Table 2.
Effect of WfH on individual subjective health
| Panel A | Panel B | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome: | Very good | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | Bad | WfH |
| 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 1st St. | |
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | 0.289** | 0.0993 | – 0.313* | – 0.00958 | – 0.0658 | |
| (0.132) | (0.173) | (0.161) | (0.0900) | (0.0489) | ||
| Share mob. devices | 0.00105*** | |||||
| (0.000145) | ||||||
| Establishment FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Occupation FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Occupational status FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 |
| Effective F-statistic | 52.56 | |||||
Panel A shows the estimated coefficients of the 2SLS second-stage regressions of Eq. 1. Panel B displays the estimated coefficients of the 2SLS first-stage regression of Eq. 2. Control variables are included as indicated in the respective equations. Standard errors reported in parentheses are clustered at the individual level for all regressions. The Effective F-statistic refers to Olea and Pflueger [50]. See Table 7 for the complete regression table
* , ** , ***