Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 18;12(1):coae037. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coae037

Table 4.

Phytohormone concentrations (nmol l−1) detected in pooled xylem sap samples

B. attenuata (n = 5) B. menziesii (n = 5) E. todtiana (n = 6)
Well-watered Drought Well-watered Drought Well-watered Drought
BAP <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ 0.124
+ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ 0.118
BAPR <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOQ
+ <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD 0.092
DHZOG 0.608 0.636 3.573 3.409 0.524
+ 0.610 0.738 3.091 1.004 4.914
iPR 0.048 0.066 0.057 0.092 0.107
+ 0.072 0.066 0.110 0.060 0.125
tZOG 4.12 4.82 38.37 29.78 7.15
+ 3.06 4.56 38.77 29.17 117.32
tZR 0.52 0.40 4.66 1.90 0.04
+ 1.12 2.17 3.11 0.44 0.15
ABA 131 67.0 139 90.9 487 14.3
+ 89.9 45.0 69.1 69.2 268 18.9
SA 590 583 929 941 62.3 219
+ 598 736 1061 1036 42.9 42.9

Xylem sap samples were pooled from all replicates within each treatment group to yield one sample per species per treatment. <LOD indicates concentration below limits of detection; <LOQ indicates concentration below limits of quantification; − indicates that no samples were available; BAP, N6-benzyladenine; BAPR, N6-benzyladenosine; DHZOG, dihydrozeatin-O-glucoside; iPR, N6-isopentenyladenosine; tZOG, trans-zeatin-O-glucoside; tZR, trans-zeatin riboside.