Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 21;24:314. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03980-2

Table 2.

Main effects of TAVI vs. SAVR for specific complications

AUTOR, YEAR MAJOR BLEEDING AKI VASCULAR COMPLICATION PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION RESIDUAL AORTIC REGURGITATION NEW-ONSET ATRIAL FIBRILLATION MODERATE-SEVERE PARAVALVULAR LEAK ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
Wu YC, 2013 = (REOPERATION) - - +
Panchal, 2013 +
Nagaraja V, 2014 = - - + -
Khan AR, 2016 + - - -
Villablanca PA, 2016 + + - - - +
Carnero-Alcázar M, 2017 + + - - -
Wang Y, 2018 + + - +
Cheng X, 2019 + (CKD) = (CKD) - (CKD)
Ueshima D, 2019 - (men)
Ueshima D, 2019 + - - -
Al-Abdouh A, 2020 + + - + -
Hofer F, 2020 + + - +
Goel S, 2020 = - +
Kundu A, 2020 + + - +
Vipparthy SC, 2020 + - - +
Lou Y, 2020 + + - - - - +
Zhang D, 2020 + = - - +
Ueyama H, 2020 -
D’Ascenzo F, 2021 + + +
Matsuda Y, 2021
Chen CG, 2022 + + - +
Sá Pompeu M, 2022 + - -
Ion AC, 2022
Sakurai Y, 2022 = + - -
Barili F, 2022
Ahmad Y, 2023 - - + + -
Lerman, 2023 + + - - +
Yokoyama, 2023

+ (0–1 years)

+ (1–2 years)

= (2–5 years)

Tariq, 2023 = +

“+” TAVI has a significant better effect than SAVR technique, “=” there is no significant difference between TAVI and SAVR, “-“there is a significant worse effect than SAVR