Table 6.
Peri-operative outcomes in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy
| Robotic vs Conventional | Control procedure | Number | Length of stay (days) | Complications | Complication rate | Procedure time (resection alone) | Procedure time + implant | Recurrence | Recurrence rate | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | ||
| Toesca et al., [144] | Conventional | 40 | 40 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 12 | 20 | 30.0% | 50% | 108 | 60 | 138 | 216 | ||||
| Moon et al., [146] | Conventional | 40 | 41 | 9.2 | 7.1 | 6 | 11 | 15.0% | 26.83% | 279 | 207 | ||||||
| Lai et al., [143] | Conventional | 54 | 62 | 7 | 5 | 29 | 38 | 53.7% | 61.29% | 224 | 197 | 0 | 5 | 0.00% | 8.06% | ||
| Park et al., [145] | Conventional | 167 | 334 | 47 | 132 | 28.1% | 39.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.00% | 0.60% | ||||||
| Total | Average | Total | Average complication rate | Average | Average | Total | Overall rate | ||||||||||
| 301 | 477 | 6.17 | 4.83 | 94 | 208 | 31.7% | 44.41% | 108 | 60.0 | 214 | 206.7 | 0 | 7.0 | 0.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Un-paired single tale T test | P = 0.307 | P = 0.198 | P = 0.144 | P = 0.437 | P = 0.072 | P = 0.183 | |||||||||||
| Robotics only | Number | Length of stay (days) | Complications | Complication rate | Procedure time | Procedure time + implant | Recurrence | Recurrence rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot | Robot | Robot | Robot | Robot | Robot | Robot | Robot | ||
| Kuo et al., [140] | - | 3 | 10 | 94 | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Sarfati et al., [131] | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% | 150 | 0 | 0.00% | ||
| Lai et al., [134] | - | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Toesca et al., [132] | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 285 | ||||
| Rajappa et al., [136] | - | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 330 | |||
| Houvenaeghal et al., [56] | 44 | 3 | 26 | 59.1% | 154 | ||||
| Houvenaeghal et al., [139] | - | 80 | 4 | 46 | 57.5% | 305 | |||
| Park et al., [135] | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 409 | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Lai et al., [142] | - | 39 | 6.7 | 12 | 30.8% | 257 | |||
| Sarfati et al., [137] | 33 | 0 | 0.0% | 85 | |||||
| Toesca et al., [132] | - | 29 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 180 | |||
| Lai et al., [141] | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 192 | |||||
| Lai et al., [72] | - | 15 | 6.7 | 3 | 20.0% | 282 | |||
| Sarfati et al., [137] | 1 | ||||||||
| Total | Total | Total | Average Complication Rate | Average | Average | Total | Overall Rate | ||
| 274 | 41.4 | 88 | 18.1% | 241 | 220 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Overall | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Average length of stay | Total complications | Average complication rate | Average procedure time | Average procedure time + implant | Total recurrence | Recurrence rate | ||||||||
| Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control | Robot | Control |
| 575 | 477 | 4.99 | 4.83 | 182 | 208 | 21.5% | 44.41% | 214 | 60 | 214 | 206.7 | 7 | 0.0% | 1.8% | |