Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 7;15:1376037. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1376037

TABLE 6.

GRADE rating of the quality of each outcome.

Group Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects∗ (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No of participants (studies) Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)
Risk with comparison Risk with intervention
Intervention: CHM Alone
Comparison: Blank Control
Recurrence Rate 333 per 1,000 111 per 1,000 (48–242) OR 0.25 (0.1–0.64) 126 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Total Clinical Efficacy Rate 825 per 1,000 952 per 1,000 (841–987) OR 4.23 (1.12–15.99) 126 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Visual Analog Scale Score - MD 0.86 lower (1.01–0.71 lower) - 126 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Pregnancy rate 127 per 1,000 365 per 1,000 (189–586) OR 3.95 (1.6–9.74) 126 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Intervention: CHM Alone
Comparison: CWM
Recurrence Rate 232 per 1,000 73 per 1,000 (32–164) OR 0.26 (0.11–0.65) 190 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Total Clinical Efficacy Rate 723 per 1,000 885 per 1,000 (778–944) OR 2.94 (1.34–6.43) 186 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Visual Analog Scale Score - MD 0.16 lower (0.49 lower to 0.17 higher) - 60 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
CA125 - MD 14.28 lower (17.09–11.47 lower) - 130 (2 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low1,2,3
Pregnancy rate 373 per 1,000 663 per 1,000 (454–823) OR 3.31 (1.4–7.83) 116 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Adverse event rate 245 per 1,000 16 per 1,000 (3–75) OR 0.05 (0.01–0.25) 186 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Recurrence Rate (6 months postoperatively) 100 per 1,000 66 per 1,000 (11–316) OR 0.64 (0.1–4.15) 60 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Recurrence Rate (12 months postoperatively) 292 per 1,000 76 per 1,000 (28–193) OR 0.2 (0.07–0.58) 130 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Adverse event rate (Perimenopausal Symptoms) 138 per 1,000 14 per 1,000 (3–74) OR 0.09 (0.02–0.5) 186 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Adverse event rate (Androgenic Response) 103 per 1,000 16 per 1,000 (1–243) OR 0.14 (0.01–2.8) 56 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Adverse event rate (Hepatic Function Impairment) 119 per 1,000 15 per 1,000 (1–113) OR 0.11 (0.01–0.94) 116 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Intervention: CHM + CWM
Comparison: CWM
Recurrence Rate 186 per 1,000 56 per 1,000 (37–84) OR 0.26 (0.17–0.4) 1,132 (13 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1
Total Clinical Efficacy Rate 803 per 1,000 933 per 1,000 (906–953) OR 3.44 (2.37–5) 1,228 (12 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1
Visual Analog Scale Score - MD 1.04 lower (1.08–0.99 lower) - 708 (8 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,3
CA125 - MD 5.1 lower (5.8–4.4 lower) - 766 (9 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,3
Pregnancy rate 139 per 1,000 326 per 1,000 (171–530) OR 2.99 (1.28–6.98) 244 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Adverse event rate 233 per 1,000 101 per 1,000 (73–143) OR 0.37 (0.26–0.55) 954 (11 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝moderate1
Recurrence Rate (3–6 months postoperatively) 163 per 1,000 57 per 1,000 (36–94) OR 0.31 (0.19–0.53) 722 (8 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝moderate1
Recurrence Rate (7–12 months postoperatively) 170 per 1,000 47 per 1,000 (16–132) OR 0.24 (0.08–0.74) 176 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Recurrence Rate (13–24 months postoperatively) 353 per 1,000 57 per 1,000 (11–234) OR 0.11 (0.02–0.56) 68 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Recurrence Rate (25–36 months postoperatively) 229 per 1,000 61 per 1,000 (23–153) OR 0.22 (0.08–0.61) 166 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
VAS Score (3-month treatment) - MD 0.7 lower (0.79–0.61 lower) - 426 (5 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝moderate1
VAS Score (6-month treatment) - MD 1.13 lower (1.18–1.08 lower) - 282 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
CA125 (CHM + Goserelin VS Goserelin) - MD 8.93 lower (11.66–6.19 lower) - 166 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
CA125 (CHM + Triptorelin VS Triptorelin) - MD 4.78 lower (5.79–3.77 lower) - 326 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
CA125 (CHM + Gestrinone VS Gestrinone) - MD 8.86 lower (10.85–6.87 lower) - 86 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
CA125 (CHM + Mifepristone VS Mifepristone) - MD 1.93 lower (3.34–0.53 lower) - 128 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
CA125 (CHM + Leuprorelin VS Leuprorelin) - MD 1.17 lower (7.05–4.71 lower) - 60 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Adverse event rate (Perimenopausal Symptoms) 174 per 1,000 70 per 1,000 (42–114) OR 0.36 (0.21–0.61) 632 (8 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝moderate1
Adverse event rate (Androgenic Response) 58 per 1,000 34 per 1,000 (12–92) OR 0.58 (0.20–1.65) 346 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝moderate1
Adverse event rate (Hepatic Function Impairment) 117 per 1,000 49 per 1,000 (22–109) OR 0.39 (0.17–0.92) 308 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝moderate1
Adverse event rate (Gastrointestinal Discomfort) 67 per 1,000 51 per 1,000 (25–102) OR 0.75 (0.36–1.58) 504 (5 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝moderate1
Adverse event rate (Physical Pain) 36 per 1,000 23 per 1,000 (6–84) OR 0.63 (0.16–2.45) 278 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2
Adverse event rate (Allergic Reactions) 57 per 1,000 22 per 1,000 (5–90) OR 0.37 (0.08–1.63) 210 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,2

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparator group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; MD: Mean difference; OR: Odds ratio. Factors of downgrade: 1 Unclear risk of detection bias, selection bias and performance bias; 2 Sample size is less than the optimal information size; 3 Significant statistical heterogeneity. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.