danish registry study of 832 individuals with Klinefelter syndrome showed increased overall mortality (hazard ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.7) with a median survival 5.6 years lower than controls.1,42 The median age of diagnosis of KS was 27.5 years (range: 0.0–82.8) (Table 3).1 The range of diagnoses associated with hospital episodes for individuals with KS is broad but include seizures, venous thromboembolism, cancers, respiratory disorders, metabolic and endocrine disorders, infections, and trauma.45,46 There are inherent limitations of hospital diagnosis code-based research, which is evident from the lower-than-expected rate of gynecomastia and hypogonadism in this study. The most accurate data for counseling comes from epidemiologic studies of newborn screening with the karyotype, as registry and clinical data may overestimate risks for prenatally diagnosed cases.5,45,46
TABLE 3.
Hazard ratio of mortality, cohabitation, having children, and attaining a bachelor’s degree for sex chromosome aneuploidies
| Turner syndrome HR (95% CI) | Klinefelter syndrome HR (95% CI) | 47,XXX syndrome HR (95% CI) | 47,XYY syndrome HR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality | 2.9 (2.4–3.5) | 1.4 (1.1–1.7) | 2.5 (1.6–3.9) | 3.6 (2.6–5.1) |
| Cohabitation | 0.45 (0.40–0.50) | 0.66 (0.59–0.72) | 0.68 (0.49–0.95) | 0.50 (0.37–0.66) |
| Children | 0.18 (0.16–0.21) | 0.24 (0.21–0.27) | 0.64 (0.48–0.85) | 0.35 (0.26–0.46) |
| Bachelor’s Degree | 1.00 (0.87–1.15) | 0.27 (0.20–0.37) | 0.36 (0.18–0.73) | 0.35 (0.18–0.71) |
Abbreviation: HR, Hazard ratio.
Adapted from Berglund et al. (2020).
In one clinically ascertained series of 57 prenatal and postnatal diagnoses, 36% of participants met criteria for ADHD, mostly of the inattentive subtype.46 Rates of Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in clinical series range from 5% to 27% (relative to general prevalence of 1%–1.4% in male children) and psychiatric diagnoses of anxiety in 14%–32% and depression 12%–24%, respectively.47,48
6.2 |. 47,XXY gonadal and reproductive issues:
Adolescents and adults with 47,XXY have hypergonadotropic hypogonadism with decreased production of testosterone, though testosterone production may be preserved well into the third decade.3 While most adolescents enter puberty normally, they should be monitored by a pediatric endocrinologist and in some cases, testosterone replacement therapy may be indicated.49 Adults with 47,XXY have infertility, small testicles, and reduced sperm numbers. Indeed, many adults first receive their diagnosis during investigations for infertility. Reproductive therapies utilizing testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection have current success rates of up to 50%.42,50 The risk of SCA in their offspring is estimated at less than 1% and is similar to the aneuploidy rate of other individuals with nonobstructive azoospermia.3,50
6.3 |. 47,XXY neurodevelopmental profile
Although individuals with 47,XXY are at increased risk for developmental delays, learning disabilities, and psychiatric concerns compared with the general population, these are variable and not always present. Precise quantification of the incidence of neuropsychiatric findings is challenging due to ascertainment bias in most studies. The studies with the least risk of ascertainment bias are based on newborn screening data and are excellently summarized in a paper by Tartaglia and colleagues (see Table 4).46
TABLE 4.
