Table 3.
Effect of WfH on individual objective health and well-being
| Outcome: | No. of sick days | WHO-5 Well-Being Index standardized |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2SLS | 2SLS | |||
| 2nd St. | 1st St. | 2nd St. | 1st St. | |
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | – 14.61 | 0.636* | ||
| (13.62) | (0.341) | |||
| Share mob. devices | 0.00118*** | 0.00106*** | ||
| (0.000230) | (0.000146) | |||
| Establishment FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Occupation FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Occupational status FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 3530 | 3530 | 7850 | 7850 |
| Effective F-statistic | 26.371 | 26.371 | 52.905 | 52.905 |
This table shows the estimated coefficients of the 2SLS second-stage regressions of Eq. 1 and the estimated coefficients of the 2SLS first-stage regression of Eq. 2 for the outcome of number of sick days as well as the standardized WHO-5 Well-Being Index. Control variables are included as indicated in the respective equations. For the number of sick days specification, a measure of subjective health is additionally included. Standard errors reported in parentheses are clustered at the individual level for all regressions. The Effective F-statistic refers to Olea and Pflueger 50]. See Table 8 for the complete regression table
* , ** , ***