Skip to main content
. 2024 May 18;13(10):e034518. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034518

Table 3.

Cox Regression Analysis for Composite Outcomes During the Follow‐up Period in Patients Treated With Tafamidis

Increase in both hs‐cTnT and BNP (vs decrease in hs‐cTnT, BNP, or both) HR 95% CI P value
Univariable model 5.06 1.84–13.9 <0.01
Multivariable model 1 (adjusted for age and female sex) 4.30 1.33–13.9 0.02
Multivariable model 2 (adjusted for hs‐cTnT and BNP) 5.11 1.54–16.9 <0.01
Multivariable model 3 (adjusted for LVEF and LV‐GLS) 6.16 1.80–21.0 <0.01
Multivariable model 4 (adjusted for native T1 and ECV) 19.7 1.83–211 0.01
Multivariable model 5 (adjusted for enrichment of HF treatment) 5.05 1.76–14.5 <0.01

Multivariable models were conducted using restricted cubic splines analysis to estimate the nonlinear covariate effects. BNP indicates B‐type natriuretic peptide; ECV, extracellular volume; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; hs‐cTnT, high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; and LV‐GLS, left ventricular global longitudinal strain.