Summary of neurodevelopmental, medical, and gonadal function in sex chromosome trisomy described in the 1970s birth cohorts, adapted from Tartaglia et al. 2020
| XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) N = 95 | XYY (Jacobs syndrome) N = 59 | XXX (triple X) N = 46 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurodevelopmental | Early developmental delay | 70%, usually mild, speech delay more than motor | 80%, usually mild, speech delay more than motor | 55%, usually mild, speech delay more than motor |
| Learning disabilities | 64%–85% (esp. reading) | ~55% | 75%–100% (esp. reading) | |
| Mean cognitive (IQ) | 10–15 points lower than normal; nonverbal more than verbal | 5–10 points lower than normal; usually verbal = nonverbal | 10–15 points lower than normal; nonverbal more than verbal | |
| Behavior/Social-emotional | Shy, social difficulties; immature, attentional problems | Hyperactivity; negative mood; impulsivity | Shy, anxiety, social difficulties; sensory integration problems | |
| Motor skills | Motor delays, coordination and motor planning problems | Increased rate of balance and coordination problems | Motor delays, coordination problems, low strength | |
|
| ||||
| Physical/medical | Average birth size | Slightly smaller | Normal | Smaller |
| Congenital anomalies | Modest increase | Rare | Rare | |
| Dysmorphisms | Minimal: Hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, clinodactyly, small head circumference | No dysmorphisms reported, normal head circumference | Minimal: Hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, clinodactyly, small head circumference | |
| Growth and body habitus | Tall stature; long legs, increased growth velocity starting at 5 years; excess weight gain | Tall stature, long legs, thinner than XXY, delayed growth spurt | Tall stature; increased growth velocity starting at 7 years; abdominal pain (25%) | |
| Muscle tone | Hypotonia | Hypotonia | Hypotonia | |
|
| ||||
| Gonadal function | Prepubertal gonadal function | Cryptorchidism in 10%–20%; small testes in 65% at 6 months; slow penile growth; testosterone under assay detection limit; bone age delayed (−2 SD) | Testes and penile size in the normal range; normal testosterone | Nothing reported in infancy, high FSH in mid-childhood; bone age delayed (−1 SD) |
| Puberty timing and course | Testes enlarge to max of 10 ml, high LH & FSH after Tanner 3, testosterone plateaus in late puberty | Early onset testicular enlargement, normal testosterone levels | Thelarche and menarche late-normal, precocious puberty also reported | |
| Adult function/fertility | Infertility, 90% with low testosterone | Assumed normal fertility | ~10% secondary amenorrhea; pregnancies in 9 of 37 | |
Learning differences can range from mild to more severe.3,47 A study based on newborn screens found that intelligence scores were shifted 5–10 points lower than controls and siblings but still in the average range.3,47 Individuals can have particular difficulties in expressive language, auditory processing, and auditory memory.47,51,52 An increased frequency of dyslexia has been noted as well.44,50,51 These learning differences may be responsive to intervention, and thus regular evaluation and developmental supports are important. Hypotonia may affect some infants, which may contribute to delayed milestones such as crawling and walker in 50% of children with 47,XXY.3
There is evidence that children with a prenatal diagnosis have better functional and cognitive outcomes, better social-emotional functioning, and fewer behavioral difficulties.5,52,53 In many states, children with SCA automatically qualify for early intervention (from birth to 36 months) or early childhood special education (from 3 to 5 years) for additional developmental support.54,55 Use of testosterone in the neonatal period for infants with 47,XXY remains controversial and is not the standard of care. Previous work has suggested a benefit for neurodevelopmental outcomes, but to date, this has not been borne out in head-to-head trials.3,56,57
6.4 |. 47,XXY key counseling points
Many people with 47,XXY are not diagnosed in their lifetime (65%–75%) or not identified until an infertility workup in adulthood.
People with 47,XXY generally have normal intelligence but may have developmental delays, mental health disorders, and learning differences. These respond well to developmental supports.
Early diagnosis of 47,XXY allows monitoring of testosterone levels and learning supports that may modify disease risks and lifestyle differences.
Infertility treatments (ICSI/IVF) are available with success rates of up to 50%.
