Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Perinatol. 2024 Mar 23;51(2):391–409. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2024.02.011

Fig. 1. Predictive Modeling of Preterm Birth.

Fig. 1.

A. This receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis used each biological modality and the integrated approach. The mean area under the ROC curve and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each modality were as follows: transcriptomics (area under the ROC [AUROC]; 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.83), metabolomics (AUROC: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.72), proteomics (AUROC: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.85), and integrated (AUROC: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.91). B. Circle size is proportional to −log10 (Wilcoxon) p-value for discrimination between term pregnancies and preterm births. Top features included an inflammatory module (which included interleukin 6 [IL-6]; IL-1 receptor antagonist [IL-1RA], a regulatory member of the IL-1 family whose expression is induced IL-1β under inflammatory conditions; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]; retinoic acid receptor responder protein 2 [RARRES2]; chemokine ligand 3 [CCL3]; angiopoietin-like 4 [ANGPTL4]; protein-arginine deiminase type II [PADI2]; and transferrin receptor [TfR]) and a metabolomic module (which was enriched for glutamine and glutamate metabolism [Fisher test for pathway enrichment analysis p<4.4×10−9] and valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis pathways [p<7.3×10−6]). From Jehan F, Sazawal S, Baqui AH, et al. Multiomics characterization of preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(12):e2029655.