Table 9.
Effect of WfH - Heterogeneity analysis
| Gender | Parenthood | Age | Commuting | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Childless | Parent | Age < 35 | 35 <= Age < 50 |
Age >= 50 | Commuter | No Comm. | |
| Very good health: | |||||||||
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | 0.373** | 0.153 | 0.175 | 0.601* | – 0.908 | 0.694** | 0.155 | 0.214 | 0.568 |
| (0.159) | (0.325) | (0.151) | (0.327) | (1.161) | (0.276) | (0.166) | (0.157) | (1.444) | |
| Observations | 5755 | 2144 | 6027 | 1872 | 1006 | 2763 | 4130 | 5445 | 1452 |
| Effective F-statistic | 37.85 | 5.761 | 35.08 | 8.987 | 0.875 | 13.21 | 24.51 | 32.32 | 0.477 |
| Good health: | |||||||||
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | 0.104 | 0.0607 | 0.125 | 0.555 | 0.784 | 0.204 | 0.0119 | 0.0443 | 1.774 |
| (0.201) | (0.498) | (0.213) | (0.372) | (1.232) | (0.304) | (0.247) | (0.209) | (2.377) | |
| Observations | 5755 | 2144 | 6027 | 1872 | 1006 | 2763 | 4130 | 5445 | 1452 |
| Effective F-statistic | 37.85 | 5.761 | 35.08 | 8.987 | 0.875 | 13.21 | 24.51 | 32.32 | 0.477 |
| Satisfactory health: | |||||||||
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | 0.388** | − 0.294 | 0.199 | 0.0591 | 0.419 | 0.406 | 0.243 | 0.144 | – 1.616 |
| (0.191) | (0.478) | (0.200) | (0.295) | (0.877) | (0.272) | (0.244) | (0.190) | (2.303) | |
| Observations | 5755 | 2144 | 6027 | 1872 | 1006 | 2763 | 4130 | 5445 | 1452 |
| Effective F-statistic | 37.85 | 5.761 | 35.08 | 8.987 | 0.875 | 13.21 | 24.51 | 32.32 | 0.477 |
| Poor health: | |||||||||
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | 0.0247 | 0.115 | 0.0464 | 0.0708 | – 0.142 | 0.0243 | 0.167 | 0.0421 | 0.0271 |
| (0.101) | (0.309) | (0.119) | (0.157) | (0.458) | (0.142) | (0.151) | (0.112) | (0.819) | |
| Observations | 5755 | 2144 | 6027 | 1872 | 1006 | 2763 | 4130 | 5445 | 1452 |
| Effective F-statistic | 37.85 | 5.761 | 35.08 | 8.987 | 0.875 | 13.21 | 24.51 | 32.32 | 0.477 |
| Bad health: | |||||||||
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | – 0.0637 | – 0.0353 | – 0.0548 | – 0.176* | – 0.154 | – 0.0598 | – 0.0908 | – 0.0680 | – 0.753 |
| (0.0558) | (0.152) | (0.0610) | (0.106) | (0.167) | (0.0855) | (0.0775) | (0.0586) | (0.932) | |
| Observations | 5755 | 2144 | 6027 | 1872 | 1006 | 2763 | 4130 | 5445 | 1452 |
| Effective F-statistic | 37.85 | 5.761 | 35.08 | 8.987 | 0.875 | 13.21 | 24.51 | 32.32 | 0.477 |
| WHO-5 Well-Being Index: | |||||||||
| WfH (dummy:1=yes) | 0.672* | – 0.102 | 0.524 | 0.710 | – 1.177 | 1.316** | 0.259 | 0.530 | 3.204 |
| (0.389) | (0.974) | (0.422) | (0.688) | (2.085) | (0.658) | (0.492) | (0.415) | (4.563) | |
| Observations | 5718 | 2132 | 5982 | 1868 | 1003 | 2754 | 4093 | 5412 | 1442 |
| Effective F-statistic | 37.58 | 6.451 | 35.92 | 8.451 | 0.773 | 13.22 | 25.00 | 32.61 | 0.476 |
This table shows the estimated coefficients of 2SLS second stage regressions of Eq. 1 by subgroups for all dependent variables but No. of sick days. We refrain from testing heterogeneity for this outcome given the relatively small sample size and the non-significance of the effect of interest, cf. Table 8. Control variables are included as indicated in the respective equations. Standard errors reported in parentheses are clustered at the individual level for all regressions. The Effective F-statistic refers to Olea and Pflueger [50]
* , ** , ***