Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 10;9(24):25779–25792. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c10184

Table 2. Physicochemical Characterization of ANH and Comparison with Other Testified Biomass.

analysis Areca nut husk (ANH) sal wood sawdust23 cotton stalk24 sugar cane baggage24 corn cob24
Proximate Analysis (wt %, Dry Basis) (Dry Basis)  
moisture content 6.21 ± 0.10 6.04 ± 0.20 8.9 10.0 10.2
volatile matter 76.43 ± 0.20 76.03 ± 0.10 71.0 76.0 80.0
ash content 2.37 ± 0.05 2.02 ± 0.01 3.5 4.4 5.7
fixed carbon 14.99 ± 0.30 15.99 ± 0.20 16.6 9.6 4.2
Ultimate Analysis (wt %) (Dry Basis)
C 50.12 ± 0.10 50.43 46.8 43.2 44.2
H 6.0 ± 0.10 5.99 6.4 6.2 5.9
O 42.76 ± 0.12 43.06 46.8 43.2 44.2
N 1.12 ± 0.006 0.52 0.3 0.4 0.54
S     0.2 0.8 0.08
O/C 0.64 0.63 0.75 0.75 0.74′
H/C 1.40 1.42 1.64 1.73 1.59
heating value (MJ/kg) 18.44 ± 0.16 19.18 ± 0.19 19.2 17.2 15.5
bulk density (kg/m3) 371.23 ± 10 330.12 ± 20      
chemical analysis (wt %) 78.46 78.95 81.10 75.1 77.0
hemicellulose (HC) 16.81 ± 1.12 16.23 19.2 18.7 29.0
cellulose (C) 48.48 ± 1.24 49.52 39.4 36.6 32.2
lignin (Lg) 13.17 ± 1.16 13.20 23.2 19.8 15.8
extractive content (wt %) 9.79 ± 0.18 11.23 7.6 19.4 14.8
hexane/water 8.12 ± 0.11 10.02 ± 0.12 6.2 17.2 12.3
ethanol 1.85 ± 0.02 1.21 ± 0.11 1.4 2.2 2.5