TABLE 1.
Chemical composition of Eugenia pyriformis Cambess leaves essential oil by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
Peak | Compounds | Relative area (%) | RI calculated | RI literature | IM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrocarbon Sesquiterpenes | |||||
1 | α-copaene | 1.16 | 1,376 | 1,374 | b,c,d |
2 | β-bourbonene | 2.35 | 1,388 | 1,387 | ,b,c,d |
3 | β-caryophyllene | 1.56 | 1,419 | 1,417 | b,c,d |
4 | Aromadendrene | 1.46 | 1,441 | 1,439 | b,c,d |
5 | α-humulene | 1.23 | 1,454 | 1,452 | b,c,d |
6 | Alloaromadendrene | 2.48 | 1,460 | 1,458 | b,c,d |
7 | Germacrene D | t | 1,485 | 1,484 | b,c,d |
8 | Bicyclogermacrene | 2.08 | 1,500 | 1,500 | b,c,d |
9 | γ-cadinene | 1.11 | 1,513 | 1,513 | b,c,d |
10 | α-cadinene | 1.31 | 1,538 | 1,537 | b,c,d |
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | |||||
11 | Spathulenol | 45.63 | 1,578 | 1,577 | b,c,d |
12 | Caryophyllene oxide | 12.72 | 1,583 | 1,582 | b,c,d |
13 | Viridiflorol | 5.24 | 1,592 | 1,592 | b,c,d |
14 | Globulol | 1.94 | 1,590 | 1,590 | b,c,d |
15 | Guaiol | 2.46 | 1,596 | 1,600 | b,c,d |
16 | Ledol | 2.93 | 1,602 | 1,602 | b,c,d |
17 | Isoaromadendrene epoxide | 1.06 | 1,617 | 1,612 | b,c,d |
18 | Isospathulenol | 1.62 | 1,625 | 1,628 | b,c,d |
19 | epi-α-cadinol | 4.48 | 1,638 | 1,638 | b,c,d |
20 | Alloaromadendrene epoxide | 1.61 | 1,641 | 1,639 | b,c,d |
21 | epi-α-muurolol | 4.37 | 1,640 | 1,640 | b,c,d |
22 | Caryophylla-3,8(13)-dien-5β-ol | t | 1,640 | 1,649 | b,c,d |
23 | α-santalol | t | 1,674 | 1,674 | b,c,d |
24 | β-santalol | 1.10 | 1715 | 1,715 | b,c,d |
Total identified | 98.84 | ||||
Hydrocarbon Sesquiterpenes | 14.74 | ||||
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 84.10 | ||||
Not identified | 1.06 |
Compounds listed in elution order through the capillary column HP5. bRI Calculated: The retention index (RI) was calculated using a homologous n-alkane series C7 to C40 in the capillary column (HP5). cThe identification of compounds was based on the comparison of mass spectra to Wiley 275 spectrum library. dliterature retention index (RI): Adams, 2017 and Silva, Pott, et al. (2010) for Isospathulenol; Lawal and Oyedelji (2009) for Caryophylla-3,8(13)-dien-5β-ol; Relative area (%): percentage of the area occupied by compounds within the chromatogram; n.i.: non-identified; t: traces; IM: identification methods. For the analysis, only compounds with a relative area (%) greater than 1.0% were considered.