Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 9;108(7):1542–1550. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004851

TABLE 1.

Estimation and measurement of GFR techniques and formulae in ESLD

Estimation of GFR Variables Pros Cons
CG equation5,6 Age, weight, SCr, TBW, sex Still used for drug dosing, because of availability of pharmacokinetic data from drug dosing studies Does not take into account body surface area
Creatinine laboratory values were not standardized
Did not include ESLD patients in derivation
MDRD-4 and MDRD-67 Age, sex, ethnicity, serum creatinine, urea, and albumin MDRD-6 has relatively better correlation with mGFR especially among those with mGFR of <30 mL/min/m2
Accounts for BSA
Albumin was included
Derived from cohort of healthy individuals, ESLD not included
Lack of pharmacokinetic data for drug dosing
Race was included as a variable
Overestimates eGFR
CKD-EPI: SCr8 Age, sex, creatinine, race Standardized creatinine
Better accuracy at eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2
Race as a variable led to over estimation of eGFR in AA.
Less accuracy of <60 mL/min/m2
ESLD population not included
Overestimation
SCr secretion increases with reduction of GFR
Impacted by muscle mass and diet
Hyperbilirubinemia may interfere with SCr measurement
CKD-EPI: CysC Cystatin C Independent of muscle mass, gender, and diet Underestimates eGFR >60 mL/min
Affected by nonkidney nonliver medical conditions
Costly and not widely available
ESLD population not included
Lack of standardized testing
CKD-EPI SCr-CysC Better accuracy for eGFR of <60 mL/min compared with CKD-EPI ESLD population not included
GRAIL9 Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, age, gender, race, and albumin
Temporal testing
CKD stage
Prognostic ability to predict CKD post-LT
Superior accuracy in estimating eGFR of <30 mL/min, that is, group requiring decision for LT alone vs SLKT
Specifically modeled for those with ESLD
Inclusion of race as a variable
More studies needed to validate
CKD-EPI NMR10 Age, sex, and creatinine Removes as a variable can account for sarcopenia Needs more studies
Measurement of GFR
Inulin Urinary clearance of inulin Gold standard, completely filtered, no reabsorption or secretion Costly
Time consuming, limiting serial assessments
Invasive
Iohexol, 51Cr-EDTA, 99mTc-DTPA, 99mTc-
125I-IOT, 125I
Exogenous markers Less expensive and more available than inulin
Less technically challenging
Costly and time consuming limiting
Serial measurements
Anaphylactic risk with iohexol
Radiation exposure
Overestimation of GFR in hypervolemia/ascites in ESLD
Carboxymethylated dextran3,10 Exogenous dextran Point of care, rapid testing
Ease of testing and serial measurements
Validated in other hypervolemic state, that is, CHF
Needs validation studies in ESLD

AA, African Americans; BFA, body surface area; CG, Cockcroft Gault; CHF, congestive heart failure; CKD-EPI, chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration; CKD NMR, chronic kidney disease nuclear magnetic resonance; 51Cr-EDTA, 51Chromium-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; Cys, cystatin C; ESLD, end-stage liver disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; 125I-IOT, 125I-iothalamate; MDRD, modification of diet in renal disease; 99mTc-DTPA, 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid; SCr, serum creatinine; TBW, total body water.