7 |. 47,XYY
Individuals with 47,XYY typically have few physical differences compared with the general population and have normal pubertal development. Studies have suggested an increased risk for different medical conditions, developmental delays, learning disabilities, and mental health disorders compared with the general population.7 However, given the historically low rate of diagnosis of 47,XYY (~10%), most available data is complicated by ascertainment bias and/or small sample sizes, making quantification of the incidence of medical and neurodevelopmental findings very challenging.6
7.1 |. 47,XYY medical considerations
In Danish registry data of hospital discharge diagnoses from 251 individuals with 47, XYY, there were significant differences in several health conditions. Specifically, the incidence rate ratio (95% CI) for chronic obstructive lung disease was 5.79 (2.42–15.15), lower respiratory tract infection 12.52 (6.23–25.16), asthma 5.88 (3.38–10.22), cryptorchidism 4.88 (2.25–10.56), and malformations of the feet 29.76 (5.55–159.58).45 This data has the inherent limitations of coding and prescription-based research, and it was estimated that 20% of individuals with 47,XYY in Denmark were diagnosed; so these figures are likely biased by clinical ascertainment. However, the more nuanced information on medical comorbidities in 47,XYY may be helpful for patient counseling. This data also showed that overall mortality for people with 47,XYY was increased with an HR of 3.6, which lowered to 2.7 when marital and education status were taken into account. The median survival was 10.4 years shorter than controls and diagnosis was made at a median of 15.1 years (range: 0.0–70.7).45,58
7.2 |. 47,XYY neurodevelopmental profile
Learning differences have been noted including mild developmental delays and a 5–10 point downward IQ shift from siblings and controls, see Table 4.46 As with 47,XXY, there have been noted differences between behavioral and developmental profiles in prenatal versus postnatal diagnosis.4,59 In one series, 11% of 35 individuals from a prenatal cohort had a diagnosis of ASD or pervasive developmental delay, which is increased relative to the general childhood prevalence of 1%–1.4%.4 In this same series, 40% of the 55 postnatally diagnosed individuals had ASD or pervasive developmental delay. Bipolar disorder was present in the postnatally diagnosed group and not present in the prenatal diagnosis group (bipolar childhood prevalence of 0.4%–6.3%).4
7.3 |. 47,XYY key counseling points
Data on medical and neurodevelopmental differences in 47,XYY should be interpreted with caution because based on expected incidence from newborn studies, only 10%–20% of individuals with 47,XYY receive a diagnosis in their lifetime, leading to ascertainment bias.
An example of the ascertainment bias includes the markedly different rates of neuropsychiatric disorders in cohorts diagnosed before birth or during childhood.
Those with 47,XYY may have an increased risk of lung disease, foot malformations, and cryptorchidism.
8 |. 47,XXX
Most children born with 47,XXX will not have notable physical differences. This is reflected in the estimate that only 10% of cases of 47,XXX are ever clinically detected.5,7 However, 47,XXX is associated with an increased risk of congenital abnormalities compared to the general population including orofacial clefts, clubfoot, and cardiac anomalies, which may be identified on anatomic ultrasound. The most common abnormalities are of the genitourinary system.5,55,60 47,XXX fetuses are not known to be at increased risk for other prenatal or neonatal complications compared to the general population. In the absence of an ultrasound anomaly, a prenatal diagnosis of 47,XXX should not result in any major changes to prenatal care or the plan for delivery. Postnatally, a neonatal echocardiogram and renal ultrasound can be considered to rule out structural anomalies that may not have been seen prenatally.
8.1 |. 47,XXX medical and psychiatric considerations
Other health concerns include dental disorders, pes planus, scoliosis, tremor, seizure disorders, constipation, and environmental or food allergies. Individuals with 47,XXX had menarche at a mean age of 12 but have an increased risk of primary ovarian insufficiency with 67% of people in one study having an anti-Mullerian hormone less than the 2.5%.5,61,62
Epidemiologic studies based on registry data from individuals diagnosed postnatally have shown that overall mortality for people with 47,XXX was increased with an HR of 2.5 and median survival 7 years shorter than controls. Diagnosis was made at a median age of 17.9 years (range: 0.0–73.2). Hospital discharge data utilized to assess health issues in adult life showed an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (HR 2.4), urologic disease (HR 10), unspecified diseases (HR 7.4), and chromosomal disorders and congenital defects (HR 64).63 The same risks of ascertainment bias should be considered when interpreting this data, as discussed in the 47,XXY and 47,XYY sections.
8.2 |. 47,XXX neurodevelopmental profile
Individuals with 47,XXX are at increased risk of developmental delays, learning disabilities, and mental health disorders compared with the general population, though these findings are variable and not present in every case.46 Among a prenatally detected cohort, about 30% of people with 47,XXX did not have learning differences while 70% had learning differences.5 In a series of 74 individuals, when prenatal and postnatal diagnoses were considered together, 72% had a speech delay, 31% had a current language disorder, 50% had a motor delay, 49% had ADHD, 19% had an anxiety disorder, 13% had intellectual disability, 13% had bipolar disorder or psychosis, and 11% had ASD. Among the prenatally diagnosed, mean standardized testing for intelligence scores were in the average range, though 10–15 points lower than siblings and controls (Table 4).5
8.3 |. 47,XXX key counseling points
Individuals with 47,XXX may have increased rates of congenital abnormalities relative to the general population; specifically, findings in the genitourinary system, orofacial clefts, clubfoot, and cardiac defects can be seen.
Data on medical and neurodevelopmental differences should be interpreted with caution because only 10%–20% of people with 47,XXX are thought to be diagnosed, leading to ascertainment bias.
