Table 7.
Effect of WfH on individual subjective health
| Panel A | Panel B | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome: | Very good | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | Bad | WfH |
| 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 2nd St. | 2SLS 1st St. | |
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | 0.289** | 0.0993 | – 0.313* | – 0.00958 | – 0.0658 | |
| (0.132) | (0.173) | (0.161) | (0.0900) | (0.0489) | ||
| Share mob. devices | 0.00105*** | |||||
| (0.000145) | ||||||
| Female (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0288* | 0.0126 | – 0.0273 | – 0.00288 | – 0.0113* | – 0.0566*** |
| (0.0170) | (0.0221) | (0.0208) | (0.0118) | (0.00635) | (0.0153) | |
| Migration background (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0117 | 0.0116 | – 0.0305 | 0.00841 | – 0.00133 | – 0.00852 |
| (0.0218) | (0.0266) | (0.0245) | (0.0156) | (0.00759) | (0.0178) | |
| Foreigner (dummy:1=yes) | – 0.0309 | 0.0449 | 0.0200 | – 0.0388 | 0.00483 | 0.00962 |
| (0.0384) | (0.0485) | (0.0441) | (0.0251) | (0.0153) | (0.0368) | |
| Partner (dummy:1=yes) | – 0.00809 | 0.0368* | – 0.0234 | – 0.00508 | – 0.000209 | 0.0390*** |
| (0.0147) | (0.0191) | (0.0181) | (0.0104) | (0.00612) | (0.0123) | |
| Age (in years) | – 0.0207*** | 0.00513 | 0.0111* | – 0.000953 | 0.00548*** | 0.00851* |
| (0.00560) | (0.00695) | (0.00625) | (0.00370) | (0.00190) | (0.00494) | |
| Age2 (in years2) | 0.000167*** | – 0.0000976 | – 0.0000694 | 0.0000442 | – 0.0000441** | – 0.000109** |
| (0.0000588) | (0.0000741) | (0.0000673) | (0.0000399) | (0.0000203) | (0.0000519) | |
| Parent (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0143 | 0.00285 | – 0.0116 | – 0.00572 | 0.000165 | 0.0311** |
| (0.0129) | (0.0167) | (0.0154) | (0.00839) | (0.00517) | (0.0126) | |
| Caregiver (dummy:1=yes) | 0.00127 | – 0.0271 | – 0.0170 | 0.0326*** | 0.0103 | – 0.00405 |
| (0.0127) | (0.0174) | (0.0170) | (0.0109) | (0.00676) | (0.0128) | |
| Tertiary education degree (dummy:1=yes) | – 0.0210 | 0.00247 | 0.00234 | 0.00899 | 0.00721 | 0.0573*** |
| (0.0162) | (0.0210) | (0.0195) | (0.0108) | (0.00599) | (0.0158) | |
| University Degree (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0549** | – 0.0223 | – 0.000581 | – 0.0318** | – 0.000133 | 0.0828*** |
| (0.0216) | (0.0272) | (0.0259) | (0.0139) | (0.00758) | (0.0203) | |
| Risk Taking (10pt Likert scale) | – 0.00349 | 0.00124 | 0.000344 | – 0.0000843 | 0.00199* | 0.00747*** |
| (0.00303) | (0.00386) | (0.00359) | (0.00208) | (0.00113) | (0.00281) | |
| Fix-term contract (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0279 | – 0.0280 | – 0.0194 | 0.0146 | 0.00492 | 0.0105 |
| (0.0310) | (0.0382) | (0.0363) | (0.0223) | (0.0102) | (0.0304) | |
| Part-time contract (dummy:1=yes) | – 0.00365 | 0.0116 | 0.00168 | – 0.00261 | – 0.00706 | – 0.0315* |
| (0.0178) | (0.0235) | (0.0225) | (0.0132) | (0.00775) | (0.0169) | |
| Shift-Work (dummy:1=yes) | – 0.00524 | 0.00322 | 0.0156 | – 0.0115 | – 0.00207 | – 0.0616*** |
| (0.0160) | (0.0212) | (0.0197) | (0.0118) | (0.00641) | (0.0110) | |
| Actual tenure (in years) | – 0.00460** | – 0.00149 | 0.00655** | – 0.00122 | 0.000762 | 0.00187 |
| (0.00212) | (0.00277) | (0.00265) | (0.00151) | (0.000795) | (0.00212) | |
| Actual tenure2 (in years2) | 0.0000743 | 0.0000748 | – 0.000167** | 0.0000400 | – 0.0000223 | – 0.0000712 |
| (0.0000542) | (0.0000738) | (0.0000706) | (0.0000416) | (0.0000221) | (0.0000560) | |
| Actual experience (in years) | – 0.00342 | 0.00696 | – 0.000171 | – 0.00119 | – 0.00218 | 0.00322 |
| (0.00343) | (0.00458) | (0.00424) | (0.00248) | (0.00134) | (0.00336) | |
| Actual experience2 (in years2) | 0.0000690 | – 0.000101 | 0.0000110 | – 0.00000538 | 0.0000263 | – 0.0000514 |
| (0.0000581) | (0.0000805) | (0.0000757) | (0.0000441) | (0.0000233) | (0.0000564) | |
| No. of subordinates (in hundreds) | – 0.000509 | 0.000536 | 0.000348 | – 0.000372 | – 0.00000339 | 0.00332 |
| (0.00104) | (0.00290) | (0.00246) | (0.000445) | (0.000315) | (0.00295) | |
| 100 <= Empl. < 200 (dummy:1=yes) | 0.00860 | 0.0999 | – 0.149* | 0.0302 | 0.0104 | 0.0121 |
| (0.0679) | (0.0738) | (0.0797) | (0.0356) | (0.0356) | (0.0535) | |
| 200 <= Empl. < 500 (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0491 | 0.0578 | – 0.179* | 0.0620 | 0.0102 | 0.0169 |
| (0.0766) | (0.0957) | (0.0989) | (0.0499) | (0.0383) | (0.0628) | |
| 500 <= Empl. < 1.000 (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0763 | 0.0857 | – 0.269** | 0.111** | – 0.00389 | – 0.00941 |
| (0.0925) | (0.120) | (0.120) | (0.0556) | (0.0430) | (0.0761) | |
| 1.000 > Empl. (dummy:1=yes) | 0.182 | – 0.0785 | – 0.233 | 0.0984 | 0.0315 | – 0.0511 |
| (0.122) | (0.157) | (0.162) | (0.0962) | (0.0576) | (0.117) | |
| Change of managment in last 2 yrs. (dummy:1=yes) | – 0.00953 | 0.0143 | 0.0293 | – 0.00951 | 0.00410 | 0.0153 |
| (0.0150) | (0.0207) | (0.0192) | (0.0107) | (0.00572) | (0.0150) | |
| Big five individual controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Establishment FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Occupation FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Occupational status FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 | 7899 |
| Effective F-statistic | 52.56 | |||||
Panel A shows the estimated coefficients of the 2SLS second stage regressions of Eq. 1. Panel B displays the estimated coefficients of the 2SLS first stage regression of Eq. 2. Control variables are included as indicated in the respective equations. Standard errors reported in parentheses are clustered at the individual level for all regressions. The Effective F-statistic refers to Olea and Pflueger [50]. Coefficients of the Big Five Individual Controls are available on request
* , ** , ***