Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2024 Feb 12;21(2):195–212. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02151-z

Figure 1: Contributions of the Metrics Reloaded framework.

Figure 1:

a) Motivation: Common problems related to metrics typically arise from (top left) inappropriate choice of the problem category (here: object detection confused with semantic segmentation), (top right) poor metric selection (here: neglecting the small size of structures) and (bottom) poor metric application (here: inappropriate aggregation scheme). Pitfalls are highlighted by lightning bolts, ∅ refers to the average Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) values. Green metric values correspond to a good metric value, whereas red values correspond to a poor value. Green check marks indicate desirable behavior of metrics, red crosses indicate undesirable behavior. b) Metrics Reloaded addresses these pitfalls. (1) To enable the selection of metrics that match the domain interest, the framework is based on the new concept of problem fingerprinting, i.e., the generation of a structured representation of the given biomedical problem that captures all properties that are relevant for metric selection. Based on the problem fingerprint, Metrics Reloaded guides the user through the process of metric selection and application while raising awareness of relevant pitfalls. (2) An instantiation of the framework for common biomedical use cases demonstrates its broad applicability. (3) A publicly available online tool facilitates application of the framework.