47,XXX have increased risk of developmental delays, learning disabilities, and mental health disorders compared with the general population, though these are variable.
9 |. FETAL THERAPY
Can we do anything before birth?
The chromosomal differences that are detected through prenatal testing and screening cannot be changed with prenatal interventions. Specifically, there are no current gene therapies or intrauterine procedures that can be utilized to change the DNA content of fetal cells affected by SCA.
10 |. COUNSELING IMPLICATIONS
How will counseling about an SCA diagnosis influence my patient?
A prenatal diagnosis of SCA can be very anxiety-producing for patients.64,65 The majority of those who receive an SCA diagnosis have no prior knowledge before their conversations with disclosing providers.64,65 Thus, the initial conversations with a care team may influence the patient’s next steps, sometimes despite subsequent counseling by subspecialists more familiar with SCA.65–68 Results disclosure in person with both parents present is preferred by patients.66 Prior studies have noted significant increased rates of termination when counseled by providers without genetic specialization.69,70 The use of person-first, inclusive, and non-stigmatizing language when discussing genetic diagnoses and possible disability is imperative for counseling. There is uncertainty in every diagnosis, but the range of possible outcomes and bias in existing data in SCA requires updated information, nondirective counseling, and patientcentered communication. Patients should be supported with updated reference materials and connected to additional resources (such as those below) for additional information.65,66 Given the challenges with these diagnoses, routine testing is controversial, and several countries such as the Netherlands do not permit prenatal screening for SCA.
11 |. FUTURE RECURRENCE RISK/PREVENTION
Can I do anything to prevent this from happening again in future pregnancies?
Most parents will have chromosomally typical children in subsequent pregnancies.70 Rarely, some families may have an increased risk of recurrence due to testicular or ovarian mosaicism or a structural rearrangement of the chromosomes. A careful family history and parental karyotypes can give patients more refined recurrence risk estimates if there are recurrent pregnancies with SCA or recurrent pregnancy loss. In three quarters of cases of 45,X, the paternal X chromosome is absent. Fathers of non-mosaic 45,X fetuses may be at slightly increased risk to produce sperm that are missing a chromosome.16
Polysomies (XXX, XXYY, XYYY, XXXY, XXXXX, and XXXXY) are individually quite rare as they are the product of multiple nondisjunctions in one parent and they seem to arise sporadically.71 There is no evidence that the recurrence risk is elevated above the age-specific risk in future pregnancies.
12 |. CONCLUSIONS
Differences in the sex chromosomes can be detected in pregnancy through screening and confirmed with diagnostic testing in pregnancy or after birth. With increasing use of cfDNA technologies, providers are more likely to be returning high risk SCA screening results to patients and providing further counseling. As detailed above, the health and learning differences of people with SCA can be subtle and variable, and there is significant bias in the literature due to ascertainment bias. Patients should be offered counseling by a multidisciplinary team of obstetricians, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, genetic counselors or geneticists, and pediatric endocrinologists to discuss the implications of an identified SCA for future health.
13 |. RESOURCES FOR PATIENTS
The Association for X and Y Chromosome Variations (AXYS): www.genetic.org.
Living with XXY: livingwithxxy.org.
Early intervention programs: https://livingwithxxy.org/early-intervention-programs-for-xxy/.
Key points.
What is already known about this topic?
Sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) can be detected on prenatal diagnostic testing and cell free DNA screening (cfDNA).
High risk cfDNA results should be confirmed with diagnostic testing.
What does this study add?
This summary article serves as an update for prenatal providers and assimilates data from neurodevelopmental, epidemiologic, and registry studies on the most common SCA.
This information can be helpful for counseling after prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy.
Incidence estimates may be influenced by ascertainment bias and this article is not a substitute for interdisciplinary consultation and counseling.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics at Brigham and Women’s Hospital for contributions, specifically Courtney Studwell, Andrew Galinsky, and Heather Mason-Suares. Dr. Reimers was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 GM007748 to Harvard Medical School. The funder was not involved in any component of study design, data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, or publication decision.
Funding information
National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Grant/Award Number: T32 GM007748
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported..
