Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 18;16(1):2365891. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2365891

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Binding affinities calculated from competition by RGD-mimetic antibodies of ectodomain binding to fluorescent RGD peptides using fluorescence polarization. (a-d) Competition of 10 nM FITC-cyclic-ACRGDGWCG binding to 200 nM αVβ1, 50 nM αVβ3, 50 nM αVβ5 or 100 nM α5β1. (e-f) Competition of 10 nM FITC-proTGFβ3 peptide binding to 10 nM αVβ6 or 200 nM αVβ8. Competitive antibody-binding curves were globally fitted30 with the maximum FP value in the absence of antibody and the minimum FP value as global fitting parameters, and KD value for each antibody as individual fitting parameter (Methods). A reliable fit could not be obtained for the α5β1 minibinder and its EC50 value was calculated by fitting the curve with a three-parameter dose–response curve. Means and standard errors are from nonlinear least square fits.