TABLE 1.
Estimation of GFR | Variables | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
CG equation5,6 | Age, weight, SCr, TBW, sex | Still used for drug dosing, because of availability of pharmacokinetic data from drug dosing studies | Does not take into account body surface area Creatinine laboratory values were not standardized Did not include ESLD patients in derivation |
MDRD-4 and MDRD-67 | Age, sex, ethnicity, serum creatinine, urea, and albumin | MDRD-6 has relatively better correlation with mGFR especially among those with mGFR of <30 mL/min/m2 Accounts for BSA Albumin was included |
Derived from cohort of healthy individuals, ESLD not included Lack of pharmacokinetic data for drug dosing Race was included as a variable Overestimates eGFR |
CKD-EPI: SCr8 | Age, sex, creatinine, race | Standardized creatinine Better accuracy at eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 |
Race as a variable led to over estimation of eGFR in AA. Less accuracy of <60 mL/min/m2 ESLD population not included Overestimation SCr secretion increases with reduction of GFR Impacted by muscle mass and diet Hyperbilirubinemia may interfere with SCr measurement |
CKD-EPI: CysC | Cystatin C | Independent of muscle mass, gender, and diet | Underestimates eGFR >60 mL/min Affected by nonkidney nonliver medical conditions Costly and not widely available ESLD population not included Lack of standardized testing |
CKD-EPI SCr-CysC | Better accuracy for eGFR of <60 mL/min compared with CKD-EPI | ESLD population not included | |
GRAIL9 | Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, age, gender, race, and albumin Temporal testing CKD stage |
Prognostic ability to predict CKD post-LT Superior accuracy in estimating eGFR of <30 mL/min, that is, group requiring decision for LT alone vs SLKT Specifically modeled for those with ESLD |
Inclusion of race as a variable More studies needed to validate |
CKD-EPI NMR10 | Age, sex, and creatinine | Removes as a variable can account for sarcopenia | Needs more studies |
Measurement of GFR | |||
Inulin | Urinary clearance of inulin | Gold standard, completely filtered, no reabsorption or secretion | Costly Time consuming, limiting serial assessments Invasive |
Iohexol, 51Cr-EDTA, 99mTc-DTPA, 99mTc- 125I-IOT, 125I |
Exogenous markers | Less expensive and more available than inulin Less technically challenging |
Costly and time consuming limiting Serial measurements Anaphylactic risk with iohexol Radiation exposure Overestimation of GFR in hypervolemia/ascites in ESLD |
Carboxymethylated dextran3,10 | Exogenous dextran | Point of care, rapid testing Ease of testing and serial measurements Validated in other hypervolemic state, that is, CHF |
Needs validation studies in ESLD |
AA, African Americans; BFA, body surface area; CG, Cockcroft Gault; CHF, congestive heart failure; CKD-EPI, chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration; CKD NMR, chronic kidney disease nuclear magnetic resonance; 51Cr-EDTA, 51Chromium-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; Cys, cystatin C; ESLD, end-stage liver disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; 125I-IOT, 125I-iothalamate; MDRD, modification of diet in renal disease; 99mTc-DTPA, 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid; SCr, serum creatinine; TBW, total body water.