PATIENT CONSENT
No patient consent was obtained as this review article did not include any individual patient information.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
REFERENCES
- 1.Berglund A, Stochholm K, Gravholt CH. The epidemiology of sex chromosome abnormalities. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(2):202–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Committee on Genetics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: ACOG practice bulletin, number 226. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):e48–e69. 10.1097/aog.0000000000004084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Davis S, Howell S, Wilson R, et al. Advances in the interdisciplinary care of children with Klinefelter syndrome. Adv Pediatr. 2016;63(1):15–46. 10.1016/j.yapd.2016.04.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bardsley MZ, Kowal K, Levy C, et al. 47,XYY syndrome: clinical phenotype and timing of ascertainment. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):1085–1094. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.05.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wigby K, D’Epagnier C, Howell S, et al. Expanding the phenotype of triple X syndrome: a comparison of prenatal versus postnatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet. 2016;170(11):2870–2881. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berglund A, Viuff MH, Skakkebaek A, Chang S, Stochholm K, Gravholt CH. Changes in the cohort composition of turner syndrome and severe non-diagnosis of Klinefelter, 47,XXX and 47,XYY syndrome: a nationwide cohort study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1):16. 10.1186/sl3023-018-0976-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nielsen J, Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet. 1991;87(1):81–83. 10.1007/bf01213097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Monteiro B, Arenas M, Prata MJ, Amorim A. Evolutionary dynamics of the human pseudoautosomal regions. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(4):e1009532. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kauppi L, Jasin M, Keeney S. The tricky path to recombining X and Y chromosomes in meiosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1267:18–23. 10.1111/j.l749-6632.2012.06593.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ross MT, Grafham DV, Coffey AJ, et al. The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome. Nature. 2005;434(7031):325–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lu L-Y, Xiong Y, Kuang H, Korakavi G, Yu X. Regulation of the DNA damage response on male meiotic sex chromosomes. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):2105. 10.1038/ncomms3105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grati FR, Bajaj K, Zanatta V, et al. Implications of fetoplacental mosaicism on cell-free DNA testing for sex chromosome aneuploidies. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(10):1017–1027. 10.1002/pd.5138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hassold T, Pettay D, Robinson A, Uchida I. Molecular studies of parental origin and mosaicism in 45,X conceptuses. Hum Genet. 1992;89(6):647–652. 10.1007/bf00221956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lorda-Sanchez I, Binkert F, Maechler M, Schinzel A. Molecular study of 45,X conceptuses: correlation with clinical findings. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42(4):487–490. 10.1002/ajmg.1320420414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chu CE, Donaldson MD, Kelnar CJ, et al. Possible role of imprinting in the Turner phenotype. J Med Genet. 1994;31(11):840–842. 10.1136/jmg.31.ll.840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martínez-Pasarell O, Templado C, Vicens-Calvet E, Egozcue J, Nogues C. Paternal sex chromosome aneuploidy as a possible origin of Turner syndrome in monozygotic twins: case report. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2735–2738. 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hook EB, Warburton D. The distribution of chromosomal genotypes associated with Turner’s syndrome: livebirth prevalence rates and evidence for diminished fetal mortality and severity in genotypes associated with structural X abnormalities or mosaicism. Hum Genet. 1983;64(1):24–27. 10.1007/bf00289473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Held KR, Kerber S, Kaminsky E, et al. Mosaicism in 45,X Turner syndrome: does survival in early pregnancy depend on the presence of two sex chromosomes? Hum Genet. 1992;88(3):288–294. 10.1007/bf00197261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sparks TN, Lianoglou BR, Adami RR, et al. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis in nonimmune hydrops fetalis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(18):1746–1756. 10.1056/nejmoa2023643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang Y, Chen Y, Tian F, et al. Maternal mosaicism is a significant contributor to discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing. Clin Chem. 2014;60(1):251–259. 10.1373/clinchem.2013.215145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Russell LM, Strike P, Browne CE, Jacobs PA. X chromosome loss and ageing. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;116(3):181–185. 10.1159/000098184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gravholt CH, Andersen NH, Conway GS, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati International Turner Syndrome Meeting. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177(3):G1–G70. 10.1530/eje-17-0430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Curnow KJ, Wilkins-Haug L, Ryan A, et al. Detection of triploid, molar, and vanishing twin pregnancies by a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal test. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2015;212(1):79.e1–79.e9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grömminger S, Yagmur E, Erkan S, et al. Fetal aneuploidy detection by cell-free DNA sequencing for multiple pregnancies and quality issues with vanishing twins. J Clin Med. 2014;3(3):679–692. 