Table 1.
Event/Participants | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95 CI%) | OR (95 CI%) | OR (95 CI%) | OR (95 CI%) | ||
Erythritol | |||||
1SD | — | 1.51 (1.14-2.01)a | 1.52 (1.14-2.03)a | 1.52 (1.14-2.03)a | 1.43 (1.07-1.92)a |
Tertiles | — | 1.48 (1.06-2.05)a | 1.48(1.06-2.07)a | 1.48 (1.06-2.08)a | 1.34 (0.94-1.89) |
Tertile 1 (ref.) | 30/72 | — | — | — | — |
Tertile 2 | 34/72 | 1.25 (0.65-2.42) | 1.27 (0.64-2.50) | 1.27 (0.64-2.51) | 1.27 (0.64-2.51) |
Tertile 3 | 45/74 | 2.17 (1.12-4.21)a | 2.18 (1.12-4.27)a | 2.19 (1.12-4.29)a | 2.19 (1.12-4.29) |
Sorbitol | |||||
1SD | — | 2.76 (1.92-3.96)a | 2.76 (1.91-3.97)a | 2.76 (1.91-3.98)a | 2.55 (1.77-3.69)a |
Tertiles | — | 2.54 (1.77-3.64)a | 2.52 (1.75-3.63)a | 2.53 (1.76-3.64)a | 2.30 (1.58-3.35)a |
Tertile 1 (ref.) | 22/72 | — | — | — | — |
Tertile 2 | 33/73 | 1.88 (0.95-3.71) | 1.83 (0.92-3.63) | 1.83 (0.92-3.65) | 1.73 (0.85-3.50) |
Tertile 3 | 54/73 | 6.46 (3.13-13.33)a | 6.40 (3.08-13.26)a | 6.40 (3.09-13.28)a | 5.34 (2.52-11.33)a |
Xylitol | |||||
1SD | — | 0.71 (0.54-0.94)a | 0.71 (0.54-0.94)a | 0.71 (0.54-0.94)a | 0.75 (0.57-1.00)a |
Tertiles | — | 0.55 (0.39-0.78)a | 0.55 (0.39-0.73)a | 0.55 (0.39-0.77)a | 0.59 (0.40-0.84)a |
Tertile 1 | 42/72 | 3.31 (1.67-6.56)a | 3.34 (1.68-6.66)a | 3.38 (1.69-6.74)a | 2.89 (1.43-5.85)a |
Tertile 2 | 45/72 | 3.94 (1.98-7.85)a | 4.07 (2.03-8.18)a | 4.09 (2.03-8.23)a | 3.74 (1.80-7.78)a |
Tertile 3 (ref.) | 22/74 | — | — | — | — |
Multiple logistic regression models were used to identify the odds of GDM according to 1-SD increment and tertiles of maternal serum polyols during pregnancy, respectively. Serum polyols levels were Box–Cox-transformed in multiple logistic regression models. Model 1, unadjusted. Model 2, model 1 + age at OGTT, family history of diabetes, and parity. Model 3, model 2 + prepregnancy BMI. Model 4, model 3 + mean arterial pressure.
a Statistical significance: CI does not cross 1.