Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Womens Ment Health. 2022 Nov 19;26(1):89–97. doi: 10.1007/s00737-022-01278-w

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for study variables and demographics by low, moderate, and high ACEs

Full sample
n = 133
0–2 ACEs
n = 64
3–5 ACEs
n = 38
6 + ACEs n = 31 ANOVA or Chi-square
Variables M (SD)
% (n)
M (SD)
% (n)
M (SD)
% (n)
M (SD)
% (n)
FACEs or χ2
Depressive symptoms 15.08 (9.64) 13.36 (9.72) 16.29 (10.41) 17.13 (8.04) 2.03
Total ACE score 3.25 (2.93) 0.67 (.74) 4.03 (.79) 7.61 (1.17) 685.65**
Father support scale 27.35 (8.07) 28.72 (6.65) 25.00 (9.61) 27.24 (8.45) 2.51
Age (years) 25.86 (5.6) 26.03 (4.93) 25.92 (4.93) 25.45 (6.45) .11
Residing with baby’s father (yes/no) 52.6% (70) 50% (32) 50% (19) 61.3% (19) 1.22
Economic hardship 1.52 (1.87) 1.07 (1.53) 1.74 (2.06) 2.17 (2.09) 4.01*
Race
 Black/African American 28% (37) 34.9% (22) 31.6% (12) 9.7% (3) 6.89*
 Native American 17.8% (24) 20.6% (13) 10.8% (4) 22.6% (7) 1.99
 Hispanic 13.6% (18) 9.5% (6) 23.7% (9) 9.7% (3) 4.57
 White 39.4% (52) 34.9% (22) 31.6% (12) 58.1% (18) 6.03*

ACE, adverse childhood experiences; residential father = living with biological father of the baby; economic hardship is scored 0–6, with higher scores indicating greater economic hardship;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01