10.3390/jcm3030679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Futch T, Spinosa J, Bhatt S, Feo E, Rava RP, Sehnert AJ. Initial clinical laboratory experience in noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy from maternal plasma DNA samples. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(6):569–574. 10.1002/pd.4123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Samura O, Okamoto A. Causes of aberrant non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: a systematic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(1):16–20. 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Salomon LJ, Sotiriadis A, Wulff CB, Odibo A, Akolekar R. Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(4):442–451. 10.1002/uog.20353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lüthgens K, Grati FR, Sinzel M, Habig K, Kagan KO. Confirmation rate of cell free DNA screening for sex chromosomal abnormalities according to the method of confirmatory testing. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(10):1258–1263. 10.1002/pd.5814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mardy AH, Norton ME. Diagnostic testing after positive results on cell free DNA screening: CVS or Amnio? Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(10):1249–1254. 10.1002/pd.6021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ferreira JCP, Grati FR, Bajaj K, et al. Frequency of fetal karyotype abnormalities in women undergoing invasive testing in the absence of ultrasound and other high-risk indications. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(12):1146–1155. 10.1002/pd.4951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hassold T, Benham F, Leppert M. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of sex-chromosome monosomy. Am J Hum Genet 1988;42(4):534–541. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zubair Akbar A. Clinical significance of ultrasonography markers in prenatal diagnosis of turner syndrome in fetuses-90 cases reports. J Radiol Clin Imaging. 2019;01(02). 10.26502/jrci.2644-2809005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Papp C, Beke A, Mezei G, Szigeti Z, Ban Z, Papp Z. Prenatal diagnosis of Turner syndrome: report on 69 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(6):711–717; quiz 718. 10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Polivka B, Merideth KL. Sonographic prenatal diagnosis of turner syndrome. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2015;31(2):99–102. 10.1177/8756479314555222 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bernard V, Donadille B, Zenaty D, et al. Spontaneous fertility and pregnancy outcomes amongst 480 women with Turner syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(4):782–788. 10.1093/humrep/dew012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Karnis MF. Fertility, pregnancy, and medical management of Turner syndrome in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):787–791. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Increased maternal cardiovascular mortality associated with pregnancy in women with Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):282–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Alhajjaj A, Altarouti SA, Alkhabbaz F. Mosaic Turner syndrome with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism and apparent absent uterus. Cureus. 2021;13(5):e14816. 10.7759/cureus.14816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pyle LC, Nathanson KL. A practical guide for evaluating gonadal germ cell tumor predisposition in differences of sex development. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175(2):304–314. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hsu LY. Phenotype/karyotype correlations of Y chromosome aneuploidy with emphasis on structural aberrations in postnatally diagnosed cases. Am J Med Genet. 1994;53(2):108–140. 10.1002/ajmg.l320530204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gravholt CH, Fedder J, Naeraa RW, Müller J. Occurrence of gonadoblastoma in females with Turner syndrome and Y chromosome material: a population study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(9):3199–3202. 10.1210/jc.85.9.3199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bojesen A, Juul S, Birkebaek NH, Gravholt CH. Morbidity in Klinefelter syndrome: a Danish register study based on hospital discharge diagnoses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(4):1254–1260. 10.1210/jc.2005-0697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gottlieb S, Rey RA, Malozowski S. Klinefelter syndrome and cryptorchidism. JAMA. 2009;301(14):1436–1437; author reply 1437. 10.1001/jama.2009.443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lanfranco F, Kamischke A, Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E. Klinefelter’s syndrome. Lancet. 2004;364(9430):273–283. 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16678-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Berglund A, Stochholm K, Gravholt CH. Morbidity in 47,XYY syndrome: a nationwide epidemiological study of hospital diagnoses and medication use. Genet Med. 2020;22(9):1542–1551. 10.1038/s41436-020-0837-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tartaglia N, Howell S, Davis S, et al. Early neurodevelopmental and medical profile in children with sex chromosome trisomies: background for the prospective eXtraordinarY babies study to identify early risk factors and targets for intervention. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(2):428–443. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tartaglia N, Cordeiro L, Howell S, et al. The spectrum of the behavioral phenotype in boys and adolescents 47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome). Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2010;8(Suppl 1):151–159. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.van Rijn S, Aleman A, Swaab H, Kahn R. Klinefelter’s syndrome (karyotype 47,XXY) and schizophrenia-spectrum pathology. Br J Psychiatr. 