Skip to main content
. 2024 May 29;7(6):3964–3980. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c00336

Table 4. Effect of E-Beam Irradiation on the Oxygen Sensitivity of Sensors in the Different Hydrogel Formulation.

  alginate (MicroHULK)
BSA (MicroHULK)
GAC (MicroHULK)
  τ0± SD (μs) τ ± SD at 257.9 μM O2(μs) Ksv(μM–1) % Δ (Ksv) τ0± SD (μs) τ ± SD at 257.9 μM O2(μs) Ksv(μM–1) % Δ (Ksv) τ0± SD (μs) τ ± SD at 257.9 μM O2(μs) Ksv(μM–1) % Δ (Ksv)
control 246.42 ± 4.12 77.90 ± 4.41 0.0085   235.92 ± 2.04 70.19 ± 4.05 0.0093   259.75 ± 2.06 74.709 ± 5.27 0.0097  
E-beam 289.68 ± 2.50 100.62 ± 1.44 0.0069 21% 278.03 ± 1.36 90.79 ± 1.33 0.0078 18% 277.72 ± 1.76 90.90 ± 2.28 0.0078 22%
  MPC (MicroHULK) MPC (NanoPdBP) alginate (NanoPdBP)
  τ0± SD (μs) τ ± SD at 257.9 μM O2(μs) Ksv(μM–1) % Δ (Ksv) τ0± SD (μs) τ ± SD at 257.9 μM O2(μs) Ksv(μM–1) % Δ (Ksv) τ0± SD (μs) τ ± SD at 257.9 μM O2(μs) Ksv(μM–1) % Δ (Ksv)
control 265.47 ± 2.90 80.68 ± 0.45 0.0093   254.68 ± 3.03 42.52 ± 1.07 0.0189   245.32 ± 4.65 41.10 ± 0.66 0.0199  
E-beam 253.37 ± 15.04 77.36 ± 8.77 0.0091 2% 252.60 ± 4.97 42.19 ± 0.98 0.0200 6% 225.97 ± 6.70 34.72 ± 1.73 0.0227 13%