Table 5.
Cluster | Treatment | Variables | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Control | + | Fe_FT, Cr_FT, Co_FT |
− | P_uptR, Mg_R, Ca_uptR, K_uptT, P_R, Ca_uptT, BA, Mg_uptR, P_uptT, Mg_uptT | ||
2 | Paraburkholderia ultramafica STM10279T | + | Mg_R, Na_R, Na_upT, Na_T |
− | |||
2 | EPS of P. ultramafica STM10279T | + | Ca_uptT, K_uptT, Ca_uptR, Mg_uptT, Mg_uptT, P_uptR, K_uptR, K_R,P_uptT |
− |
PCA and HCPC were performed with 29 variables: biomass [dry weight tissue of shoots (BA) and roots (BR)], mineral and metal content in shoots (i.e., Ca_T) and roots (i.e., Ca._R) (Ca, Mg, K, Na, and P), metal translocation factor (i.e., Co_FT) (Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, and Ni), mineral element uptake in shoots (i.e., Ca_uptT) and roots (i.e., Ca_uptR) (Ca, Mg, Na, K, and P), and Ca/Mg ratio in shoots (CaMg_T) and roots (CaMg_R). Analyses were carried out using R software with the “FactoMineR” package. HCPC used Euclidean distances for calculating dissimilarities between observations and average method to define clusters.
EPS, exopolysaccharide.