Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD004800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004800.pub3

1. Concise comparison of included trials.

Study Methodological quality Duration/sample size Disease duration Peripheral arthritis Baseline ESR Intervention Main results Drop‐out
Clegg 1996 Mutlicenter RCT
Concealment: unclear risk
Assessment: blind
36 weeks/264 18.5+/‐11.6 29% SSZ: 24.6+/‐18.0
Placebo: 25.2+/‐22.0
SSZ (or placebo) 2.0 g/d ESR declined more with SSZ than with placebo (P < 0.0001). When comparing SSZ responders with non‐responders, the former had a greater decrease in ESR (P < 0.04)
Patients with peripheral arthritis showed improvement that favored SSZ (P < 0.02)
No significant difference in other parameters. One patient taking SSZ had severe adverse drug reaction
19.3%
Corkill 1990 RCT
Concealment: unclear risk
Assessment: blind
48 weeks/62 SSZ: 12.3+/‐8.2
Placebo: 16.1+/‐11.4
19% SSZ: 15+/‐16
Placebo: 24+/‐26
SSZ (or placebo) 2.0 g/d No significant difference between intervention groups No data
Davis 1989 RCT
Concealment: unclear
Risk assessment: blind
3 months/30 Median SSZ: 8.6
Placebo: 8.4
23% SSZ: 24+/‐7.8(95% confidence limits)
Placebo: 26.4+/‐8.6
SSZ (or placebo) 2.0 g/d Claimed effective on the basis of before‐after comparison 6.7%
Dougados 1986 RCT
Concealment: low risk
Assessment: blind
6 months/60 Median 10 0% SSZ: 13.5(median)
Placebo: 11.0
SSZ (or placebo) 2.0 g/d Success in patient assessment was more in SSZ than in placebo group. Function index and NSAIDs dosage were significantly improved in SSZ compared with placebo group. No difference was found in other parameters 21.7%
Feltelius 1986 RCT
Concealment: unclear risk
Assessment: blind
12 weeks/37 Median SSZ: 12.1
Placebo: 10.4
5% SSZ: 24.3+/‐17.4
Placebo: 28.5+/‐19.5
SSZ (or placebo) up to 3.0 g/d Only graphs (no figures) were presented. Compared with placebo group, morning stiffness and sleep disturbance were significantly improved in SSZ group
Analysis of SSZ group showed that the greatest improvement were those with ESR > 20 mm/hr or haptoglobin > 3.8 g/L
21.6%
Kirwan 1993 RCT
Concealment: low risk
Assessment: blind
3 years/89 SSZ: 19+/‐12
Placebo: 21.9+/‐11.7
28% No data SSZ (or placebo) 2.0 g/d Occurence of peripheral joint symptoms was lower in SSZ group:
SSZ: 0.298 episodes/yr
Placebo: 0.392 episodes/yr, P < 0.05
No difference was found in Schober test, chest expansion and cervical spine lateral flexion. More drop‐outs in SSZ group
30.3%
Krajnc 1990 RCT
Concealment: unclear risk
Assessment: blind
24 weeks/95
SSZ = 71
Placebo = 24
No data 66% SSZ: 41+/‐19
Placebo: 43+/‐18
SSZ (or placebo) up to 3.0 g/d On the basis of before‐after treatment comparison, duration of morning stiffness, number of painful and swollen joints, and ESR, there was significant improvement in SSZ group
Duration of morning stiffness and ESR value were given in the paper and we found no significant difference between the intervention groups
14.3%
Nissila 1988 RCT
Concealment: unclear risk
Assessment: blind
26 weeks/85 SSZ: 5.4+/‐7.3
Placebo: 3.8+/‐4.3
68% SSZ: 42+/‐20
Placebo: 46+/‐19
SSZ (or placebo) up to 3.0 g/d Significant differences between intervention groups were observed in severity of morning stiffness, chest expansion and ESR. We also found severity of pain significantly improved in SSZ, compared with placebo group 12.2%
Schmidt 2002 RCT
Concealment: unclear risk
Assessment: blind?
26 weeks/70 SSZ: 16.7+/‐7.2
Placebo: 16.3+/‐7.8
36% SSZ: 23.1+/‐3.2
Placebo 20.4+/‐2.4
SSZ (or placebo) 3.0 g/d No significant difference was found between intervention groups except IgA. There were more drop‐outs in SSZ than in placebo group (18/34 versus 7/36) 32.9%
Taylor 1991 RCT
Concealment: low risk
Assessment: blind
1 year/40 SSZ: 11+/‐1.6
Placebo: 10.7+/‐1.6
15% SSZ: 27
Placebo: 25
SSZ (or placebo) 2.0 g/d No significant difference was found between intervention groups in all parameters except pain (measured with visual analogue scale). However, the pooled result showed no statistically significant, too 17.5%
Winkler 1989 RCT
Concealment: unclear risk
Assessment: blind?
24 weeks/63 Median SSZ: 10.8
Placebo: 11.2
33% SSZ: 33.4+/‐20.4
Placebo: 26.9+/‐16.4
SSZ (or placebo) 2.0 g/d The advantage of SSZ over placebo were significant only in the duration of morning stiffness and disturbance of sleep. The same results were found in the patients with axial form (N = 34). In patients with peripheral arthritis (N = 15), articular index showed significant improvement in SSZ over placebo 22.2%

ESR ‐ erythrocyte sedimentation rate
 g/d ‐ grams per day
 Ig A ‐ immunoglobulin A
 NSAIDs ‐ non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs
 RCT ‐ randomized controlled trials
 SSZ ‐ sulfasalazine