TABLE 2.
Summary of inferred host-virus interactions
| Clade and/or taxon | Inferencea | Evidence | Figure no. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clade II, Perdix | Vertical transmission/cospeciation | Phylogenetic congruenceb | 2, 3, 4 |
| Clade I, Gallus | Vertical transmission/cospeciation | Phylogenetic congruence | 2, 5 |
| L. lagopus/L. mutus | Vertical transmission/cospeciation | Phylogenetic congruence | 2, 3 |
| L. lagopus/L. mutus | Duplication | gag copies from the same individual are not sister taxa | 2, 3, 4 |
| Clade V, Bambusicola, Phasianus, and B. sewerzowi | Horizontal transmission | Phylogenetic incongruence, geographic affinityc | 2, 3 |
| Clade IV, L. leucurus, T. cupido, and D. canadensis | Horizontal transmission | Phylogenetic incongruence | 2 |
| Clade IV, D. obscurus, B. umbellus, and Centrocercus | Horizontal transmission | Phylogenetic incongruence | 2 |
| Clade IV, Tetraoninae | Horizontal transmission | Phylogenetic incongruence, geographic affinity | 3, 4 |
| Clade IV, C. urophasianus | Duplication | gag copies from the same individual are not sister taxa | 2, 3 |
a
Vertical transmission denotes germ line transmission from host parent to offspring.
b
Congruence of ASLV and host phylogenetic hypotheses.
c
ASLV phylogeny reflects similar geographic distribution of host species rather than phylogenetic relationships of host species.