2006;189(5):459–460. 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.008961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mason KA, Schoelwer MJ, Rogol AD. Androgens during infancy, childhood, and adolescence: physiology and use in clinical practice. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(3). 10.1210/endrev/bnaa003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fainberg J, Hayden RP, Schlegel PN. Fertility management of Klinefelter syndrome. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2019;14(6):369–380. 10.1080/17446651.2019.1671821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Graham JM, Bashir AS, Stark RE, Silbert A, Walzer S. Oral and written language abilities of XXY boys: implications for anticipatory guidance. Pediatrics. 1988;81(6):795–806. 10.1542/peds.81.6.795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Urbanus E, Swaab H, Tartaglia N, Cordeiro L, Rijn S. The behavioral profile of children aged 1–5 years with sex chromosome trisomy (47, XXX, 47,XXY, 47,XYY). Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(2):444–455. 10.1002/ajmg.c31788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Close S, Fennoy I, Smaldone A, Reame N. Phenotype and adverse quality of life in boys with Klinefelter syndrome. J Pediatr. 2015;167(3):650–657. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Thompson T, Howell S, Davis S, et al. Current survey of early childhood intervention services in infants and young children with sex chromosome aneuploidies. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(2):414–427. 10.1002/ajmg.c31785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bağci S, Müller A, Franz A, et al. Intestinal atresia, encephalocele, and cardiac malformations in infants with 47,XXX: expansion of the phenotypic spectrum and a review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(2):113–117. 10.1159/000284929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Aksglaede L, Davis SM, Ross JL, Juul A. Minipuberty in Klinefelter syndrome: current status and future directions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(2):320–326. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Samango-Sprouse C, Brooks MR, Lasutchinkow P, et al. The effect of early hormonal treatment (EHT) on expressive and receptive language capabilities in boys with 47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) during infancy and early childhood. Genet Med. 2021;23(6):1017–1022. 10.1038/s41436-021-01098-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stochholm K, Juul S, Gravholt CH. Socio-economic factors affect mortality in 47,XYY syndrome – a comparison with the background population and Klinefelter syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2012;158A(10):2421–2429. 10.1002/ajmg.a.35539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Joseph L, Farmer C, Chlebowski C, et al. Characterization of autism spectrum disorder and neurodevelopmental profiles in youth with XYY syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2018;10(1):30. 10.1186/s11689-018-9248-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lin HJ, Ndiforchu F, Patell S. Exstrophy of the cloaca in a 47,XXX child: review of genitourinary malformations in triple-X patients. Am J Med Genet. 1993;45(6):761–763. 10.1002/ajmg.1320450619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tartaglia NR, Howell S, Sutherland A, Wilson R, Wilson L. A review of trisomy X (47,XXX). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5(1):8. 10.1186/1750-1172-5-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Villanueva AL, Rebar RW. Triple-X syndrome and premature ovarian failure. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62(3 Suppl):70s–73s. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stochholm K, Juul S, Gravholt CH. Mortality and incidence in women with 47,XXX and variants. Am J Med Genet. 2010;152A(2):367–372. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Torres E. The need for greater awareness of sex chromosome variations. Am J Nurs. 2021;121(9):11–11. 10.1097/01.naj.0000790556.33467.7b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Riggan KA, Close S, Allyse MA. Family experiences and attitudes about receiving the diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy in a child. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184(2):404–413. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Skotko BG. Prenatally diagnosed down syndrome: mothers who continued their pregnancies evaluate their health care providers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):670–677. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hall S, Abramsky L, Marteau TM. Health professionals’ reports of information given to parents following the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome anomalies and outcomes of pregnancies: a pilot study. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23(7):535–538. 10.1002/pd.637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jeon KC, Chen L-S, Goodson P. Decision to abort after a prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome abnormality: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med. 2012;14(1):27–38. 10.1038/gim.0b013e31822e57a7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Marteau TM, Nippert I, Hall S, et al. Outcomes of pregnancies diagnosed with Klinefelter syndrome: the possible influence of health professionals. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22(7):562–566. 10.1002/pd.374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Robinson A, Bender BG, Linden MG. Decisions following the intrauterine diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy. Am J Med Genet. 1989;34(4):552–554. 10.1002/ajmg.1320340420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.McKinlay Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling (Oxford Monographs on Medical Genetics). 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
