Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct 25;230(6):673.e1–673.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.035

Table 3.

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of GBS EOS infection incidence by treatment type with pooled logistic regression.

Unadjusted odds ratios of GBS EOS infection incidence by treatment type
Treatment group Unadjusted OR (95% CI) p-value
First-line (reference) -
Second-line 3.21 (2.13 – 4.82) <.001
No antibiotics 3.27 (2.36 – 4.54) <.001
Adjusted odds ratios of GBS EOS infection incidence by treatment type with pooled multivariable logistic regression
Treatment group Adjusted odds ratio,
aOR (95% CI)
p-value
First-line (reference) -
Second-line 4.12 (2.66 – 6.38) <.001
No antibiotics 3.80 (2.66 – 5.44) <.001
Second-line (reference) -
First-line 0.24 (0.16 – 0.38) <.001
No antibiotics 0.92 (0.64 – 1.33) .66
Covariates
Maternal age 0.96 (0.94 – 0.99) .005
Race
 White (reference) -
 Black 1.01 (0.70 – 1.46) .96
 Hispanic 0.72 (0.48 – 1.09) .12
 Other 1.62 (0.98 – 2.70) .06
Use of instrumentation 0.65 (0.30 – 1.40) .27
Prolonged rupture of membranes 1.05 (0.58 – 1.89) .88
Gestational age 1.19 (1.05 – 1.35) .007
Birth weight 0.92 (0.71 – 1.20) .54
Male gender 0.72 (0.54 – 0.97) .029
Vaginal birth 1.33 (0.98 – 1.81) .07
5-minute APGAR 0.80 (0.75 – 0.86) <.001

GBS, Group B Streptococcus; EOS, Early-Onset Sepsis. The aOR for vaginal birth in compared to the reference group of Caesarean section births.