Table 5 –

Full choice model predicting the probability of householders to leave or stay (positive values indicates an increment of the probability to leave while negative values a decrease of this probability)

Number of observations= 454
${\text{LogL}}_0=-421.312$
${\text{LogL}}_{\text{M}}=-375.258$
AdjR2 =0 .06
ID*	Parameter	Description	Value	P-value	Marginal Effect
1	Self and Family Risk	from 1 (low) to 6 (high)	−0.325	0.132	−6.9%
1	Property Risk	from 1 (low) to 6 (high)	0.516	0.005	10.9%
1	Pet/Livestock Risk	from 1 (low) to 6 (high)	0.098	0.546	2.0%
2	Gender	1=female; 0=male.	0.361	0.229	7.6%
6	Age1	1 if 18–24 years, 0 if others	−1.840	0.033	−38.9%
6	Age2	1 if 25–34 years, 0 if others	−0.509	0.588	−10.4%
6	Age3	1 if 35–44 years, 0 if others	−0.351	0.652	−7.3%
6	Age4	1 if 45–54 years, 0 if others	−0.332	0.563	−6.9%
6	Age5	1 if 55–64 years, 0 if others	−0.588	0.255	−12.3%
6	Age6	1 if 65–74 years, 0 if others	−0.183	0.723	−3.9%
9	Self-preparedness	from 0 (low) to 4 (high)	−0.250	0.023	−5.2%
9	House preparedness	from 0 (low) to 9 (high)	−0.023	0.778	−0.5%
10	Bushfire knowledge	from 0 (low) to 5 (high)	0.195	0.393	4.1%
13	Leaving efficacy	from 1 (low) to 5 (high)	0.725	0.001	14.10%
13	Staying efficacy	from 1 (low) to 5 (high)	−0.717	0.001	−16.20%
16	Having children	1=yes; 0=no.	−0.013	0.977	−0.2%
19	Having pets	1=yes; 0=no.	−0.019	0.964	−0.6%
20	Having livestock	1=yes; 0=no.	0.487	0.225	10.2%
25	Self-responsibility	from 1 (low) to 5 (high)	−0.481	0.093	−10.5%
26	Receiving warning to leave or defend	1=yes; 0=no.	0.690	0.039	14.4%

^*ID as shown in Table 4