Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 21;15:5293. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49602-5

Fig. 6. Schematic overview of microbial methane oxidation in the anoxic hypolimnion of Lake Zug.

Fig. 6

The left panel depicts representative water column profiles of oxygen and methane. The right panel illustrates the MOB groups, comprising gammaproteobacterial MOB (filaments, large rods, small rods, cocci) as well as anaerobic NC10 bacteria and their respective contribution to methane oxidation and assimilation at and below the oxic–anoxic interface. Note that the abundance, activity, and cell size of the different gamma-MOB groups are reflected by their respective numbers, color shading, and size in the figure. In the presence of oxygen, all four distinct Methylococcales-related gamma-MOB groups showed methane-dependent growth at comparable rates, whereas under apparent anoxia, only one group, the large rod-shaped gamma-MOB, was persistently active. Based on this, we conclude that under hypoxic conditions, all identified MOB groups contribute to methane oxidation, while large rod-shaped MOBs, as well as presumably NC10 bacteria, are responsible for the observed methane oxidation under anoxic conditions. Under anoxia, the assimilation of methane carbon into biomass exceeded the oxidation to carbon dioxide in this sampling campaign (see also Fig. S1). We envision that aerobic methane oxidation by gamma-MOB under apparent anoxia can be sustained by traces of oxygen that are periodically mixed into the anoxic waters (green arrows), in combination with anaerobic processes such as denitrification and/or fermentation that allow for energy conservation independently of oxygen. This image was created with Adobe Illustrator.