Table 2.
Experiment | Purpose | Input parameters | Output parameters |
---|---|---|---|
Native simulation | To measure the native phenotypic behavior of the cell lines without intervention |
• Node parameters: base activity, base concentration • Edge parameters: direction, type, strength |
• Node effects • Attractor scores • In silico verdict on cell fate |
Monotherapy response screen | To measure the response of a cell line to a single drug intervention |
• Native simulation input parameters • Molecular target profile of compounds |
• In silico predicted IC50 values of cell lines/drug • Cell viability |
Combination therapy screen | To measure the synergistic effect of two compounds in given dose points |
• Monotherapy response input parameters • Dose grid |
• In silico predicted synergy scores • Doses in synergistic points • Cell viability |
Combination specific biomarker screen | To measure the possible effect of node parameter alterations on synergy |
• Combination therapy screen input parameters • Altered node parameters: Under- and overexpression, Loss-and gain-of-function mutations. |
• Shift of synergy scores by node parameter perturbations • Shift of cell viability by node parameter perturbations |
By using the Simulated Cell, we are able to interrogate the in silico simulatable tumor cells to gather information about their native, untreated behavior and the dose-dependent mono- and combination therapy sensitivity while introducing additional single-node perturbation to the system.